The issue here as I perceive it is that these guys mistakenly jumped on the crisis actor meme, which can be quickly refuted in this case. The person mistakenly accused of being a crisis actor can demand that the videos be removed for slandering or harassing him (or inciting others to harass him). However, the inaccurate and slanderous videos (or relevant portions thereof) could be retracted IF the complainer or the hosting service were to provide documentation to the video poster showing them why the videos were flagged. Wouldn't it be better to show them evidence they made a mistake that is hurtful to someone rather than remove content or ban them without explanation leading them to think they are being harmed and mistreated, and still unaware of their errant information/conclusions?

http://www.tmz.com/2018/02/21/florida-shooting-david-hogg-crisis-actor-conspiracy-theory-yearbook-video/

: Jordan Sather - Anti-School x Destroying the Illusion - Social
: Media Censorship - Big Brother Google (Video)

: Destroying the Illusion

: Published on Feb 22, 2018

: Isaac Green at ANTI SCHOOL was banned for questioning the
: mainstream media narrative of 'CRISIS ACTORS'

: He reached an audience of 68,000 subscribers in 3-4 months.

: He was banned from The Google platform Youtube for 2 weeks,

: and received a copyright strike for 'HARRASSMENT’.
: He was then BANNED permanently without explanation.

: He started a GoFundme for Free Speech, raised $1000, and was
: banned in 2 hours.
: He is now filing a federal lawsuit with others against Google,
: Youtube, GoFundMe, Twitter

: https://youtu.be/jN-MkK8djcY

: