(Thanks, C. :)
Reader Charles Miller writes:
=====
Dear Hobie.
Last week I sent you a video addressing some of the positions in the ASSEMBLY confusion presently heating up, again.
Fair representations of all positions is what the First Amendment is all about.
Some how I made the mistake of engaging with a couple of these characters via email.
Me being me I loaded them up with published pieces.
One of which is the British Ambassador duly served publish of 2018.
Low and behold I got what I deserved.
One of the people made the statement that the 1783 Treaty of Peace was a FRAUD.
Below please find my response and invitation, tongue in cheek, to continue to engage with principles,facts, law and procedures serving the notion that all law is contract, private between the parties and deals with property and property rights.
As always thank you for your hard work and dedication.
I somehow sense 2022 is going to be a bang up year.
RESPONSE TO SOME ASSEMBLY MEMBERS POSITIONS.
Ron, please show me the proof from documented and verified open public sources supporting your statement that the 1783 Treaty of Peace is Fraud.
As you should know, naked statements made with out well sourced and evidence facts fail for lack of substance.
Calling some thing a fraud with out substance exposing the fraud is the refuge of weak minded usually attempting to escape from responsibility to be fully informed and knowledgeable.
As with so many you seem to hold the position that your belief supersedes the very foundations that provides the right, and a protected by law position, to hold your belief.
Yet at the same time you refuse to recognize the documented contract verified by not only the People in 1783, yet the nations of the world as owned by their Kings under franchise from the Holy See.
Your belief and all the alleged support relied on are naked of any foundation under a few simple direct points of fact and law.
Attempting to re-construct the past to address present conditions is an exercise in insanity much like beating your head against the wall the same way and expecting different results. SEE # 21 & 22 for on point identification of mistakes foundation.
1. July 4, 1776, a bunch of subjects, property of their King, declared before the world that they owned them selves and told their master the Kings ownership of the American People was void under the Kings own obligations to his subjects. The Magna Chata is a property ownership contract. We the Barons agree to be the Kings subjects under the following conditions and we will enforce that across the land and bind all Englishmen everywhere.
2. War was engaged fully to settle the issue as was the practice set up by the coven of Kings and related property owners of subjects. These same Kings under Vatican franchise had their subjects such as Vatell, Poofendorff and others write the Laws of Nations and Warfare. As subjects every thing these writers did belongs to, is owned by their Master. The private property of Kings created or allegedly owned by their subjects serves only the owner of the subjects.
3. The contest for ownership over subjects called the Revolutionary War ended with the Treaty of Peace 1783.
4. The good King George RELEASED before the world his ownership in all lands, governments, proprietary properties, chattel property as in subjects, people, at Article I of the treaty. King George as direct representative speaking as the Vatican bound his principal and all other Vatican franchised entities.
4. The legal, political and prior absolutely enforceable ownership in people, lands and governments on the soil of North America titled to the King by the Vatican was CANCELLED by the owners agents, also subjects re-presenting their owner, when the Treaty was agreed and executed as a public record in the name of King George.
5. This is the root of the Liberty you so adamantly seek.
6. Failure to recognize and honor the foundation of your right to choose the political jurisdiction you live in and under creates an incomplete foundation.
7. Incomplete foundations always fail to support what is built on them. The Peoples house of our Democratic Republic perhaps?
8. My country the United States of America was created by the People alive in 1776. That country has two fundamental jurisdictions. The Peoples Orginal Jurisdiction, and the resulting American People created jurisdiction called governments constructed for the sole purpose to serve and protect its constructors, the American People. Secondary jurisdictions as derivative of the first primary jurisdiction are servants to the first jurisdiction creating the second.
9. The Peoples Original Jurisdiction is the superior and controlling jurisdiction because the creators of anything are always the owners. See the preambles to the Declaration, original State constitutions, Articles of Confederation, the national constitution and particularly preamble to the Bill of Rights for the declaration of title and ownership.
Who are the parties and what do they own?
10. The 1783 treaty recognized and verified world wide your right to choose. So if you say the source of your power to choose is a fraud, how valid are your statements or acts?
11. The treaty also validated before the world, to all the other people in other jurisdictions, the American People’s form of self constructed government.
12. This single fact is the very foundation of why our country became the light of the world and people from every where wanted to come here. More to the point this fact caused all the slave jurisdictions holding subjects by force to be challenged to the point their survival was at risk. This point is the place these slave jurisdictions joined in creating the attacks to destroy the very concept of self recognized and self actuated Liberty, or the right to choose the form of government one associates themselves too.
13. NOTE: Any one not having standing in a jurisdiction that could protect them is the target and subject to being held by force to the position of human capital to be managedwirhout recourse.
14. Your position giving the English Crown the credibility of position to hold you to any thing, hold powers over the American Peoples land as released under treaty, is abandonment of the field of battle over control. What more does an enemy need than concession and leaving the field by their adversary. Is that what passes for patriots understanding in the Assemblies?
14. Your reference points in the other emails are all drawn from the servants position. In other words you are defining your positions from the powers We the People assigned by constitution to our public servants. The People are the Masters. That’s what the foundation documents define as fact and law. Your reference points drawn from servants positions when used to define and control your acts or positions admits and confesses you define your self as subject to servants operations. Voluntary servitude is recognized by definition when anyone defines themselves under another’s standards.
15. As far as your declaration witnessed by two others go, I have serious questions as to what you expect that to mean to me or any one else?
16. What credibility do you believe I should assign to your witnessed declaration, made on the land of my country, when you refuse to recognize the very source of the political, legal and lawful source executing the right to choose for all of man kind?
17. How does the Peoples Jurisdiction covering the soil of Oregon State as constructed under the treaty recognitions of political and personal Liberty you refuse to recognize, honor you or protect you? Particularly when by your own admission you have no legal or political relationship to that first and still valid and in force jurisdiction?
18. Claiming to be a beneficiary of the public trust entitled the State of Oregon requires two elements before the claim could be even be considered substantive enough to consider. First, the public trust as created by the People’s contract called a Constitution must be recognized. Second, a personal relationship to that contract must be evidence.
19. Claims of beneficiary standing and capacity are a trespass when these two elements are not of public record. No public record - no standing. The trespass is not only on the trust yet more to the point legitimate beneficiaries. Incomplete beneficiaries claims dilute legitimate standing which devolves in to democracy where 51% rule over 49%.
20. As far as ‘noticing U.S. DOJ’ goes we enter into no brainer territory. Please explain to me how notice to the derivative authority, US Government, constructed as an LLC by the State's United, holds any authority over you! This question is particularly relevant when Article VII Constitution is read and the constructing parties are identified. Who is on first? Even mor relevant is why any one complaining about corrupt federal government ever believe a notice to the known crooked public servants would be of substantive value for recognition of you as a real Citizen having standing of a beneficiary.
21. The flow principles, facts, law and procedure dictates absolutely that in order for you to achieve true beneficiary standing the party, exclusive party, holding authority or power in all the contexts you seem to want to operate in, is the State of Oregon. This is because that’s the place where the People joined together to creat a public trust operating as a government to serve the People constructing the trust.
22. Maxims of Equity: Equity will not allow a statute to be used as a cloak for fraud; Equity regards the beneficiary as the true owner; Equity will not allow a trust to fail for want of a trustee. If there is no trustee, whoever has legal title to the trust property will be considered the trustee.
For any American to give credibility to any public servants interpretation or reconstruction of the documents the servants promised and are paid to recognize and serve, that American identifies themselves as a subject to the public servants. This my friend is self imposed voluntary servitude.
Why would the Master, the People, ever need their servants pontification to validate the Masters contracts, standings and capacities?
Is the failure to properly recognize Ron as the Master a TORT upon which all corrupt government operations rests?
Does the tortfeasor have any defensible position?
Please read the Preamble to the Oregon Constitution and the National Constitution, in context of a contract and identify the parties to the contract, the properties held by the contract constitutions and the use of the properties authorized by the constitutions, then please explain to me how the People’s governments ever went any where, how and in what public record We altered our form of government. Failing that the proof of fraud and 90 % of the pa-trid-idiots bull shit that some secret squirrel or special non disclosed position or document stole our country, dissolves in the light of the principles, facts, la, procedures through application of common sense.
I recognized years and years ago that blaming the government which is a concept memorialized on paper, is a dead end and the escape clause and mechanism guaranteeing corruption will rule.
Paper and words and concepts can not think or act which means the government created by the words on paper is not corrupt.
I also recognized that until the individuals operating and benefiting from crooked government operations managing human capital are held to account nothing will change.
I sent you a number of articles that may change you thought process and tune up the dealing with facts, law and procedure value to you which hopefully will allow you to recognize some of your beliefs could use a review.
Please show me, cause I always like to learn and have the facts and law correct, the facts leading you to believe the 1783 Treaty of Peace is a fraud.
*************************************************************
