(Thanks,M. :)

Reader MA writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Anna Von Reitz: 'Oh, Ye....'

I comprehend what Anna is revealing.
Two issues.
1. A legal maxum
A creation is Not greater than its creator.
2. RCMP is a creation.

Those employees of RCMP have not established anything separate from what they are presumed to be; ie. They have not performed Anna Von Reitz process for identifying as who they are in life.

The people arrested have not done tge Anna Von Reitz process to identify who thwy really are.

The people arrested will do as they are told.
Walk over here.
Stand there
Sign this
Put this on
Accept this person to speak for you.
Trust this person to care for your free.
Agree to these terms, etc.

There is more to freedom than protest.
A free man can protest his free and his child can contract back into slavery.

Remeber the phrase freedom is not free.

The double meaning is the definition of freedom is not the same definition as free.

Seeking one will not lead to the resukts of the other.

I remeber being in a judicial forum iver some none sense (nonsense) and speaking of my unalienable rights.

The man who controlled the room had a smirk on his face and challenged me for whether I was saying unalienable or inalienable.

I had no idea there was two words that sounded similar but was not the same.

There is no need to discuss whether I answered right or wrong as the point I am making is,

In the beginning was the word.
The word was "God"
The word was "of God"

Anna is teaching how we have been removed from God to "of God" with words.

I am showing how words can determine your positiin as a creatiin or a creator.

I am showing how obeying the words of another will cast you under their control with your consent to obey.

I am showing you how similar words do not mean the same.

It is impossible to think you "understand" anything spoken to you in their court.

The words have their own meanings.

A man in court is a corporation by their own legal definition.
A woman or child is a man and therefore a corporation.

You have to have someone speak their language to represent the corporate body.

Only you control the corporate body.

Remember the word corporal punishment.

Similar but not the same.

A corporation has arms of the corporation.
Head of the corporation.
It is a corporate body.
It does.not hear, speak, think.
It must be represented by someone who can hear, speak, think.
That is you, until you acceot someone to soeak for it, for you.

You are corporeal
Recognize the real in the word.

There is a lot to learn but at least people try and fail and don't give up trying.

Anything you acceot from them is without full disclosure.
Anything you agree to IS as if you have full knowledge to agree.

Stop agreeing.
Stop understanding.

Just say no.

That is your power, to stop accepting them telling you where ti stand, what to wear, who to accept to speak foe your corporate body, what to sign.

You have the right to remain silent for a reason.

Anything you say WIll be used against you for a reason.

Tell them you will be silent
And be silent.

That means not signing things they ask you to agree to.
There IS NO full disclosure.

You will agree to things they do to you that you don't agree to.

They will reference that signature without telling you and they will keeo acting against you and it will be your fault for agreeing.

A signture is an agreement.

(Tele)vision shows uch as Law and Order
Tell a vision is to teach you what they need you to do so they can msintwin control.

Anyone you do not know is a stranger.
Unfamiliar person.

Remember "stranger danger"
Learn from these sayings spiken to a chikd who "does not undestand".

Its best to not understand.

They did not teach you how to avoid their traps like they teach their own

Be well.
Stay out of agreements by gesture.
A handshake is just as binding as a signature.
Holding hands is binding in legal settings.
Some may remember holding hands with a representative before a verdict.
Some may have signed so much away, holding hands was unnecessary when the representative accepted some decision for you and left you to satisfy the terms "of their agreement".

If you accepted them to speak for you (your corporate body), them they have done no wrong in the eyes of the Creator.

All men are endowed by the Creator with certain unalienable rights.
Unalienable rights cannot be contracted away, even if you wanted to.
Inalienable rights can be contracted away. You can have someone represent your interest in your lufe and liberty with a contract that Is Not full discloure that you are contracting away the rights you use with your corporate body.

You are corporeal.
They can't recognize you.
They recognize the corporate body.

If they recognized you, where you are js where you are at.
The "You are here' sign at a kiosk in a mall.

The corporate body makes an "appearance".

You are not studied in their darkness to know what they do.

Thats why you should never agree to anything they offer to you, especially agreement to sign.

I am not a lawyer (IANAL)
I do not want to be a lawyer.
I do not represent you.
I do not give legal advice, only a lawyer can give legal advice.

***************************************************************************