Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist
http://82.221.129.208/.yb8.html

MICHAEL FRAUD BUSTED

I'll just keep this simple. This top part of this page will not change so it can be linked out and be the same as you link it. Here goes.

With any hurricane there will be pictures of damage, because all hurricanes do damage. The type of damage says it all. And in the case of Michael, the type of damage indicates most winds were 80 mph with one small section at around 90 mph. It was not the 155 mph super storm and I can prove it.

In order to scam the world with a carbon tax, hurricanes are being lied about so the now "frequent high intensity and occurrence" of hurricanes can justify the mantra on global warming, and scam the public into thinking we are destroying the planet. Every storm is now the storm of a lifetime, and I am sick of it. So let's get this ball rolling.

To show how bad Michael was, Drudge posted this:

This is a storm surge shot, and all hurricanes have storm surge. look in the background on the businesses. All the windows are intact, and if the winds were 155 mph none would have been in one piece from over stress alone, and with all that debris there that would have been thrown into them. So what we have here is a picture where a wave washed something in. Nice board through the wind shield for drama, but that can happen with mundane storms.

Let's compare this shot from 155 mph Michael with a damage shot from 130 mph Harvey that happened last year:

Another shot of Harvey's 130 mph wind damage (there are many like this from Harvey)

Harvey had winds that were supposed to be 25 mph less than Michael. Yet the damage characteristics for Michael don't add up to that.

Let's cut to the chase. Hurricane Charley made landfall with wind speeds of 150 mph, which is 5 mph less than the advertised wind speed for Michael. Furthermore, Michael scored a direct hit on Panama City with those "155 mph winds". The following photos are from Charlie. If Michael has no broad spanning photos of widespread devastation, they lied about Michael. Everything from Michael is close tight shots where something happened in a small setting. Michael should instead be producing wide setting photos like these:

Hurricane Charley was supposed to be less of a hurricane than Michael. If we don't see these types of photos from Michael (and we won't) THEY LIED.

UPDATE:
The only photos coming out of Michael are storm surge photos (which I avoided using in photos of other hurricanes because all produce it and it is always damaging so it is not a reference) and things like pictures of downed trees, gas stations and other tight shots. Trees can go down in 70 mph winds. The 95 mph winds Michael produced would be tree doom (sic). 95 mph winds would knock gas stations over. But they won't produce pictures like the ones I posted from other hurricanes and therefore, even now after more pictures have come out, it is clear Michael had a fake rating.