Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist
http://82.221.129.208/baaasepaget6.html

I am skeptical of the Manchester bombing

There is simply not enough photo documentation. Also, the dash cam footage has to be completely fake - this is the footage where supposedly a dash cam caught the flash from the explosion. I doubt it, according to the story line the explosion was inside and too concealed for that. Now two dark and grainy photos are making their way out, that are from totally sub standard 2005 vintage cell phone cam. Yep. That. Crappy Arab video stuff, (unless it is ISIS, they at least have a camera compliments of Site Intelligence Group.) You'd think that with thousands of cell phone cams on the scene, as well as many security cameras compliments of Britain's "eyes everywhere" attitude we'd have more footage of this, but NOPE, lonely 2005 cell phone will have to do, and when you see the color balance in the two photos of the actual bomb scene that got released so far, they are BOTH FROM THE SAME CRAPPY CELL PHONE CAM. WHY??!!??

To see what I am talking about SEE THIS, this is all that was posted as of 6 AM CST. Anything of the actual bomb scene is from an old cell phone and there are only 2 pictures total as of 6AM CST. I call B.S.

OH, DON'T MISS WHAT THE BOMBING WAS FOR. IT WAS FOR KIM DOTCOM'S SETH RICH INTERVIEW ON HANNITY TODAY. KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE BALL FOLKS, THIS MANCHESTER INCIDENT LOOKS DISGUSTINGLY SUSPICIOUS.
Not ONE PHOTO from 10, 000 Iphones and the pile of security cameras in SEE EVERYTHING BRITAIN. Yeah, Yep, RIGHT. Camera in every corner Britain has nothing on this, in a TRAIN STATION. Yep.

MANCHESTER:

Anonymous sent:

Typical modus operandi Jim of a staged event in Manchester. Manchester police and emergency services were conducting terrorist drills in the days preceding this event for this same event...Always the same drills before these attacks as 911, Sandy Hook, London police stabbing etc. etc. If it smells a bit at the start it usually ends up being rotten

My response: I have not been able to look into anything related to drills yet, but RT ran a segment on crisis actors, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY: I have seen a PILE of photos from Manchester, and there simply is not sufficient photo evidence to support this story. There was one photo with a bunch of crap lying around, but no bodies, no blood, nothing indicating people were involved in the mess that got made. Maybe they censored the photos? Aside from one photo that looks like something might have happened, All I can see is an amazingly clean totally undisturbed train station from many angles, with not so much as a Snickers wrapper out of place. It does not make sense. Nothing to bite into. Maybe I missed something?

Or how about this: I don't believe this terror attack because it was just too conveniently timed with Kim and Hannity and also Trump being in Israel. Sort of like getting worn out with the same old theme and not wanting to play the same music for the Nth time? How about those upcoming British elections? Why believe this BUNK, I am sure that is what this really is. Why study it when it always ends up being B.S.? I bet a big balloon really did pop, to signal the start of a spewed crisis act.