I was looking at the post by Philip re the Bilderberg meeting in Nov 1999 in Washington DC.. I see that both Al Gore and John McCain were invited speakers but not on the membership list, unless I missed something. These were the only 2 invited speakers listed. Now, what would Henry Kissinger be doing inviting John McCain to speak at an important Bilderberg meeting. Am I to understand that McCain can be working with Faction 2 and having to go through the formalities of being introduced to the elite. I thought that only faction 1 or at least the designated candidates who were targeted for election and acceptable to the Elite.. ie. faction 1, would be invited to these meetings. I have noticed that GW Bush,in one of his earlier speeches, was adamand about, giving up our sovereignty to the UN. So, I am left with a bit of a confusion, Who is really on our side?? Anyone who is elected in this 20 year election cycle is likely to die in office, the only exception in the years since early 1800's was Ronald Reagan, and we all know that Nancy had an astrologer working day and night to make sure he was safe after the assassination attempt in 1981. So, summarizing, I heard anti NWO talk, from Bush, not McCain, who seems bent on reform, but has been caught in some lies already, if you look carefully. GW too, has had his problems with push polling, but these are minor issues, and both I think have affairs in the past, especially the article yesterday, which points to real problems with the McCain situation in the past. According to late postings on the chemtrail board McCain is working with faction 2, and was deprogrammed by the Navy Intelligence after his return the US. I think we should start peppering him about Chemtrails and other NWO issues, such as Frankenfoods, etc. Who is on our side, really??? Is GW being dismissed because of his anti UN leanings?? How far will the apple fall from the tree? Molly Ivans in an interview yesterday said that GW isn't terribly interested in governance, but has a tremendous gift for bringing disparate sides together and finding agreement. He has real interest in tort reform and education, but hasn't focused much on other main issues. This might mean that GW wouldn't be terribly interested in GE foods, chemtrails, contaminated vaccinations, etc. but if these issues were brought up he would have to find a solution, and actually might care enough about the potential harm to our population to take action. I see a heart beating in there that does care. I could see a scenario of both men being on the ticket, and one being assasinated or dying in office. CA