Putting this reader's comments here, as they are relevant to the above post.

From reader M.:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Mr. Fusion;

I enjoy most of your posts on RMN, so thank you for that.
One thing though that I haven't heard mentioned at all, not anywhere: when Hannity 'met' with Assange at the embassy in London last week for the 'proof of life' style interview, how come nobody has mentioned that when the camera angle that showed Hannity from his left with Assange shown from his right side--with both of them shown on screen at the same time--how come it appeared that Assange was about 8 feet tall with a head that was nearly twice the size of Hannity's head ? I noticed it instantly...why hasn't this been brought up anywhere ? It's pretty easy to see this unbelievable screw up; when Assange was filmed in his cell or wherever he's really being held captive, it appears that a real amateur was in charge of the technical end, where Assange's visual image had to be transferred onto the screen to make it appear he was in the room with the Hannity actor. Maybe it wasn't even the real Assange; maybe it was a CGI that was cast into the space where the interview was being 'held'. Hannity was filmed walking on the sidewalk in front of the embassy when he allegedly arrived in person for the interview, yet how do we even know that's where he really was ? Also, did you notice the look that Hannity had on his face when he was filmed walking at the start of the interview ? It showed an incredibly smug quarter/half smile of the bird that ate the canary--as in, "wow, these idiots are going to believe this scam meeting--I think I'll buy another Bentley with chartreuse leather interior when the check clears from this scam interview"...I hate sounding like a paranoid nutjob, but, Mr. Fusion, that 'interview' was NOT what it appeared to be...Assange WAS NOT in the room with him...I've never heard Assange speak in that cadence before either...it was too staccato, too fast without his usual slow and meticulous pauses between words. There was also too many "uhhhs' and "ummms" in his speech...the voice timbre and pitch seemed a little off but not enough for the average person to notice, however, the speed of his delivery and the "uhhhh" every third or fourth word made it clear to me that the Assange presented to the world in the interview was not the organic one that has been in the embassy since 2010...anyone with even a slightly elevated perception level could tell and if that person shut their eyes and really focused on him while he spoke, it was evident that he was being held against his will somewhere other than the room Hannity was in and was just following the script that he was handed, the one with the answers to the previously decided upon questions that Hannity was paid to ask.
If this is too hard to believe, just watch the video where both of them are on screen and pause it--on full screen mode--right at that moment when the two of them are shown..
Look at what you see on screen, like John Lennon asked in song back in '65--"Tell me what you see"...

Please post this but don't put my name in there with it. I've been waiting for someone to say what I did above and have yet to see anyone mention the OBVIOUS.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~