: I don't know Hobie? I would like to believe it, but these
: people are "New Agers" in league with the UN/NWO,
: and want to keep the truth from you, while they
: subversively indoctrinate you. Mother Earth vs God -- get
: the picture?

Hmm, I understand the picture, yeah - but I don't know that someone's speaking of both 'Higher Nature' and 'Mother Nature' automatically equates with "Spawn of NWO", any more than someone's being interested in 'equality of women' equates with "NWO Feminazi". :)

I think the age-old pattern, of inflitrating and subverting grass-roots groups of like-minded people, would continue - by which I mean, I have little doubt there are perfectly honest, open-hearted, reverent, respectful, loving "new agers" alongside the co-opted "Let's have a new world religion" bozos - and I think we'd tell which was which by which direction they seem to be heading in. ("By their fruits...")

Mr. Melchizedek here is at least referring to "angels", rather than saying he's "a special ambassador for Gaia" (or something).

I have a number of close cyber-friends, clearly doing good works and not supportive of the NWO, who are no longer comfortable with the word "God" - they hear "the authoritarianism of the religious priesthood" in the word, now, and run away from its use.

I'd expect Mr. Melchizedek finds himself speaking to people who also similarly "knee-jerk" at things that sound like "that old time religion" they're trying to disentangle themselves from.

The real question, I think, is "What is the tone, the spirit, of what the speaker is conveying?" Are the spirits of God, or of something else?

This is a question more for the heart than for the intellect, I think - the intellect is pretty easily fooled sometimes by "righteous-sounding words" ("the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life") - but the heart knows the reality of Love and Truth when it hears it. ("My sheep know my voice.")