Documentary Could Solve Australia's 1996 False Flag (Port Arthur) Massacre
By Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB

Tomorrow, March 7, 2016, Chanel 7 in Sydney will wow us with a documentary about Port Arthur that has been 20 years in the making. With hard-hitting investigative journalism, I think they will be able to answer many crucial questions. We offer thanks in advance to the media for whatever they can do.

Let’s have a pen and paper ready to jot down the answers that the TV show will give us. The first person who hears a satisfying answer to my first three questions below, and notices any other 5 good answers, wins BINGO. You must, of course, send a comment to GumshoeNews.com when you think you’ve scored.

1. Why did the DPP not allow Wendy Scurr, who was at Port Arthur all day on April 28, 1996, to provide a statement?

2. How did the fire start at Seascape cottage on the morning of April 29th?

3. Who lit it?

4. Did Martin Bryant’s guardian (reportedly Perpetual Trustees) advise the police that they were his guardian?
In what room of Glenside Hospital, SA, was Martin imprisoned in 1988?

5. Wikipedia says that Martin tried to swallow a razor blade to kill himself. Did he really do that? How far did the razor blade get?

6. Risdon said that Martin refused visits from his mother. Is that true? Why would a lonely person refuse company?
7. How about the 21 guns that were found in a white piano at Martin’s house? How was that piano ultimately disposed of?

8. Which member of the Tasmanian parliament decided that December 31, 1996 would be the day that the Coroners Act 1995 would come into effect?

9. Why did Ray Groom step down from the premiership, with no provocation, six weeks before the massacre and take up the portfolio of attorney general?

10. The Psychiatry Department of the University of Melbourne was started by Tavistock. Do they still run it?

11. According to Ian Matterson who was coroner in 1996, the foresight of Ray Charleton in obtaining a large mortuary truck before the event was much appreciated. Why did he think it would be needed?

12. Why did Anthony Nightingale (said to be an ASIO man) shout “Not here” when the gunman started shooting in the Broad Arrow Café?

13. Jim Laycock saw one of the shootings that day. He had known Martin as a boy and as an adult, and he said Martin was not the shooter. Did this constitute evidence of Martin’s innocence in Judge Cox’s eyes?

14. When the SAS came over to Tassie on the ferry a few days before the massacre, where did they camp?

15. Why did a female psychiatrist, Dr Ireland, take Walter Mikac to see the bodies of his wife and children on the morning after they were killed, still lying on the road?

16. What about the newsman who doctored the eyes in a photo of Martin to make him look like a maniac? He said he did not intend this result – it was accidental. Did he ever change that story to be more in keeping with reality?

17. Maurice Bryant, the Dad of Martin and Lindy, was found in a dam, having suicided. Why did he leave a note on the front door saying “Call the police,” but not leave a goodbye note for his wife?

18. Terrance Hill said he had confiscated Bryant’s gun before the massacre. So why did Damian Bugg hold up another gun as belonging to Martin?

19. What of the fact that there would have been easy proof of the gunman’s identity via fingerprints on the Solo can, but his tray was ignored by police “forensics”?

20. Is it true that Tasmania passed special legislation to remove Martin’s assets, thus depriving him of money to hire an attorney?

21. How did psychiatrist Paul Mullen, who interviewed Bryant in hospital May 5th 1996, come to be living in Aramoana, NZ, in 1990 when a 33-year old man, David Gray, shot 13 neighbors dead and set a house blaze?

22. What is the connection, if any, between the shooting at Dunblane in March 1996, and the shooting at Port Arthur?

23. Why couldn’t Port Arthur Historic Site employee Stephen Howard get the authorities to answer questions about his wife Elizabeth’s death in the Broad Arrow Café?

Postscript. I wrote the above list for my fellow Australians, who will understand that it is a satire. The media coverage on this case has been “second to none.” Well, maybe second to the Boston Globe’s coverage of the marathon bombing, though it’s a hard call.

Question 4 above has something to do with “the fodder note”. In regard to this, it has to be said that the recent revelations by Fiona Barnett in Oz and Wendy Hoffman in Brooklyn (re Satanism) are due to shake everything up.

Thank God.

My reading of the fodder note starts at 2.45 minutes:

— Mary W Maxwell is author “Fraud Upon The Court: Reclaiming the Law, Joyfully” (2015). She writes for GumshoeNews.com in Melbourne.
—
Link below to many more articles about Port Arthur.