www.networkamerica.org

(Listen anytime to Votefraud vs. Honest Elections "crash course" radio show over the internet at www.sightings.com in the archives, April 3rd, 2000 show, Jeff Rense host, Jim Condit Jr. guest)

April 6, 2000 NA (Network America) e-wire

Lies! Lies! Lies!

As we have stated repeatedly in one way or another: computerized votefraud, buttressed by phony polls, is an absolutely essential lynchpin of the hoped-for world dictatorship, now in progress. As the program for the regimentation of mankind gets farther along, the world rulers of this darkness foresee that resistance will increase, so it absolutely essential to have completely controlled elections, masquerading as honest elections.

The New Age Dictator wants to be able to say: "Dear People, I am doing this WE are doing this because YOU, THE PUBLIC have demanded it! Look at the polls. Look at the election results. I am only forging these chains for you and your children, and placing them on your wrists and ankles, because you have demanded it. I am only freeing the evil-doers to run rampant throughout the land, while imprisoning and neutralizing the good, because YOU have demanded it by way of polls and election results. What else can I do?"

One of the biggest lies told by public officials is that they can't return to paper ballots counted by the people in the precinct. They will even be so brazen as to say that "they can't return to verifiable elections because they've spent so much money buying systems which provide UNVERIFIABLE elections off limits to citizens."

The following is from our Canadian ally, Brent Belesky, investigative researcher, and director of the International Voters Coalition:

Re: City of Barrie, (Ontario, Canada) past and future, -- illegal, unfounded $500,000, soon to be a million dollar, ballot-less computerized, municipal elections.

The city of Barrie can't afford to return to printing paper ballots in this November's election's, declared deputy clerk John Sisson.

Excluding Aldermen Ainsworth, Eadie and Ramsay, who oppose the computerized elections, - the mayor, the rest of council, city clerk John Craig and deputy clerk John Sisson, are all promoting an illegal election, an election without ballots, privacy, merit or authority.

(Mayor Janice) Laking said anyone with concerns about how the election was being held, or the expense, should have made them known earlier. "We are too far down the road for them (the clerks office) to make a change," exclaimed Laking.

Well Janice Laking, why indeed, have you and your friends dared to change our sacred election process to begin with? Why indeed!

I have sure been concerned, as well as the citizens of Barrie, since the last computerized election in 1997. Not withstanding that you and the city clerk have spent over $100,000 of taxpayers money, in 6 courts, making darn sure that an application to the courts, for a [a return to a verifiable] election, would not be heard.

What are you afraid of? The courts deeming your so-called computerized, ballot-less election scheme to be illegal and invalid? Why are you so afraid?

I quote the Officer of the Assembly and the Chief Election Officer of Ontario, Warren R. Bailie, [joined by] the chief provincial and federal election officers in Canada, [as stated in] a letter to me, dated March 9th 2000. The use of paper ballots has been prescribed by the Ontario Election Act since Confederation. Moreover, Canada, in federal elections also uses a paper ballot process and this practice also dates from Confederation. The method is, therefore, a tried and tested method. As a result I am of the opinion the paper ballot mechanism is the most transparent, private and secret method of voting in any democracy. Thus stated Chief Election Officer Bailie.

On April 3, 2000, the International Voters Coalition will be continuing a petition, to restore the paper ballot and our priceless democracy, immediately, to the citizens of Barrie!

Therefore, alleged Mayor Janice Laking and friends, the jury is in, and one that can declare that your ballot-less, computerized bogus elections, are not tested by law, not true, not transparent, not private, not secret, not audit-able, not accountable, [as well as] with no merit, no authorization, nor is under any legal statute, nor principle, nor law.

Continued In Part II