(Thanks, C. :)

Reader C. sends us:

=====

https://www.rt.com/news/438719-air-india-plane-pilot-landing/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

THE BOEING 777 MENTIONED BELOW HAD ITS COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM SHUT OFF. THE ELITE IN AMERICA WERE DEFINITELY GOING TO DO ANOTHER 911 THIS YEAR IN NEW YORK CITY, AND FOR WHATEVER REASON, IT DID NOT WORK OUT.

POSSIBLE 911 (2018) TERROR ATTACK REMOTE HIJACK FAILURE-JimStoneFreelance-9/18/18

A Boeing 777-300 from Delhi India to New York lost all flight control systems as it approached New York, and the pilot had to land it manually like a Cessna. Unlike Airbus, if a Boeing loses flight control systems they can still be flown, but it is unbelievably difficult because the pilot has to push like hell on the controls (the same way steering and brakes get difficult with no engine running in a car) except it's worse because it is a huge airplane) With Airbus, there's no connection at all once the electronics are lost, and you die.
A
ANYWAY: QUESTION: Why did a Boeing 777-300 mysteriously lose all flight controls as it approached New York on 9/11? One from India no less? Most likely it was a remote hijack situation that for whatever reason (maybe maintenance did not solder a wire right because it is India) or they did something unexpected because it was from India, and the remote takeover did not work as planned.
This stinks to high hell, and I'd like to know why we are only hearing about it now, and then had to get it from Russia Today (RT)!

************************************************************