Didn't want to disturb your weekend readers, this is why this article wasn't posted earlier.
The link to Judge Anna's article, titled “sonofwind”.
http://annavonreitz.com/sonofwind.pdf

“He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him.”
Yes, Judge Anna's comments “seemeth just;” but let us see if they are really “just”. WITHOUT ANY ANIMOSITY OR ACCUSATION TOWARDS HER OR TOWARD ANYBODY ELSE!

Thank you for your comments Judge Anna! Never thought I'll be that important you'll bother writing to my comments openly.

Judge Anna should of read a reader's response about land jurisdiction.
The link to that post.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=57989

In the “sonofwind” article, Judge Anna describes her courtroom how many chairs and tables are there and even the sound system BUT she never stated that “EVERYBODY IS ON THE LEVEL” and I mean these exact same words!

I ask again, are everybody in Judge Anna's courtroom on the same level?

Yes, I am suspicious of ANYTHING that is “legal”, regardless who dishes it out and/or how reputable the individual is!
Think of the MSM interview reader, when Hillary was asked by a reporter; “Did you always tell the truth”?
Hillary's reply was; “I always tried to.”
She didn't answer the question but took a sly step to avoid the “yes” or “no” answer. Obviously, for a reason.

Similarly, Judge Anna failed to STATE, that “YES, IN MY COURTROOM EVERYBODY IS ON THE SAME LEVEL, ALL THE TIME AND EVERY TIME FROM START TO FINISH”!
She knows the reason why. I can only suspect and of course when questions are avoided or even ridiculed, there is a firework of red flags about the individual the questions were asked from.

What does Judge Anna wear in her courtroom?
Is she in her courtroom “a judge” or “as a judge”???
If “as a judge”, how come she is not addressed “as a Judge Anna” but addressed “Judge Anna”?
Hmmm?
“All rise, for the honorable as a judge blah, blah, blah”?
What are you “Judge Anna”....and the rest of them pretenders?
Whoops! It slipped out.
Be really careful, when you reply though!
Something is “not Kosher” here with them “judges” and what they do!

When one is acting (or doing anything) “as”, that is pretense. “As a judge” or “a judge” are NOT the same! “As a judge” releases responsibility from the entity, while “being a judge” or “a judge” BINDS the entity and the entity is RESPONSIBLE for judging another.

Judging another is forbidden, so these rats, change it to “as a judge” to maintain their hegemony over you and clear themselves before God! They would be EQUALLY GUILTY with those whom they judge, if they would be “a judge” but they are “as a judge”, which is pretense!!! Talking about checkmate for them “as a judge” and “a judge” entities! They believe, they clear themselves by using one of the most dangerous word in the language; “as”. Take a look in Judge Anna's articles how many times she uses this dangerous word. Needless to say, the status quo also loves to use this tiny word...to your demise.

Does Judge Anna wear a long black robe in her courtroom?
If she does, that is an immediate giveaway where she stands and readers should take heed! RUN! She tells there is a sound system in her courtroom but she didn't tell what she wears (as a judge or a judge) during the process.

The REAL problem EVERY country ever had and has, started and start from those long black robed entities, called priests, judges, rabbi or whatever else!
These days though, some of those black robed “devils” exchanged their long black robes for three piece suits and high heels.

As we'll see later on, Judge Anna claims she knows the problem and how to fix it. Wonder if we came to the same conclusion what the problem is. Those black robed “devils”!

“What you will find in Judge Anna's Court wherever it may be held is a plain and simple copy of the King James Bible and an American Civil Flag.”
Okkkay....I never heard of “a plain and simple copy of the King James Bible”.
What is “a plain and simple copy of the King James Bible”?
Is the Apocrypha tucked in the middle somewhere?

Even though Judge Anna claims she is not, she must be a secret Roman Catholic (calling the Pope “Most beloved”).
Doesn't Judge Anna know that many protestants called the pope the “man of sin”?
Doesn't Judge Anna know that Martin Luther used to write to the Pope, addressing him; “Most Hellish Father”?
Is Judge Anna try to eat apples from an orange tree?

