A judge said to somebody; “The chicken has the right to live but the fox has the right to live too”, then this judge left the room.
This statement of this...shall we say, not so smart judge, falls into the same line of reasoning as of Pilate who had a similar reply THEN LEFT after he said; “what is truth”. Pilate wasn't interested to hear the reply and neither this, not so smart judge in the above example.
Let's ASSIGN (lol) to this, not so smart judge a “Public Defender” as THEY do it all the time to others.
By the way, no judge supposed to exist, neither kings, queens, prime ministers, presidents, priests, pastors, etc. ALL of these entities are USURPING AUTHORITY and CHANGE the LEADER title to their respective PRETENSE. Since they are PRETENDERS and FAKES and USURPERS OF AUTHORITY, they are PHONY “LEADERS”.
Because these PRETENDERS and FAKES and USURPERS OF AUTHORITY ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO EXIST, DO THEY HAVE ANY, ANY, ANY “RIGHTS”, ESPECIALLY the RIGHT TO EAT???
THE CHICKEN DOES EXIST, BECAUSE OF NATURE. ALL OF THESE PRETENDERS AND FAKES AND USURPERS OF AUTHORITY WITH THEIR PHONY TITLES HOWEVER, EXIST BECAUSE THEY CREATED THEIR OWN ARTIFICIAL CLIQUE, CABAL, CAUCUS, GUILD, CIRCLE AND THEY LIVE OFF OF THE PEOPLE.
DO THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXIST?
ACCORDING TO THEM “YES”.
DO THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXIST (EAT) TO THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS?
BY THE “VEILED” ANSWER OF THAT NOT SO SMART JUDGE, “YES” BUT THEY DON'T REALLY ADVERTISE THIS, BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRAID, IF THEIR SCAM BECOMES KNOWN, THE PEOPLE WILL “EAT” THEM.
That not so smart judge stated; “the fox has the right to live”.
You see reader the unbelievable DISHONESTY, ARROGANCE and WORD GAME of this judge?
He only said that “the fox has the right to live”. HE IMPLIED, IMPLIED, IMPLIED “the fox has the right to live” BY EATING THE CHICKEN.
Let's do this again, shining more light to the matter!
Does “the fox have the right to live” BY EATING THE CHICKEN?
The answer is IMMATERIAL, because of the usage of the word “right”. VERY IMPORTANT!
Does “the fox have the authority to live” BY EATING THE CHICKEN?
DEFINITELY NOT, NOT, NOT, because of the usage of the word “authority”!
WHEN YOU DESERT, GIVE UP, ABANDON, SELL, YOUR, YOUR, YOUR “AUTHORITY”, TO CONDUCT YOUR LIFE THE WAY YOU SEE FIT, WITHOUT HARMING OTHERS AND ADOPT THEIR, THEIR, THEIR “RIGHTS”, YOU “SIGNED YOUR DEATH WARRANT” OR IN OTHER WORDS, YOU “GAVE YOUR SOUL TO THE DEVIL”.
The status quo legal/justice system adopted and implemented the statement of Mao; “power comes from the barrel of a gun”.
When you gave up your AUTHORITY and exchanged it to their RIGHTS, you ACCEPTED their terms and conditions of THEIR RIGHTS. They are NOT “YOUR RIGHTS”! When you ACCEPTED “RIGHTS”, the terms and conditions can be taken away by those who gave them to you. If you ACCEPT their “RIGHTS” they OFFER you, you GIVE AWAY your “AUTHORITY”. When you gave up your AUTHORITY, and replaced it with their RIGHTS, now THEY HAVE AUTHORITY OVER YOU, BECAUSE YOU ABANDONED YOUR AUTHORITY AND THEY PICKED IT UP!
In a sense, you threw away your gold crown and accepted a paper hat from them and proudly walking around, wearing that paper hat.
Do you call this an EQUAL exchange?
Obviously NOT, BUT you VOLUNTARILY GAVE AWAY your gold crown to replace it with their paper hat.
When you see a venomous snake, do you trust it?
Do you trust a man that comes to you and say (as Reagan put it); “I am from the Government and I am here to help you”?
People are flooding to Trump; “He arrived at just the right time”, as you'll hear it in one of the links below, if you care to watch it.
