Saying Goodnight to False Flags and Good Morning to Open Thuggery

by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB

It seems to me that we have entered a new phase this week in government thuggery. I am referring to the smashing of the windshields of the Canadian truckers and the use of radiation weapons on the Canberra protestors. The Big Boys apparently think they no longer have to pretend they are doing A when they are really doing B.

They don't have to construct a false-flag event and blame it on someone. They can say "We did it! Hooray for us! Right on!" This new thought -- that false flags are over and done with -- has caused me to review some of the big false flags. By now it's very easy to see their standard pattern. By God, it's embarrassing.

I will choose seven and show that, each time, the perpetrator was identified as a terrorist or a nutcase, that they died at the site or were arrested, that the official narrative was accepted unquestioningly by the judge, that the top man in the respective nations did some cheerleading for new legislation, and that a whistleblower type told the truth but was ignored.

These seven cases are the ones that I know best. To wit: the Oklahoma City bombing of a federal building in 1995, the Dunblane killing of children in Scotland in 1996, the Port Arthur massacre in Australia in 1996, the downing of the Twin Towers in New York in 2001, the school shooting at Sandy Hook in Connecticut in 2012, the Marathon bombing in Boston in 2013, and the Lindt Cafe hostage taking in Sydney in 2014.

I'll ask these six questions:
1. Who was blamed for the event?
2. How was he disposed of?
3. What did a trial or investigation reveal?

4. Who was the top man in the respective nation?
5. What new legislation resulted from the event?
6. Did any whistleblower types come forward?

In the Official Narratives, Who Got Blamed?

OKC -- Timothy McVeigh ("extremist")
Dunblane -- Thomas Hamilton ("oddball")
Port Arthur -- Martin Bryant ("low IQ")
Nine Eleven -- Osama bin Laden ("jihadist")
Sandy Hook -- Adam Lanza ("sad loner")
Boston -- the Tsarnaev brothers ("terrorists")
Sydney -- Man Haron Monis ("religious kook")

How Did the Alleged Bad Guy Get Disposed Of?

OKC -- McVeigh arrested, tried, and executed
Dunblane -- Hamilton killed himself onsite
Port Arthur -- Bryant "confessed," still in jail
Nine Eleven -- bin Laden killed, after a war failed to suffice
Sandy Hook -- Lanza killed himself onsite
Boston -- Tamerlan killed in custody, Jahar still in prison
Sydney -- Monis shot dead by police at the scene

What Came Out at Trial, or Inquest, or Investigation?

OKC -- Judge Matsch: McVeigh used a homemade bomb
Dunblane -- Lord Cullen: Hamilton loved guns
Port Arthur -- Judge Cox: Bryant was quite the sharpshooter
Nine Eleven -- Commissioner Kean: 19 Arabs flew the planes
Sandy Hook -- State Attorney Sedensky: Lanza shot Mom first
Boston -- Judge O'Toole: Jahar studied bombs on the Internet
Sydney -- Coroner Barnes: Monis had demanded an ISIS flag

Who Headed the Respective Nation at the Time?

OKC, '95 -- US President Bill Clinton
Dunblane, '96 -- UK Prime Minister John Major
Port Arthur, '96 -- Australian Prime Minister John Howard
Nine Eleven, '01 -- US President George W Bush
Sandy Hook, '12 -- US President Barack Obama
Boston Marathon, '13 -- Us President Barack Obama
Sydney Cafe, '14 -- Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott

What New Legislation Resulted from the Event?

OKC -- the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
Dunblane -- Firearms (Amendment) Act of 1997
Port Arthur -- National Firearms Agreement of 1996
Nine Eleven -- The Patriot Act of 2001
Sandy Hook -- CT law against releasing autopsy photos of minors
Boston -- None, but smiles for the Special Administrative Measures that prevent communicating with a terrorist in prison
Sydney -- Eight tranches of national security legislation in 2015

Did Any Whistleblower Types Come Forward?

OKC -- Officer Terence Yeakey found explosives in the building.
Dunblane -- Lord Burton hinted guilt of the Speculative Society.
Port Arthur -- Officer Pat Allen reported the police stand-down.
Nine-Eleven -- Cabinet member Norman Mineta testified that Cheney forbade interception of the 911 plane at the Pentagon
Sandy Hook -- Coroner Carver mused "I hope this doesn't come crashing down on our heads."
Boston -- Ibragim Todashev knew too much, had to be killed by FBI
Sydney -- I know too much, ain't sayin' nuffink.

Good Night and Good Morning

As stated, this recap of seven false flags marks a closing off. I, for one, will refuse to handle any more false flags (well, I do have a half a file on Charlottesville, OK?). My efforts over the last several years were devoted (I think) to showing fellow Americans and fellow Australians that those flags were very false and hence the governments were criminal. Hardly anyone would listen; I've never made a single convert.

My claim is that this week's new brutality is not being hidden from the public. The government wants us to see it, and feel it, so we'll resign ourselves to the new brutal normal. I am absolutely ashamed that we did not prevent this new stage, by closing in with some prosecutions, earlier. However, it's not too late to sharpen up, is it?

