There has been no investigation into the chemical attacks that would prove that such an attack was made by the Syrian military. Although I am not 100% certain that the Syrian military didn't do this chemical attack, it is still unproven and unlikely. However, there are a lot of motives to blame Syria and exploit the incident. If Syria did this heinous act I would approve of Trump's reaction and more. But it doesn't make sense that Assad would go to that level when the war is 90% over. ISIS and the other terrorists groups are on the run and thousands have already been killed. There is literally no advantage for Assad to have a chemical attack take place, and numerous disadvantages. Trump gauged his decision based on photos and videos of the people that were killed which have an emotional effect on a person. The white hats that control the narrative on the ground have been known and proven to fake news reel evidence. The white hats were handling the victims without gloves and used dust masks which are both insufficient to avoid contact with that dangerous substance. Film crews were on site as they went into the terrorist bomb factory and they showed the labels of the chemical warfare material as it was discovered. The Syrian government openly confirmed they had bombed that town and it was possible the bombs hit the bomb factory which had chemical weapons stored inside - which caused the chemical release. Russia was not flying any bombing runs in that area. The revenge missile attack Trump ordered required days of preparation, and experts believe it was planned far in advance of the chemical incident. Also, if they believed that chemical weapons were taken from that Syrian base to be dropped on that town, it stands to reason that the missile attack would hit those chemical weapons and create a dangerous release of chemicals that would kill innocent people in that region. Experts commented that the US government knew that there were no such chemical weapons at the Syrian air force base, so bombing it would not be an issue. In my opinion this entire incident was set up and staged to allow the US government to do an about face in policies towards Syria and have the justification to punish Assad and further an offensive against Syria. In fact, months prior to this incident the US government shipped US military equipment from the US to Europe, then on rail to Romania and then shipped again to a port in Beirut, Lebanon and another location in southern Jordan. All for the express purpose of a land invasion into Syria. With thousands of US troops in Northern Iraq and thousands more converging around Syria it is obvious that Syria is being encircled for an invasion and final takeover. These acts take time to plan and execute. The chemical attack was just the catalyst to give them the final public validation for what they planned to do all along. When you weigh all the evidence available it reveals a conspiracy to turn against Assad and reverse policies to accommodate an invasion of Syria and the removal of Assad - so the original agenda of regime change could be accomplished.

Assad is not the dictator the west has portrayed him in the news media. The globalists have used propaganda against him so they can acquire that territory for several reasons, one being a greater buffer zone for Israel and to continue the war against Iran, and also to get an oil pipeline through from the Middle East to Europe. Assad is loved by his people and the so called protests were orchestrated against him in the same fashion it was done in Ukraine against that democratically elected government. None of us know the absolute truth in these events. The fist victim in war is the truth. We have to rely on a variety of sources to decipher what really goes on in these situations. Regardless of what truly happened we are powerless to change it. All we can do is hope for the best and that the truth will eventually be revealed.

George Eaton