Okay, here it is: Elfrad has picked up this frequency. They can't explain it. This frequency 'just happens' to be known as the most irrational number, also known as the Golden Ratio. Do we have any mathematicians out there that might hypothesize what is going on here?
This is REAL, happening NOW. Could it be a message? Or is someone putting something in place. And is whoever is doing it from Earth...or elsewhere?

E.

http://math.math.sunysb.edu/~tony/whatsnew/column/irrational-0799/irrational4.html

The most irrational number

The most irrational number turns out to be a number already well known in geometry. It is the number

g = ( + 1)/2 = 1.618033...

which is the length of the diagonal in a regular pentagon of side length 1. This number, known as the "golden mean," has played a large role in mathematical aesthetics. It is not clear whether its supreme
irrationality has anything to do with its artistic applications.

The golden mean satisfies the equation x2 - x - 1 = 0, so its continued fraction expansion is the simplest of all:

g = 1 + 1

------

1 + 1

------

1 + 1

------

1 + etc.

Its convergents are 1, 2, 3/2, 5/3, 8/5, ... , the ratios of consecutive Fibonacci numbers.

How well are these convergents approximating g? Here are the first few E/M ratios:

convergent E/M

c1 = 1/1 1.382

c2 = 2/1 .8541

c3 = 3/2 1.055

c4 = 5/3 .9787

c5 = 8/5 1.008

c6 = 13/8 .9968

c7 = 21/13 1.001

c8 = 34/21 .9995

...

Hurwitz' Theorem guarantees the existence of infinitely many convergents with E/M < 1. In this case the odd-numbered convergents must be discarded, and the even-numbered ones are getting as bad as they
can be. (In fact this table is evidence that the factor in Hurwitz' theorem cannot be improved!)

So the golden mean can never have a rational approximation as good as 22/7 was for or even as good as 7/5 was for .

On to next irrational page.

Back to previous irrational page.

Back to first irrational page.