source:
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2064.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

June 28, 2016
US Supreme Court Shockingly Gives Hillary Clinton “Get Out Of Jail Free” Card
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An interesting Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) circulating in the Kremlin today says that following the mysterious death last week of former UN President John Ashe, who was scheduled to testify against Hillary Clinton before a US Federal grand jury, the US Supreme Court yesterday “shockingly/stunningly” gave to her a “Get Out Of Jail Free” card—which is a reference to cards used in a popular American board game called Monopoly. [Note: Some words and phrases appearing in this report are English language approximations of Russian words and phrases having no exact counterpart.]

According to this report, the “Get Out Of Jail Free” gift card received by Hillary Clinton was delivered to her by the US Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in McDONNELL v. UNITED STATES [No. 15–474. Argued April 27, 2016—Decided June 27, 2016] that overturned former Virginia governor Robert F. McDonnell’s public-corruption conviction and imposed higher standards for federal prosecutors who charge public officials with wrongdoing.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. writing the ruling for this unprecedented decision said that the instructions to the jury in his case about what constitutes “official acts” were so broad they could cover almost any action a public official takes, and further stated: “There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns, it is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.”

SVR legal analysts in this report explain that what the US Supreme Court actually stated (in plain words) was that in order for anything to be considered bribery in the United States now, it must be evidenced by a Quid Pro Quo (“something for something” or “this for that” in Latin) that proves the offender personally received a benefit from another party seeking their favor.

To how this US Supreme Court ruling frees Hillary Clinton from a bribery prosecution, this report continues, involves her actions while Secretary of State where from 2009-2013 when she singlehandedly felicitated and approved the sale of vast American-Canadian uranium deposits to Russia while at the same time her husband, former President Bill Clinton, received millions of dollars in donations to his and Hillary’s Clinton Foundation multi billion dollar slush fund.

This report further states that these “bribes/contributions” were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Secretary Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors—but with this US Supreme Court ruling doesn’t matter anymore because no one can actually prove that these bribes were given to her.

To how angry the American people are about this US Supreme Court ruling freeing Hillary Clinton from ever being prosecuted for her crimes, this report notes, cannot be known as virtually no US mainstream news organization has reported on it, or its astounding ramifications, with their choosing to trumpet a relatively minor abortion ruling instead.

As to how shockingly corrupt the US Federal Court system has become in allowing such unprecedented rulings like this to benefit the elite classes, SVR analysts in this report say, has been evidenced many times over the past few decades—and as best exampled by US Federal Jude Richard A. Posner of the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit (Chicago), who not only is the most cited American legal scholar of the 20th century, recently wrote these chilling words: “I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation (across the centuries—well, just a little more than two centuries, and of course less for many of the amendments).”

To the horrifying implications for Western peoples whose legal system, like the United States, is based on a common law system binding judges to adhere to past precedents, this report warns, the abandoning of the US Constitution is allowing a new legal framework to develop in both the US and Britain that in future will ensure the total enslavement of the once free peoples of these nations.

As to actual evidence of this now occurring, one SVR analyst in this report cites two critical cases that are being followed: 1.) In Britain where for the first time in that nations history a man was found guilty of crime after he died, and 2.) In the US where for the first time in that nations history a man was charged with murder after his ex-girlfriend committed suicide.

The justification for these unprecedented new legal maneuvers against the Western peoples of the US and UK, this report explains, is that once it is established that the state can prosecute people who have died, and charge people with murder for the suicides of those they may have had contact with, none of these peoples will ever be free from being prosecuted for anything.

This report cites a few examples of this by noting that the US and UK governments, if successful in their test cases, would then establish the precedents of accusing anti-global warming writers (for instance) of murder if one of their readers committed suicide, and/or, can threaten to destroy the families of anyone accused of being a dissident by convicting their loved ones of crimes after they are dead and them having no way to defend themselves.

The conclusion of this report notes that these test cases, as always, involve despicable people so that no sympathy will be imparted to them, but warns that it is by deliberate design—and is, essentially, why Hillary Clinton is now free to commit more crimes, because those who should have known didn’t pay attention, and those that did couldn’t care less.

June 28, 2016 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com.