From Reader Kyle:

Just Got an E-mail From the Globalists over at Mozilla Firefox (Immigration/Anti Trump)
The e-mail starts off with:

Mozilla is a global community of people sharing ideas and working together. We believe in opportunity for all, freedom of ideas, and that multiculturalism is crucial to building a true global community. This is why Mozilla has taken a public position against the US immigration ban.

Then it had the CEO's statement which I'll post below.

Thank you, Mozilla, for sharing your globalist doctrine, I have decided to uninstall Firefox browser and in return, I have downloaded Brave instead. For those who haven't heard of it, it's made by the former CEO of Firefox (the guy who was shunned for supporting natural marriage) and works SO much faster.

Kyle

https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2017/01/28/us-immigration-ban/

From CEO

US Immigration Ban

Chris Beard January 28, 2017

The immigration ban imposed by Friday’s executive order is overly broad and its implementation is highly disruptive to fostering a culture of innovation and economic growth.

By slamming the door on talented immigrants –including those already legally in the United States and those seeking to enter – the ban will create a barrier to innovation, economic development and global impact. Immigrants bring world class skills and expertise to build advanced technology that can improve the lives of people everywhere. The ban will have an unnecessary negative impact to the health and safety of those affected and their families, not to mention rejecting refugees fleeing persecution, terror and war.

The executive order ignores the single truth that we have come to know; talented immigrants have had outsized contributions to the growth and prosperity of the United States and countries around the world. Diversity in all of its forms is crucial to growth, innovation and a healthy, inclusive society.

We recognize the rights of sovereign nations to protect their security, but believe that this overly broad order and its implementation does not create an appropriate and necessary balance. It’s a bad precedent, ignores history, and is likely to do more lasting harm than good.