The video'd woman at Canberra (actually she was video'd after she crossed the border back into her home state of Queensland) showed her wounds from the radiation attack. She kept saying "This has got to be punishable." Yay. A perfectly sane statement. Like "Dogs bark." or "Grass is green." "This has got to be punishable."

A Superb Book, from 2013, by Lance deHaven-Smith

A friend sent me a great book, called "Conspiracy Theory in America," that I had never heard of. It discusses the weirdness of the fact that Americans of the 21st century have been unwilling to pin blame on government, given that such pinning is a big part of our tradition.

A very interesting point that the author, Lance deHaven-Smith, makes is that we used to pin blame on specific individuals (King George, Aaron Burr, Jefferson Davis, etc.), rather than vaguely blaming "government." I recommend that we return to that practice. Why not?

Here is a lengthy quote from pages 63-64 of Lance deHaven-Smith's book, abridged:

[Thomas] Jefferson formed a new political party and defeated Adams in the presidential election of 1800. In his first inaugural address, Jefferson articulated the principle, now widely cherished as a birthright, that Americans are allowed by the Constitution to “think freely and to speak and to write what they think.” He made it clear that in his view this was true even for speech advocating the overthrow of the government. In Jefferson’s words, “If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.” [Jeepers!]

[Ergo], Congress let the Sedition Act expire in 1801. Jefferson was also influential in establishing the precedent for investigating and prosecuting suspicions of antidemocratic conspiracies by top leaders. As president, he advocated the prosecution of Aaron Burr for treason in what came to be called the “Burr conspiracy.” [Jefferson urged] the federal courts to hold Burr accountable for crimes he may have committed after leaving office. [Ah, those were the days! See Zephyr Teachout's book "Break 'em Up" for an update.]....

When Jefferson made it clear he was going to drop Burr from the Democratic-Republican ticket in the 1804 election, Burr ran for governor of New York, and Hamilton campaigned against him. ... Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel in which Hamilton was killed. During his second term as president, Jefferson voiced his belief that Burr was leading a conspiracy to form a separate nation by breaking away western lands from U.S. control. Fortunately for the nation’s future, Jefferson was not dismissed as a harebrained lunatic. This was long before political elites and pundits tried to convince Americans that conspiracy theories are a form of flawed reasoning akin to superstition. [See what I mean?]

Jefferson’s suspicion was based on reports that Burr had approached several friends, one of whom was a high-ranking officer in the U.S. Army, with a scheme to establish an independent nation in the west. Jefferson urged federal prosecutors to take action, and Burr was tried for treason.

[Is any reader getting a notion here?]

For the next hundred years, American statesmen regularly voiced suspicions regarding antidemocratic conspiracies when circumstantial evidence suggested hidden intrigue. Nineteenth-century conspiracy theories included, among others, Andrew Jackson’s allegations of a “corrupt bargain” between John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay to give the presidency to Adams in 1824. [Wow, that would be small beer today!],

[Also], Abraham Lincoln’s charge, made on the floor of the House of Representatives, that President Polk had fabricated a reason to initiate the Mexican-American War...] and the theory that the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was intentionally drafted by railroad-connected Congressmen to precipitate court rulings granting the rights of individuals to corporations;

[Plus] suspicions that, contrary to the government’s claims in launching the Spanish-American War, the U.S. battleship Maine had not been sunk by a Spanish mine but had been deliberately sunk by U.S. or Cuban operatives to precipitate the war [i.e., a false flag]. [Lusitania, anyone? How about the Belgrano?]

The conspiracy-theory literature overlooks not only the conspiracism of the Founders, but also America’s history of innovation and reform to deal with new and changing forms of political corruption [too right, Mate].

-- end of quote from "Conspiracy Theory in America" (2013), published by the University of Texas Press.

By the way, the first chapter in that book has a telling title: "High Crime Blind." Consider the high crime of two skyscrapers in New York City being demolished, with people in them, during business hours, in full sight of onlookers. And another one, Building 7, being given the heave-ho six hours later, for no good reason. And all around the nation, folks being blind to the real perp.

Good night, false flags.

Good morning, open thuggery. I'll be seeing you in court.

A Video from October 2015, at the Opera House

I've shown this video before. It is a reminder that the 50 state governors have immense power to deal with trouble, including, in Massachusetts, to ride out on horseback, leading the militia, against any INVADERS. The link below is to my book "Keep the Republic, Kill the Takeover." It has enhanced relevance now that we see that the thuggery in Canada was performed by foreigners, including the ever-indictable Klaus Schwab of the disgusting WEF.

-- Mary W Maxwell ran for the Republican nomination in New Hampshire's presidential primary in 2020, came in third (a distant third) behind President Trump and Governor Weld. She writes for GumshoeNews in Australia. She is old and sometimes cannot remember which country she is in. Her latest books are "Unreality: Sandy Hook Messes Minds" and "Keep the Republic, Kill the Takeover," a pdf of which is downloadable (love that word) below. Please spread this article around. We're not going to take the new thuggery lying down, are we?