In the case of the fox and the chicken, the fox takes away the chicken's “right” to live, because “power comes from the barrel of a gun”. Strength.
Who gave the fox the AUTHORITY, to take away the natural AUTHORITY of the chicken to live?
Strength and force.
When good ol triple agent Benji walked out of that infamous meeting, people asked him. “What kind of Government do we have?”
Benji replied; “Republic...if you can keep it”. Obviously, the people couldn't keep it.
Force was/is always used to subjugate others. The status quo entities use FORCE to force their “RIGHTS” on people. Actually, what people call their “RIGHTS”, it is the “WILL” of those who created those “Rights” for the people to make them FEEL important. The status quo entities higher up on the food chain are true chameleons.
How many “Alternative Media” ever exposed this “Rights” DECEPTION?
They are either don't know or they are status quo mouthpieces. This UTTER STUPIDITY of “Rights” are going on for decades and NOBODY picked up on it!
How the Hell is this possible?
This not so smart judge stated “fox”, IMPLYING, that they are the “fox”, perhaps because of folklore legend statements such as “sly as a fox” and the people are the “chicken”, implying they are smarter than the people. They can con you any time they want to.
DO YOU SEE READER! DO YOU SEE READER! DO YOU SEE READER, WHY THE STATUS QUO ENTITIES ARE SO PERSISTENT, SO FORCEFUL ON “RIGHTS”?
DO YOU SEE READER?!
THEY GAVE/GIVE YOU THEIR ARTIFICIAL BULLSHIT ALL KINDS OF “RIGHTS” AND REPLACED/REPLACE THE GENUINE SUCH AS “LIVE”, “LIFE”, “TRAVELLING” AND MANY, MANY OTHERS WITH THEIR COUNTERFEITS. They created an artificial, legal world and they want YOU in it!
You think “women's rights” is something positive and beneficial to women?
You think that “civil rights” is something positive and beneficial to everybody?
Women used to have “Authority”, now they have “Rights”. One is genuine, the other is fake. The “genuine” is the old wooden cup, while the fake is the nice shiny cup.
Who would chose an old wooden cup to drink from?
People used to have “Authority”, now they have “Rights”. One is genuine, the other is fake. The “genuine” is the old wooden cup, while the fake is the nice shiny cup.
Who would chose an old wooden cup to drink from?
THE “SLY AS A FOX” STATUS QUO ENTITIES (THE HIGHER UPS) REPLACED, REPLACED, REPLACED (with your help) YOUR, YOUR, YOUR AUTHORITY, AUTHORITY, AUTHORITY, WITH THEIR “RIGHTS”, THEIR “WILL” AND PEOPLE SWALLOWED HOOKS LINES AND SINKERS!!! ONCE YOU ACCEPT ANY KIND OF THEIR “RIGHTS”, YOU ARE IN THEIR TRAP, BECAUSE YOU GAVE UP, GAVE UP, GAVE UP YOUR “AUTHORITY” AND ACCEPTED THEIR “WILL”, IN YOUR BELIEF TO BE “YOUR RIGHTS”!
A very informative video link below but there is constant reference to “RIGHTS” in it. Again, if you ACCEPT “rights” somebody else gives you, - whom you never even know, seen or heard - in place of YOUR “authority”, no offence but you are one SDMFR.
How about animals?
Do they have any “right”?
Well, the status quo entities thought of everything as they gave rights to animals too. Again, they successfully SUBSTITUTED “authority” with “right”. By the way, man is a human animal, according to them and you hear it all the time, in case it slipped by you, reader.
So, how about animals?
The status quo entities gave animals “rights”. I'm sure, the animals are cheering with joy.
How did/do the animals agree that the Humans gave them “rights”, with the end result to be killed for food?
Did the animals send you status quo entities a delegation?
Did you status quo entities had a meeting and discussed all the terms and conditions, agreed and each of you signed the contract?
YOU, YOU, YOU status quo entities gave the animals “rights”, so HOW, HOW, HOW did you do it?
Arbitrarily, according to your own whims and desires of your feeble, dumb minds. There was no delegation from the animal KINGDOM you negotiated with. You status quo entities HAVE NO IDEA how much trouble you are in!
Let me give you a REAL LIFE example about how an animal (pig in this case) WITH THE “RIGHTS” YOU BESTOWED ON IT, ENDS UP.