The King James Bible is NOT the Roman Catholic Bible either!!!
The way she is talking about the pope, she should be carrying the Douay-Rheims translation, which IS the Roman Catholic Bible, with no second commandment.
Does Judge Anna pray to the virgin Mary too?

Do I have anything against Roman Catholics?
ABSOLUTELY NOT! They can do whatever, just don't effect me!

Every status quo courtroom also have a King James Bible in it.
Why?
Why do the status quo courtrooms have King James Bibles when they are used ONLY at the beginning of the procedures?
The Bibles are not used during the process. The status quo's victims are asked to swear on them but after that, the Bibles are ignored.
Why do they ask the victim to swear or affirm on the Bible?
Is it to scare the victim with God?
The simple reason is, they hope, their victims believe in God and fear God so the victims will tell them the truth out of fear and even self confess, which happens 95% of the time! So, the Bible is tool in the hands of the status quo.
Is it the same with Judge Anna too?

Why does Judge Anna has a King James Bible in her courtroom????
Is it for people to swear on it?
If it is, doesn't Judge Anna know, THAT VERY SAME BOOK FORBIDS SWEARING?
The communication supposed to be; “YEA, YEA; NAY, NAY”, without any kind of “swearing”!

Why does Judge Anna make people commit evil, by making/asking people to swear on the King James Bible, if she does?
Does Judge Anna open up the King James Bible during the court procedures and uses that King James Bible to judge (not supposed to) people and/or events?

Judge Anna doesn't exactly shine in Biblical knowledge, as she proved it before, so it is reasonable to assume that she also uses that King James Bible to scare the people and make people commit evil. Not exactly an “honorable” thing to do but certainly worthy of judges.

Judge Anna also states the importance of “thorough understanding of the Bible and its precepts.” As it was stated above, she didn't exactly prove even minimal understanding of the Bible as in one of her article she claimed things about Eve, which were blatant lies, in light of the records. Her latest article about “nothingoccult.pdf” is a TOTAL HOGWASH and will be commented on later. She is promoting the vomit inducing, “prosperity gospel” with one world religion tinge.

ANYTHING can be taught by using Biblical precepts if something is added, omitted or taken out of context!!!!
Communism can be taught from the King James Bible, IF the passage is taken out of context! Book of Acts.
Sex orgies are O.K. and can be taught from the King James Bible, IF the passage is taken out of context! “Come to Bethel and transgress.”
ANYTHING, your heart desires, can be taught, using the King James Bible!
Did I just omit something?
Oh, yes. That “IF” word.

What insurance do those people have, who appear in Judge Anna's courtroom that nothing will be added, subtracted and/or taken out of context?
People don't know the Bible today, so they would have to trust the judge!
Oh, boy! Talking about “blind leading the blind”!

Further more.
“American Civil Flag”!
What is an “American Civil Flag”?
Can Judge Anna describe the “American Civil Flag”?
What is the RATIO of that “American Civil Flag”?
Are the stripes horizontal or vertical?
Is there ANYTHING on TOP of the POLE that “American Civil Flag” hangs????
Is that “American Civil Flag” registered somewhere?
Does it have a “Trade Mark” or “Copy Right”?
If it is, WHO filed the “Trade Mark” or the “Copy Right” with whom, because it belongs to that entity NOT YOU???

I know for a fact that the “National Flag of Canada” IS trademarked. When I asked who filed the trademark, I was ignored!!! They were silent, like horse poop in clover.

In Canada, they DELIBERATELY play with the terms “Canadian flag” and “National Flag of Canada”. THERE IS NO SUCH THING; “Canadian flag”!
Flags also represent contracts and jurisdictions.
What contract or jurisdiction does the “American Civil Flag” represent?
There are at least a dozen “American flags”; using slang. Just like there is no such thing; “Canadian flag”, I am pretty sure there is no such thing; “American flag”.
Is this applicable to “American Civil Flag” too?

Long time ago, I did read somewhere that horizontal stripes on a flag mean military, while vertical stripes mean peace and “civil”. Anybody who had vertical striped flag displayed was safe from the military while the opposite if they had horizontal stripes on their flags. I don't know if it is true or not.

