(Thanks, C. :)

Reader C. writes:

=====

RESPONSE TO “ THE PEOPLE OF CORPORATE AMERICA”

The position presented is fatally defective under the following points.

1. King George, or any royal, only deals with subjects.
   
2. Subjects are property.
   
3. All corporations, trusts, charters, contracts engaged by King George are subject to the King as objects the King created.
   
4. The 1783 Treaty released King George’s interests in the governments, the lands and proprieties in HIS colonies. Proprieties is a class of property covering people.
   
5. The treaty terminated all George’s powers or authorities or prior franchises in our new country.
   
   
6. There is no authority granted in our foundational documents for our new governments to turn the people into debtors to any one or thing, including and in particular the very governments We the People created.
   
7. No man can bind another to a debt or obligation with out consent because that results in slavery the moment force of any sort is applied to execute the debt.
   
8. Dead men’s contracts can not bind a live man.
   
9. No artificial person can bind any man with out consent and the contract identifying the consent being present.
   
10. There is no legislative, judicial or executive authority or power granted to the Peoples constructed governments identifying the People as either subjects to or of governments to be ruled over as subjects or objects.
    
11. No one may be bound to some one or some entities secret agreements through force of procedure, fact, law or principle.
    
12. No one may be forced in any manner to be party to a contract no matter who says so or what document or public record claims that power of force.
    
13. Who are the only parties holding capacity, standing or authority to interpret the Peoples contracts constructing governments?

    My question to the authors of “ THE PEOPLE OF CORPORATE AMERICA” is very simple.

    Under what law theory of law or presumption are the foundational documents of my country beginning with the Declaration of 1776, not valid, in force and effect today for my use, benefit and application to all my interactions with governments or alleged government actors?

    Perhaps the below monologue might open some discussions exposing the self imposed slavery of so many Americans generated in their own minds by failing to simply read the contracts founding our country.

    Mr. Dick Weed Delbert you are setting is a judge in a public office.

    Is that true?

    Well then this matter is settled.

    Until this Court places on the record the source of your authority identifying the Courts venue, jurisdiction over the parties, jurisdiction over subject matter, and provides certified copy of the rules of court under Seal of the State, you will be operating a null tiel void private slavers business.

    I have reviewed the State Constitution legislative and judicial sections and find as a State Citizen, I am not identified as a subject of the State nor am I identified in any manner as an object of State powers granted by the People.

    Therefore, with out my consent this Court lacks jurisdiction and venue.

    I do not consent to you or this court attaching me or my property in any manner.

    Thank you for your time and have a good day!

    Does this clear up all the BS and argument over positions and who is subject to what?

    How would admiralty or the commercial or treaty or secret agreement claptrap play against the fundamentals of the law and authorities and powers of servants?

    If a judge or other public servant fails or refuses to disclose their authority or powers on record, does their claim to operate for government fail? Is that fatal defect proof of fact of a slave operation to DIVIDED LOYALTY agendas?

    Contemplate personal signing on to the open never closed, terminated or altered foundational documents, then review your legal relations to all government in the context of contract.

    Then, perhaps a clear understanding will emerge exposing that supporting the positions laid out in “ THE PEOPLE OF CORPORATE AMERICA” is the position inviting you to engage the so called rulers in their illusionary world by your acceptance of their offer to rule you.

    Arguing with a lie or an illusion is the only power it gets and it comes from you!

    Perhaps the authors of the positions presented could comment on the Response so that all of RMN readers could benefit from true open discussion in the context of facts and law of record as opposed to secret agreements and hidden operations.

    I for one, refuse to be bound to another’s contract, agreement or secret!

    ****************************************************************