(Thanks, L. :)
Reader L. writes:
***************************************************************************
Dear Hobie
Some news from the madness in France:
*Press release July 16th 2017 – google translate to French included *
*French banks, lawyers and bailiffs agree: Loans and mortgages are fake*
*Two mortgage banks, a legal company and bailiffs admit through an
affidavit now standing as truth and law in commerce, that loans and
mortgages in France are fake*.
Having used brutal force, lies and other commercial tricks, they have in
the course of almost three years done what they could to force a 60 year
old woman into contract and out of her home.
First they stole the money she paid to settle the alleged and undocumented
debt in full, then they auctioned the house she lives in – it is held in a
trust outside their jurisdiction – and finally they invited the legal
fiction with what resembles her given name, to accept an eviction and the
final destruction of all her earthly goods including her health, all held
in a trust.
She did not buy into it. Instead, on July 4th 2017 she gave them a final
chance to prove that there was a debt to justify their actions, by agreeing
with or disproving the statements of professor in banking and economy at
Southampton University in England, Richard Werner (
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/business-school/about/staff/werner.page#contact )
after his study of 5000 years of banking and to do so within 72 hours.
*a. Banks don’t take deposits and banks don’t lend money b. Banks borrow
money*
* from the public – they purchase securities/promissory notes c. What we
call deposits is the banks record of its debt to the public d. The public
is the bank’s creditor – not debtors *
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7asCJjv7QG0 *
As they all failed to disprove the affidavit, Caroline Favre de Thierrens
and Corine Thevenot Monceaux of Eleom Avocats in Nimes, the top management
of SMC bank in Marseille, CEO Bruno Deschamp and responsable d'unite Arnaud
Ramanoel, the top management of the mortgage bank CIF (Former BPI) Jerome
Lacaille and Philippe Theme and bailiffs Proner and Julien Ott agree that
there is and was no debt.
The statements of professor Richard Werner now stands as truth and law in
commerce and cannot be changed.
The case and claims of fraud, theft, disinformation, physical attack and a
complaint about the actions of the judge, the public prosecutor and
president of the court has been brought to the president of France Emmanuel
Macron and the Minister of Justice Christiane Taubira and to the Pope, the
highest authority in the maritime legal and financial system for these to
take immediate action.
The case is further being taken to an international court outside France.
For three years the mortgage bank BPI had ignored the legal demand to prove
the debt and on top an offer of out of court payment in full which in
itself cancels all debt. So says the law. That did not stop judge Claire
Ghera of Tribunal Grande Instance in Nimes to start a foreclosure process
even though she cannot interfere in cases where there is no dispute and
especially no debt.
Also the original wet ink “agreement” must be presented to start
foreclosure, but in France they can apparently just present a photo copy
and that is illegal. That is the same as paying with counterfeit money or
photo copied Euros. The mortgage Bank BPI (now CIF) had also forgot to
inform the woman that in reality it is a security they bought from her and
that she is the banks creditor and not their debtor.
Eventually Judge Claire Ghera accepted payment by a certified cheque
accompanied by a bank guarantee – same as cash and irreversible as the
funds were taken from the account of the woman and from that moment
belonged to the recipient – and the cheques were issued in court and
entrusted to lawyer Corine Thevenot Monceau of Eleom Avocats in Nimes in
September 2016. The law says that the moment she accepts a cheque the deal
is done.
The payment was issued to Carpa, the payment organisation for the Bar
Association in France, who did send it to their bank SMC in Marseille for
processing. It was correctly presented for payment to the issuing bank,
stamped as it must on both sides – and on October 12th 2016 a payment order
was sent to SMC, a normal bank to bank, ledger to ledger transfer
respecting Bills of Exchange act 1882 as it must. It too should have been
the end of the story but it was not.
Arnaud Ramanoel of SMC issued statements to the Bar Association that the
bank had received nothing – despite proof of the contrary. Without making
these documents available to the woman as they must, Judge Claire Ghera
ruled on behalf of the untrue statements only and ordered the property to
be sold on auction. Arnaud and his boss have admitted through affidavits
that the statements are untrue – which did not make any impression on the
court.
The theft of the almost €235,000 was reported to the police or gendarmerie
as it is called in France on September 4th 2016 in order to prevent the
auction planned on September 22nd 2016, and it was sent to the public
prosecutor, who apparently ruled on Novembe 18th 2016, but forgot to send
the letter till April 11th2017. It arrived at the trust address on May 15th
2017 with a big question mark on it.
The public prosecutor Laure Becceau – who left her job in Nimes by the end
of December 2016 - stated briefly that “there are no laws in France to
punish the parties for the claims” – which is the theft of about €235,000.:
*Le faits dont vous vous etes plaint ne sont pas punis par la loi (in
French from judgement)*
A press release and information letter was sent on July 7th 2017 o all
embassies in France, tourist offices, airlines, media, real estate agents
warning about the horrendous conditions in France and that nobody owning
property or having funds in France are safe.
They wanted it all – the funds, the property, the insurance money, the
Cestui Que funds, the payments done by the managing director of the trust
and which belongs to the trust and should have been paid back upon request
– that has been issued – like the original security ( loan document ) must
be given back to the owner upon request. Multiple demands have been ignored
too.
Vincent Mombellet - an alleged bailiff working as private and with no
authority or power in the jurisdiction of the trust - is agreeing that all
alleged debt has been paid and so are his clients. Still he attempts to
challenge this trust on behalf of alleged buyers who also agree that all
alleged – and non existing debt – is paid. It is both illegal and unlawful.
A documentary is being made about these conditions in France by German
television.
For further information please contact:
Lady Lisbeth Thuroe, Nielsson
Managing Director, The Ancora Universal foundation
e-mail: tauf.projects@gmail.com / LNielsson@gmail.com
--
The Ancora Universal foundation
Managing director Lady Lisbeth Thurø, Nielsson UCc 1-308
***************************************************************************