Rayelan:

Use this if you see fit. Personally, I think Novaliz is a mealymouth wimp
hiding behind faked innocence. Or maybe he's hiding in the grass, waiting to
strike anyone who comes close.

It was not necessary to "back up" the use of the word "pretentious" to
describe Novaliz's posts. The content of those posts "documented" the use of
the word.

Novaliz proclaims over and over his innocence in any attack on David Icke and
Esclarmonde. He pleads with us: "Why am I the target of such attacks, when
all I have posted is a few ideas which I have had?" This solicitation of our

sympathy is disingenuous.

He claims his posts are innocent words/ideas, that he has no ulterior motive.
He, on the other hand, has become the innocent VICTIM of pernicious posts
from children of the lesser gods.

He continues to call for someone, anyone, to please debate him on his
original ideas contained in the David Icke posts. QUESTION: Is there
anyone out there in Forum Land who is willing to get bogged down in a futile
exercise of unrelenting minutia?

Novaliz seemed happy to have Rixon as back up support until the fallout got
too heavy. Now Novaliz tells us not to confuse his position with Rixon's.

"I do not wish to perpetuate a personal slanging match as it wastes everyones
(sic) time . . ." (An Apology for Ben)

"I have an email address on all my posts and you are free to contact me
personally, instead of wasting every (sic) one's time by perpetuating this
post ..." (his answer to Guest)

If Novaliz really feels this way, why does he continue to ask for absolution?

Signed: GUEST