If the US government can lie to the world about a chemical attack in a foreign country what is to stop them from doing the same thing against Americans on US soil? How do you defend yourself against a false flag attack, with a complicit press and an over eager military if they created a false flag on American soil and pointed the finger at the "domestic terrorists of their choice? If they can control the military and the press to that extent what is to stop them from fabricating the same false flag in the US? How do you defend yourself from such an insidious and diabolical scheme? If they get away with this blatant lie on this scale it can also be used against US citizens with complete success, with no way to defend against it. That is the power of politicians that get away with lying and are never called on it. If that is ever done here a person's Constitutional rights would have no value whatsoever. You would be guilty by government decree, vilified in the press and vaporized by cruise missiles - All in the same week.

George Eaton

http://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/383225-haley-chemical-attack-could-happen-in-us-if-were-not-smart

Snip

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley defended U.S. strikes on Syria following a suspected chemical attack in the country, saying on Sunday that a similar attack could happen in the U.S. if precautions are not taken.

“This very easily could happen in the United States if we're not smart, and if we're not conscious of what's happening," Haley told Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday."

“We have to be very conscious of the fact that we cannot allow even the smallest use of chemical weapons. That's why you saw the president strike this past weekend, that's why you saw him expel 60 Russian spies after the attack in Salisbury," she said, referring to the poisoning of a former Russian spy and his daughter with a nerve agent on British soil last month.

Haley's comments come days after the U.S., in partnership with France and the U.K., launched over 100 missiles at three targets in Syria.

The attack was aimed at taking out Syria's chemical weapons facilities, though the strikes were limited and reports have already suggested they may have had a minimal impact on Syria's capability.