Put yourself into the position of a pig, that was selected to be killed by a family, because they have to eat.
DESCRIPTION BELOW IS GRAPHIC!
First, on the previous day, they separate the pig that is going to be killed from the rest. Then, they don't feed the pig but give water to it. That pig stays separate from the rest of the pigs all night long, communicating with the rest of the pigs through the cracks of the fence, trying to figure out what is going on, while scared to be alone.
Next day, early morning the crew comes. Usually, three, four men and a couple of women. One of the man carries a knife with a twelve inch solid blade, while one of the women carries a big metal pail. The men grab the pig anywhere they can. Ears, legs, tail, wherever and wrestle it to its side on the ground, while the pig is screaming and fighting.
The man who has the knife, goes and kneels on the side of the pig then trusts the knife straight into the pig's neck all the way as far as the blade could go, moving it around, in order to cut the main artery, that runs deep inside the neck of the pig, while a women with the pail holds the pail to the opening the knife made, where the fresh blood gushes out, constantly steering the blood so it won't gel as it will be used to make blood sausage later on.
All this time the pig is struggling, kicking, screaming rattling and moaning, as its blood goes into its lungs by its breathing, then as its blood pours out, slowly, its strength lessen and lessen then completely stops. No more breathing, no more blood flow. Then the men go inside and have drink.
This killing of the pig took about two minutes, not counting the struggle to wrestle it to the ground.
If you reader haven't seen this kind of killing, you have only a very faint idea of the event, from this description above. Believe me, you don't want to see it. Don't think for a moment that institutionalized “Humane” killings of animals are any better, with their “animal rights” fully enforced.
What do you think reader, how did the pig feel, from the moment it was separated from the rest, staying up all night long, then its struggle to live, then feeling that knife blade making its way into its neck, then feeling blood gushing out, screaming and gargling from the blood in the lungs, while getting weaker and weaker, then all black?
Where was this pig's “Animal right” unless his “right” was to die?
“Kosher” killing is basically the same, except the animal is hoisted up first, so its blood drains down.
Did you know reader, it is in the Koran that it is unlawful to sharpen the knife that is used to kill the animal, in front of the animal?
Do you know reader the definition of “Human being” in the early Ballantine law dictionary?
It is “monster”.
According to the title of the link below, the pigs are killed in a “monster's way” while the faithful government inspectors make sure they are herded, corralled to their deaths, according to status quo standards and policies.
What is the difference between those pigs in the link and humans?
Aren't humans constantly herded and corralled to certain directions?
With today's technology, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO KEEP LIVESTOCK FOR FOOD! To cater to all the meat eaters, the meat should be GROWN in sterile factories. Cloned from the best parts of the animal.
Artificial blood was created long time ago, in order to stop the animal mutilations and it virtually stopped. They just claimed recently, they cloned kidney tissue. Cloaning flesh shouldn't be any problem!
There is also "meat glue" used to glue meat pieces together to make steaks out of them. The technology is available TODAY, to completely eliminate the killings of animals for food.
WHY HADN'T BEEN DONE???
Let me give you a true story that happened in a slaughter house some time ago.
They had several animal killing crews in this slaughter house and they kept them rotating on a weekly basis, because the trauma of the killings of the animals caused to the crew members. One week one crew killed cows, then the next week they moved to kill chickens, etc.
In those days, they killed animals with knives.
This certain individual was with the crew that killed sheep and he was the one with the knife. When he got ready to kill this sheep, the sheep licked his hand he had the knife in. This guy broke down and quit his job on the spot.
What "Rights" will those animals have that will be SACRIFICED in Jerusalem in the temple?
These old, bloodthirsty MFRS are talking about the temple more and more.
Can you imagine reader, the stench, when these idiots will start burning those animal carcases?
Turism to Jerusalem will triple as the "faithful" will want to see those animals die and burned.
How will the Arabs respond to animal sacrifices, right beside their "Holy Mosque"?
The only solution is to spread a "New Discovery", that the "Temple" is really on a differnt spot, not where they thought is. Lol! Amazing what religious NUTS are capable of!
Unfortunately, the “Useful Idiots” (status quo or non status quo) always win! Gresham's Law proves this. The “inferior drives out the superior”.