Sunday, November 13, 2016
Interesting Analysis from the WSJ

http://psychicfocus.blogspot.hr/2016/11/interesting-analysis-from-wsj.html

Q. Today I saw two articles in the Wall Street Journal that piqued my curiosity. One is a review of the new Amy Adams (one of my very favorite actresses) film called Arrival. In case you have not heard of it, it is about the arrival of space aliens. The other article was about the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assassination in 1963. It was a book review of a non-fiction work on the film by one of the Zapruder family members. While these articles were worth reading, I noticed that the Arrival film was mentioned two days running in the WSJ, while the Zapruder book review was given an unusual amount of page space, taking up the whole page by itself, except for a small ad at the bottom. What are your thoughts?

I have heard that the Powers That Were telegraph their actions before they are put into motion. When I saw these two articles, it made me wonder whether there was more here than meets the eye. Are we about to have the long anticipated full disclosure of aliens? And why release a book on a presidential assassination, let alone give it an oversized review that will catch the eye in the most prominent business journal in the country when that event took place over 50 years ago and there has been no particular mention of it lately until now? Are we being psychologically conditioned by the PTW for similar types of events or is it all just a coincidence?
A. I get that the PTW know that they have been able to suppress the truth for a while even though they were supposed to disclose things by now. They realize that when Trump is officially in office, key people that they once were able to influence may not be as easily influenced. In preparation for some possible loss of full control, things are being slowly leaked to the people so they can be slowly absorbed by the human subconscious.

JFK and his assassination was tied (in part) to his knowledge of ETs and ET technology. He wanted to share this technology to better the country, and this terrified the PTW and they (for this and other reasons) could not allow it to happen. Making some technology open to the public, creating free energy, etc, was a direct threat to those making money in those industries.

I see these two things in the WSJ are not a coincidence, but rather very related to one another. There were positioned there to say that JFK wanted to share certain things with the people, and look what happened to him. Our new leadership may be under less control of the PTW, and be more free thinking, but also take caution. If certain bits of knowledge are leaked, the people are slightly desensitized, but the PTW are going to do what they can to make that not happen.

And that is all I have for this reading (and all I am comfortable relaying). Please send some protective light to our new leadership and encourage them to continue think freely and not be punished for breaking away from the PTW and their agendas.

Thank you. Love and light-

at 7:55 PM

+++

IZAKOVIC