This should be repeated again and watch out readers! The two most dangerous words in the language are “as” and “like”. You draw your own conclusion.

Judges (ALL OF THEM) are tricky critters!! Many lie by OMISSIONS! PLURAL!
Listen to this one from Judge Anna!
“...it is only as a man --- not as a corporation--- that we have life and can claim the traditions, treaties, property, right and all else that we are heir to.”
So, if you are “only as a man”, then things can be claimed!
What happens if you are “a man”, not “as a man”?
“as a man” and “a man” are NOT the same! Whatever follows after “...as a man”, is immaterial in relation to “a man”.

To illustrate the difference, one might be “pretty as a rose” but that doesn't make the one who is pretty a rose. If you are “as a man”, you are NOT “a man”. You “...can claim the traditions, treaties, property, right and all else...” but ONLY “as a man” and NOT “a man”. If you are “a man”, you can't claim anything that are listed by Judge Anna.
Interestingly, the kind of process Judge Anna displays is one of the many tactics of the Jesuits.

Do you realize reader that even one coma could mean life and death?
Judge Anna keeps using one of those deadly words “as”, all over her articles but no real surprise, BECAUSE THE STATUS QUO LEGAL SYSTEM DOES EXACTLY THE SAME! This is NOT “accusation”, the facts are there for everybody to see.

Doesn't Judge Anna know the King James Bible states something about “tradition” and it is not exactly good???
What about the word “rights”?
What does the King James Bible state about that word?
How about “heir”?
Anything written about that in the King James Bible, Judge Anna?

What does it exactly mean “Thorough understanding of the Bible”, Judge Anna?
Since you are a judge, you must claim “Thorough understanding of the Bible”, because you claim it is a necessity but how come you are so out to lunch in Biblical DOCTRINES?
Most likely, your claim is; “oh, that is just your interpretation” crap?
What do I have to interpret; “if you don't repent you all likewise perish”?
YOU have to “interpret” to mean something else than what actually stated! So, problem solved in your eyes. You don't have to “repent” and you won't be perished either...according to YOUR interpretation. I didn't “interpret” anything. YOU DID, if you cling to your feeble minded “oh, that is just your interpretation” hogwash.

Do you put Biblical interpretations in the same group with the stupid dummies, called “legislators” of the status quo with their man-made acts, policies,customs, etc.?
Don't you know, NOBODY has any business “interpreting” the Bible?
Interestingly, the Roman Catholic Church interprets their scriptures at their will.

“The Law of the Sea was never designed to serve the needs of people, but rather designed to make people serve the needs of kings.”
I got to laugh on this!!!! My, my, my! What ignorance Judge Anna!
Does Judge Anna know the reason for the existence of kings?
Who wanted kings?
Does Judge Anna think the kings who had/have land jurisdiction don't want people to serve them?

“When such a COURT sends out a 'summons' it is making an 'offer' which you can refuse by returning a 'counter offer'. You never have to step foot in their courtroom or enter their jurisdiction at all.”
Wonder when was the last time Judge Anna was hauled into a status quo courtroom, being their victim?
First of all, “they” capture you, then kidnap you and “they” rape you, while railroading you into one of their warehouses or “Arbeit Macht Frei” camps. Once you are in their grip, you are AUTOMATICALLY a “DEFENDANT” and you got TWO pleas. “Guilty” or “Not guilty”. PERIOD!
By the way, “Rape” is the forcing of one's will over another. It has nothing to do with sex!

“I am not the DEFENDANT being....”
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE A NEGATIVE CONDITION. It is impossible to prove that you are NOT the “DEFENDANT”! You can never prove a negative action or contract, because THERE IS NO SUCH THING! It doesn't exist!

“And then Son of Wind is wondering who is in charge of his town, where he lives-----? He wants me to tell him?”
Come now, Judge Anna!
Don't you recognize symbolism?
Don't you know every symbolism is just that and used for illustration?
I seriously doubt Judge Anna could tell me who is in charge of the town and I don't mean “his town” as she perverted it, which is again, typical.

