: So, you thought you were pretty well informed by now about
: all of the main players on the "conspiracy"
: playing field?
: You've maybe been hearing for years about (or bumped into on
: your own) the various elements of society who control our
: world from behind the scenes.

: Read at your own risk :-)

I got through about half of it last night, and it is fascinating reading, BUT I have a couple things for you to think about. The only truly NEW info is the depth of Jesuit Involvement, which I had not suspected. But what makes the article so believable is that the events are still recognizable as coming from the "unseen hand". What real difference does it make who controls the Illuminati, et.al.? The end result is the same for us, if we can't stop them. But I am convinced they are an enemy, and will add them to the list.

Where I have a real problem is with Phelps insisting that there are no nuclear weapons, and we've never been to the moon. I've had just about enough of this "flat-earth society" thinking. The argument against the existence of Nukes would have to be ridiculous. We have nuclear power plants that work. Period. Radiation is certainly real. Period. If we don't have nukes, what did they do to Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the Bikini Atoll? If they have made a "hoax" weapon that is just a really, really, really high chemical explosive, then added some radioactive material to make it especially noxious and damaging to life, so that one bomb can destroy a city and leave any survivors with radiation sickness, then it seems to me that it doesn't matter much what you call such a weapon, I sure as hell don't want one of them to fall on MY town!

As to the moon landings, I can totally understand how the government, in their effort to get there first, might fake the first one, but SIX of them? If it actually wasn't possible to go there, they wouldn't have faked six landings, pure and simple. The Saturn V launch vehicles were certainly real enough, and they were real expensive. Why send them all up without a payload? And, everytime you act out the same hoax, you increase the odds of getting caught. And the technology got better as they went on, so the last two they showed the take-offs from the moon. The flames coming from the bottom of the LM were definitely reacting to an airless environment. I lived through this era, and there's just no way we didn't go to the moon. I will even grant the possibility that the first one was faked to fool the Russians into slowing down, and allowing us to "plant a flag" first.

But if Phelps can make up crap like this, what else has he got wrong? We're not going to know all the answers, know the WHOLE truth. But we don't have to know everything to know how to act in this life, on this planet. Which brings up a third thing about the piece I didn't like: Phelps somewhat racist attitude, and then trying to justify it with stuff like, "I know that's racist, but I can't help it, it's the truth!"

Bottom line is, I see some value, I think we should be EXTREMELY cautious about the Jesuits, considering them probable enemies. But we should take characters like phelps with a grain of salt, because he has clearly shown he is not the purveyor of all that is good and pure and high and true.
Chuck