I, too, saw this interesting two-jet formation from my office in Roseland, NJ. It was about 2:30 p.m. on Sept. 29. I saw the two jets, just north of Roseland, flying in a southwesterly direction. The larger jet was in the lead, emitting a thicker chemtrail than the smaller craft, which laid out a thinner trail just below and behind the lead jet (as it appeard from my vantage point looking north). I found this very unusual. I'm not a pilot, and I'm not familiar with air traffic regulations, but it seems impossible that this formation would be permitted for any "normal" aircraft. I can say, however, that the trails left behind dispersed rather quickly (less than a couple of minutes), and left no lingering visual effects.

: From an observation point facing south on the west side of New
: Haven, at the Hamden and Woodbridge town lines, near West
: Rock, a chemtrail could be seen as it was dispersed in the
: time frame of 2:00 to 2:15 PM EDT, today -- September 29th.
: Estimating the distance is only that, an estimation or a
: guess, but the jets observed were probably over the Hudson
: Valley of New York State,
: or northern Westchester and Dutchess Counties. This deployment
: was different from ones observed in the previous ten to

: twelve days. The first plane, laying out the chemical
: materials, was apparently being shadowed or followed by a
: second aircraft which was on the same course and going in
: the same direction, but at about five to six miles
: following. The remnants of a prior "chem trail"
: were also visible, laying in the air in nearby.

: The day dawned cold and very clear, and the sky was as nearly
: cloudless and blue as any day in southern New England could
: be.

: Over the past few days, following previous chemtrails and a
: very heavy rain, my children have reported several days of
: sore or irritated throats, and one instance of very
: "itchy" skin on their backs or upper torso areas.
: No fevers reported and no runny noses or sinus discomfort,
: although many of my friends who are in their late forties
: have reported sinus headaches to me.

: As a regular cigar smoker, I might be a person who would be
: susceptible to high mold counts, which often accompany the
: cold and rainy weather we have experienced during this
: year. But that has not been the case. Given that cigars and
: most pipe tobacco mixtures do not carry any of the chemical
: additives or nicotine boosters that cigarettes often carry,
: I am curious to hear opinions on the following statement:
: Tobacco use, when limited to pure tobacco products or to
: those smokable or chewable forms which have few if any
: additives, has an insulating effect against whatever the
: chemtrails do to some folks. Could this be the real reason
: that the New World Order Democrats are so intent on turning
: tobacco into yet another one of the "forbidden"
: substances which the oligarchy wants banned?

: I am not a heavy smoker but I do enjoy one or two cigars a
: day.

: I do not ever chew tobacco but I have enjoyed 'snuff' a few
: times. Is there any reason to think that pure tobacco
: conflicts with the ingredients of chemical trails, or
: provides some limited form of immunities against its
: (their) effects? Would it be possible to identify nicotine,
: or some other component of the combustion of pure tobacco,
: as a counter-irritant to what all the chemical trails might
: contain?