“Son of Wind is another disillusioned armchair quarterback ranting about the 'status quo' without the faintest idea of how we got into this mess and therefore, doesn't have the foggiest idea how to get out, but he wants to sit around and gripe and complain and express his suspicions about anyone and everything----- including me. And somehow, the rest of the people stand around and listen to him and then expect me to 'answer' him when in reality, there is nothing of substance to answer.”
Yes. The typical judge in motions.
Why doesn't Judge Anna answer to questions?
Why does Judge Anna get upset and defensive when REAL questions asked from her?
This kind of behaviour is typical and another favourite of the Jesuits. Attacking the “messenger”, diverting the attention of the people from the issues that were raised by the “messenger”.

At best, Judge Anna is shadow boxing, trying to fix things with a carnal mind, unable to accept the existence of the spiritual realm, let alone the entities who reside there...and much closer to her. If God would “open her eyes” to see what is around her, she would faint from fear!

“And since I know what is wrong, and know how it came to be wrong, I am in a position to take action to fix it and teach others how to fix it, while all 'Son of Wind' can do is blow more hot air in every direction.”
A very bold statement by Judge Anna!
No more than five sentences, would Judge Anna tell everybody what is wrong and how it came to be wrong?
Get ready readers to see a bat flying backward...by reading her explanation, if she does explain.

“The first step toward correcting any problem is to clearly define what the problem is.”
Couldn't agree more!
What is the problem Judge Anna?
The problem is much deeper than what you describe. Actually, what you describe to be the problem is the SYMPTOM! In other words, what you claim the problem is that is the “FRUIT”.
You could only “eat” a fruit or leave it where it is.
How could you “fix” any fruit, yet you claim you could and even teach others how to fix it?

What is the REAL and ONLY problem of mankind???
Help you out on this one!
Because we were ALL born to the image of Adam, NOT to the image of God. More precisely, we were born with the FALLEN NATURE of Adam. This means the “umbilical cord” between God and man was cut! God is NOT your friend or “Father” but your enemy, UNTIL......
Something to do with “Wind”, Judge Anna, you love to make so much fun of! Lol. You are “cutting yourself to pieces” and don't even know it! That “Two edged sword” cuts BOTH ways! It can cut you loose or cut you up!
Don't you know you are “bleeding” all over?

“...but at a certain point they have to realize that what I say is true.”
Here we go! A self proclaimed statement. What I say is true. There is nothing more to be said about this but “let not thine own mouth praise thee but a stranger”. I'm sure Judge Anna knew this, since she has a “thorough understanding of the Bible”.

“...I am not here to convince anyone of anything. I am not here to babysit, or answer Son of Wind's frequent rants.”
Obviously, Judge Anna refuses to answer questions or only my questions?
Again, she perverted and twisted the facts of QUESTIONS, and changed them to "rants". Again, the typical Jesuit tactic.
Doesn't Judge Anna know this itsy bitsy statement of “prove all things, hold fast that which is good”?
What does it mean “prove all things”?
No questions but accept and do what “you” are told, shut up and get back to the plantation?

It is Judge Anna's continuous trend to make fun of her nickname “Son of Wind” and she thrusts that German dagger of “Blut und Ehre!” at every opportunity she gets. Lol. She ignorantly or deceitfully don't even use “Sonofthewind” but twists it, pervert it, to suit her goal to ridicule me. She acts like little children, making fun of the perverted names of their classmates. Funny to see it from a "granny".

Judge Anna implies that “wind” is “fart”, she just didn't come out and state it this plainly. She uses “hot air”.
“Wind” and “air” are not the same, Judge Anna, don't you know?
I wonder if Judge Anna also implies that “wind” is “fart” in this passage; “The wind bloweth where it is listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.”
Does Judge Anna call the “wind” in this above passage “fart” or “hot air” too?
By the way, are you “born of the Spirit” Judge Anna?
OR
Are you still full of “hot air” or with your own “fart”?
Only questions!

You see, if you don't have the “Spirit of truth”, it is impossible for you to tell the truth.
How do you, Judge Anna call the “Spirit of truth”?
Do you call It the “Wind of truth” or the “hot air of truth” or perhaps the “Fart of truth”?
Which one is it Judge Anna?
Being a judge, you supposed to have a “thorough understanding of the Bible”, so you must know.

