From the reddit index thread at:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/795d6a/megaanon_postings_compiled_may_2017_present/?sort=new

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~[–]JohnChrisOstrem 1 point 7 hours ago

u/iMegaHateNickNames; Can you give us some red meat about the juicy Rosenstein-Ryan-Nunes sitch? Is there some sort of runaround going on that's going to screw Schiff? I don't understand why it matters whether he gets a chance to leak these docs early or not, I mean they are what they are right? Or is it the fear that people will know to flee?

A big effort post about that whole thing would be a big hit I think Megs. Or just whatever you can do.

Thanks.

~Fester

~~~~~[–]IMegaHateNicknames 8 points 6 hours ago

I'm purposefully not mentioning or focusing on this for a reason because anything we will hear or see on Rosenstein is fodder. It's like when you kill a spider in your house but they still kinda squirm so you flush for good measure of course, even though you know it'd never make it's way out of the trash can. Rosenstein going into Ryan's corridor is just squirming. Shit is getting VERY tight. It's stiff and desperate, in a good way. It feels clean. Purged for good measure, like the spider.

I'm not looking to be a big hit, but if I were, I wouldn't shine light on fluff. I'm really comfy on Rosenstein. I'm comfy on it all and I love when I can feel this way too.

~~~~~~[–]TempoNick 4 points 4 hours ago*

I don't understand what you wrote. Sometimes you make it sound like Rosenstein is helping to clean things up, other times you give the impression he's a black hat. Same thing with Mueller.

But I do have a suggestion that will make heads explode all over Washington. Trump should start pushing for a "build the wall" non-binding referendum, just like Brexit. And he should keep pushing for it. It's probably something that can't be done logistically, but it would be hilarious watching the amnesty types squirm.

~~~~~~[–]IMegaHateNicknames 7 points 2 hours ago

I think I come off this way because not for nothing, but depending on when I've posted what I have, both perspectives are relevant, which I've tried to clearly explain, but maybe I'm not doing a good enough job. Let me try again.

Rosenstein isn't a good guy and certainly isn't /ourguy/, from my perspective. Neither is Mueller. From my perspective over the last 15 years, you don't get to do the right things or make the right choices when your ass is on the line after the fact. Sure, you might not have been a willing participant in the swamps corruption, but the minute you even smelled the stank of the swamp, you should've resigned, if you were too afraid to go against it or report it. To me, guilty is guilty and it's equal crime, equal time, all around because I love the irony of equality! End of story.

That said, in reality, my perspectives do NOT match the legal ones. Nor do they consider or address the circumstances, complexities and pros/cons of things like negotiated plea deals, immunities, pardons offered in exchange of information, on an ICB, so there's that.

My point is that while I believe bad is bad, good is good, right is right, wrong is wrong and it's all equal, no matter how you slice and dice it, that's not how it works. Some people in the swamp aren't legally as bad, as corrupt, as guilty, etc. as others. Rosenstein and Mueller, aren't legally as bad as Hillary, McCain, Huma, Imran, DWS, the Podestas, Holder, Clapper, Brennan, McCabe, the Strzok type spooks, etc. They ARE however, as bad as Comey, Rice, Lynch, Mills, Lerner, Brazille, etc.

All to me, are equally fucked up and I'd convict sentence them all to the max. To the federal judicial system though, some are legally less guilty, therefore some were worth the deals in exchange for the more guilty. Well before Comey was even fired and as early as 2 months before Trump even won the election, people started coming out of the woodwork, willing and wanting to talk. Some who were far less guilty than any of those I've named above, did it because they saw the real polls and they knew he was on-trend to win and it excited them. They were good people, eager to help and escape the corruption. Those people were welcomed, very helpful and are fine. Others were cherry picked by the admin. and negotiated with to varied degrees. As I've said before, this was Bannon's role. Identify, present the pros/cons, benefits to leverage, etc. Bannon strategically started sifting through the swamp, that would in turn, set up the drain.

Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein all knowingly played a role in the swamp, just like they all knowingly played a role in the drain. That's why I probably sound conflicted. They "helped clean up" the messes they knowingly contributed to and left behind, in many ways. So it's hard to consider it "help" because it shouldn't have existed or need cleaning up in the first place.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~