(Note to Journey- Please include the original post with your replies or tag it onto the original thread. Our readers can get confused. Thanks! Lynda-RumorMail)..

A response to Journey's post from CGI member Mike. CGI is RMN's readers forum. Come join us!

*********************************************

If you do a search on failing magnetosphere you will find quite a bit of info that is not NASA. I know what NASA is and I would not take them at their word. The magnetosphere started into decline about twenty seven hundred years ago. The decline is a measurable curve. Therefore to say that the magnetosphere is in serious decline does not qualify as dis-info. It qualifies as provable observation.

The increase in dangerous UV-b and c is likewise provable observation. The trees and vegetation at my sea level altitude are just fine. Trees and vegetation at higher altitudes would be the first to be affected by hard UV. So, maybe it's the chem-trails or maybe it's the UV or maybe it's too little UV protection too late. Time will tell. A significant number of people whom I know (of my age) have noticed that the sunlight is different these days. More intense. These are intelligent people.

Also, I don't care what the “masses” do. Individuals who wake up may have some chance but the masses are doomed. That's just history.

In regard to “we are still here after many cycles of it going up and down over millenia”; let's look at that.

We have enough geological data to be reasonably certain that the Earth has undergone electromagnetic pole shifts. The hypothetical “hot iron core” of the planet, if it is such, could not sustain a magnetic field. In junior high school science you learn that an iron magnet cannot hold a magnetic field when heated. The field disappears and cannot be reinstated until the iron has cooled.

The Earth's electromagnetic field stems from the electrical charge in the body of the planet. It is an electromagnetic field. Both atmosphere and charge are being “brushed off” as the Earth travels through the near vacuum of space. There are also other leaks where localized currents flow from planet surface to space. This is charge decline which yields magnetosphere decline. It is perfectly natural and it hurts nothing as long as the planet is recharged on a regular basis. There is historical evidence for recharge. There is no geological evidence that Earth has ever gone into terminal decline.

Magnetic pole reversal is geologically different. It requires close distance interaction between the Earth and another electromagnetically active planetary body of greater electrical charge which forces a reversal in the electrical status of the Earth. There is geological evidence for this. At no time during the electromagnetic conflict would the planet be without an electromagnetic field.

We are in decline, not pole shift.

Lack of oxygen is potentially more realistic than you may be aware of. We sit at about four hundred ppm co2 at present. At one hundred fifty ppm -all- co2 dependent flora is dead. It's actually all dead before it reaches one hundred fifty ppm. The Earth is cooling so the co2 is likely to go quite a bit lower as a result. Four hundred ppm co2 is geologically the cusp of extinction if you look at cycles over hundreds of millions of years.

Chem-trails may be malevolent in large part, but there may be a benevolent aspect. The production of co2 from fossil fuels may also be a stop gap measure to keep co2 from self sustained terminal decline.

A conspiracy is contest. A conspiracy is not all black or white; it's gray.

I had asked the question “What would happen if eight billion people became aware that government and technology could not remedy a situation...?”. Let's combine chem-trails and co2 depletion. Would these eight billion be triggered because I misspelled chem-trails. Just a thought.

None of this is fear mongering. It's observation of real things that can be scary if you let it be.

Mike