Since Judge Anna started her article, with the importance of the King James Bible, I have another question for her.
Why don't you and the status quo leaders of mankind state and broadcast the title and name; “Lord Jesus Christ” openly?
I never heard it from you and from your kind, yet!
IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE TO ME IF YOU OR YOUR KIND DO IT OR NOT!!!
Only curious.

Why do you and the status quo ALWAYS state “God” and NEVER “Lord Jesus Christ”?
Every day, when you and everybody else get up in the morning, the date you are bound to, start from the birth of this chap. A silent reminder to the “Lord Jesus Christ” with your ACKNOWLEDGEMENT and millions and millions of times A DAY! Even the “Atheists” have to abide by it!
Isn't it so?

Why do people cuss, using the name “Jesus Christ”?
Why don't they cuss, using the name of “Buddha” or “Confucius” or “Venus” or “Saturn” or “Jupiter” or “Mary” or the “Pope”?
Do you know the answer Judge Anna?

You Judge Anna, claim to be the teacher of others and as you stated yourself, must have “thorough understanding of the Bible”, which is not only essential but absolute necessity.

If you know any history, your kind Judge Anna, was/is trying to bring in the “kingdom” and “peace on Earth, good will to man”, for thousands of years and there is no kingdom or peace but the opposite! War, famine, death and oceans of tears. Not only that but BLAMING GOD for it! Pretty soon you will be celebrating somebody's birth, who is associated with kingdom and peace! As a matter of fact, called the “Prince of Peace”. The only problem is, that this “somebody” NEVER acknowledged by the status quo who and what He is. THE KING OF THE KINGDOM.
Why is this hatred, towards this chap, yet celebrating His presumed birth day?
Don't you know, without this King, there never be “peace on Earth”?

You CLAIM, you know what the problem is!
By the way, did you catch that I deliberately omitted (actually quoted your kind) in the above quote of “peace on Earth, good will to man”?
Let me help you out, because you (aside from a very few readers) don't even know what is missing. What is missing, “Glory to God in the highest...”, then and only then “peace on Earth, goodwill to man”. Until you give God the glory, you are stuck in the mud, spinning your wheels, burning up your clutch. Like you can hear it in Beethoven's music, as I told you before.

The list below, are historical records of a few of those whom the papa “blessed”.
Wonder if anybody, after reading this short list, wants to stand in line for a papal blessing. There are a lot more people, objects and events that suffered the same fate of misfortune or death, shortly after Papal blessings.
1 - Franz Joseph of Austria, was defeated at Sadowa and lost his possessions in North Italy, eight months after the Pope blessed him
2 – In 1914, a rich English landowner named Dyer Edwards turned Papist. Went to Rome in 1916 to get a personal blessing, and four days later he was dead.
3 – In July 1963, JFK was blessed in a private audience with the Pope, he was killed in November.
4 – In April 1966, the Pope blessed Queen Ann-Marie and King Constantine II of Greece. One year later, they were exiled to Rome after a military coup.
5 – In October 1965, in New York City, President Johnson met the Pope privately and attended Mass. In April 1968, he turned down the nomination of his party to run for a second term after being plagued with race riots...

Does Judge Anna know that one of the Popes was a female who gave child birth in the Vatican?
This is the crowd Judge Anna hangs around with. Calling the Pope “Most beloved”. Putting the Pope above God himself.

Finally!
Believe me, I don't want to “shoot” you Judge Anna or anybody else. In fact if I may say, I love you (as a sister) and wish nothing but the best for you, for your family and even for those whom you are trying to help. Perhaps, there is a need for “...as of a rushing mighty wind”, if you know what I mean in your life.
If you think I am your enemy, you are gravely mistaken but I can't do anything about it.

Perhaps this link will give you further assistance Judge Anna. Another perspective. Oh, those questions, questions, questions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeXCPY5iryY

I sincerely trust that NOBODY is following me! Also trust that NOBODY follows what I state, before carefully examining and proving! I NEVER claimed I know everything either. There are plenty of things I don't know.

Remember readers, these are all rumours what you read here.