: i always wonder if the serious predictions are predictions or
: channeled information from the "script book".
: just a thought.

: gigi

We must, as agents, always compare new info versus what we have been told by reliable sources. Aye, there's the rub. How do we establish who are reliable sources?

One, by their track record. Two, by application of logic; what is the end result if I believe this? How does it conflict with what I know, and is that difference important? In what way?

Three, by a combination of the lower senses: taste, touch and smell. This faculty cannot be learned, only rediscovered. As gigi says, bon appetit.

For me the tipoff about this guy is that he bought the "Diana, Queen of Heaven" program. That tells me his "source" is in an underground bunker on earth rather than in the Astral Plane. But let's not toss the baby with the water. Disinfo is often packaged with info. And vice versa. Maybe some is true, some is false. The NUWOS are packaging experts.

Same thing with the Paul Bond postings. Melpomene, the tipoff for me re your Paul Bond postings was when he predicted Jesus returning to Earth in a spaceship. We already know that's a holographic projection, and we know the creature is an android. Plus, why does the son of God need an alien craft? Think about that.

Mel, as is your right here, you keep posting what you believe is relevant. I'm no longer interested in Paul Bond. I would, however, enjoy reading some of Melpomene's original thoughts. It's important to have original thoughts. Very important.

Never buy totally into anybody else's trip. Or, if you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.

Oliver