Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
Its Not About Equality, Its About Personal Desire, Societal Corruption, & Perceptual Clarity
I question why people assume that there needs to be an equality among the sexes, skin colors, religions, in every area of life.
The assumption that women must achieve the same things that men achieve, as if its worthy of women's attention.
Why must women have the same numbers as men in particular fields of industry? Women can give birth to children. Men cannot. Isn't the fact that women play an extremely important role in the survival of the specie, worthy of respect as is? Must women compete with men in creating products? Why? What is the need to do such a thing? Financial freedom? Isn't that a consequence of society failing in other areas? Should we be concerned with competition, in order to treat a symptom, that is born from a societal failure? Wouldn't it be better to focus on the cause of those problems, instead of treating the symptoms? Look further up-stream?
No matter the sex, skin color, or religion, knowledge and skill are always welcome. People like to learn, especially if the knowledge or skill helps make life easier or more pleasurable.
It is stupid to forcefully require people of different sex or skin color, to hold a particular job, in a particular industry, for the sake of "equality" among the sexes or skin colors, totally disregarding the individual knowledge and skill level required to perform the job. Just because a human is female, and forcefully employed, does not mean that female can perform the job. You can make a law that forces society to respect a man who wants to give birth to a child, but that does not mean a man can give birth to a child. You can make a law that requires a river to not reach a certain height, but nature is going to show you that it doesn't care about man made laws.
It is assumed that prejudice is the reason for there not being an equal number of male/female, black/white/brown/yellow/etc. in any area of society. In reality, its more likely that only certain people put out the effort to study, practice, and had the patience to stick with it through the confusion of the learning process, in order to obtain a specific goal or job.
Of course, there is the use of non-existent inequality, to further an agenda of some control-freak or financial-junkie, by making a mountain out of a mole-hill. Just making shit up on the public media for leverage purposes. It is an amplification of a small signal, to make it seem like it is an across the board problem, when it is not.
For example, someone being elected as president/ceo of the united states corporation because that someone is black, or a woman. As if we need to give an unqualified individual a shot at the job, because we just haven't had a black or woman in that position yet. Never mind about qualifications, knowledge, or skill level. Just put that person in there and we'll see what happens. That is just retarded. But recall that government is for show purposes anyway, and it all makes sense. Government is a taker not a maker, so it is important to keep the population on the hook, to keep sucking blood from the population. That requires people believe in some nebulous benefit from government. Like a black president is gonna look out for fellow black people. Or a female president is gonna look out for females. The simpleton mentality. The team mentality. Remember "divide and conquer"?
When I think about woman having problems in society or relationships, I am reminded of the many times I have witnessed the behavior of fathers towards their daughters. When a father does certain things for his daughter, because she is a fragile female, he stunts her growth. She grows to expect a man to do certain things for her, instead of doing those things herself. I know those actions are due to his love for her, and desire to protect her. I am not saying to treat her as a boy. But the dependency makes for future relationships that are just as dependent. This explains why so many people are in relationships that are not balanced. Where a woman continues to be dependent upon a man, and grows to hate that man because of it.
It is an historical fact. Metaphysical art often depicts women mentally manipulating men. Advertisments play on this. Propaganda plays on this. This is because men have been raised to be the physically strong mate. Men have used their strength to dominate women physically. So woman have enhanced other abilities in response to the fear of violence. The use of beauty to stun the male, and sex or lack of it, to motivate. The head games. The tears. The emotion.
Wouldn't it have been easier to learn the skills that make survival easier? Wouldn't relationships be made while walking similar paths, instead of constantly trying to dominate each other? Can you have a real relationship with someone that you are simultaneously competing with? True mates complement each other. As in, counterparts. Designed to function together.
Here are some links to youtube videos, that some idiot has decided not to allow embedding of those youtube videos. You can watch it on youtube's page, but you cannot watch it on another webpage? Retarded..
