link:
http://82.221.129.208/baasepagem5.html

His revised assessment of the "intel" report is at the end.

Jim Stone:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A huge number of great messages came in today but I have a huge headache and it is far more than normal messages. I will get to them tomorrow, but to summarize the gist of it:

1. The language gaffe in the CIA report may not have been a gaffe at all. Obviously they were talking about "influence on the Presidential election campaigns," However, if that influence was referred to as an "influence campaign" rather than an attempt to "influence the campaign" then it would not be a gaffe at all. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and stop laughing at them, but MY GOD, even without the gaffe the CIA report is absolutely pathetic.

I still think it was a gaffe and that they subcontracted it out because it says right in the text that the report is a "product".

2. I know there are serious issues with the Fort Lauderdale shooting that are getting censored. My gut says it was a brain washed patsy who arrived with blanks and media magic and crisis actors did the rest. But I don't feel like commenting on this beyond that right now. And it really may have been to cover up the DHS takeover of the election process, which with Trump in power I think will backfire badly.

3. Obviously Trump is in severe danger, and they fully intend to kill him if they can get away with it. But I also think it is practically assured that Trump is a big time alt media conspiracy fact seeker and he's not even a little bit stupid about anything, and I mean anything. He did what it took to get in, and basically misled politicians thus far, and once he's safely in charge a lot of people are going to be stunned that he really is "one of us". Obviously the elite know this, which is why he is definitely in danger, with MSM figureheads calling for his assassination, intelligence upper ranks calling for his assassination . . . . . He's a lot smarter about this than I thought he was and that is good.

On that note, Anonymous sent:

"I previously posted my strong concerns that Donald is in danger. It has since come to mind another possibility that I can only surmise, having no direct evidence. One of his first priorities was to make strong ties with the military through General "Mad Dog" Mattis. He is known to be reasonable, but is quite ruthless when provoked. He is also respected by troops who are loyal to him. Mattis is the ideal one to give Trump a life insurance policy based on threat of reprisal. That is most likely in play so that Donald's death will result in certain military actions against the Cabal and specific leaders taken out. Like an offer they can't refuse that has been privately delivered and in effect on his death or harm to him period. He dies, you die without conditions. That would cause the Cabal to even take measures to protect him."

4. A while ago I talked about how the homeless were being taken as practice detainees. And I really think this is going on, even now. With that as a preface, I am just going to post this mail:

Just a reminder, while we celebrate Trump's victory, the situation on the ground is still dire. The homeless problem here in Seattle is still getting worse by every single day. And they are still disappearing by the hundreds at a time. We are now seeing tent cities setup on the massive concrete barriers that divide I-5 in the downtown area. These islands are extremely dangerous to reach on foot, because you need to cross 5 lanes of downtown interstate. But people are desperate enough that they are now camping in places that require some serious footwork (and balls) to reach. This is probably because all the spaces in the city are getting filled too quickly, and so they can avoid being harrassed and inevitably disappeared by the cops.

Martial law is most definitely out of the question. It would be a logistical nightmare from hell. But mass riots are going to be inevitable if something is not done quickly. Unfortunately, 99.5% of the population is too brain-dead too even notice ANYTHING at all. Their lives consist of wake up at 5, work their slave labor job, go back to their moldy tinderbox (house), and drink/drug themselves into a stupor while watching the Seahawks game. They are obviously too mentally retarded to take part in any actual rebuilding effort (a "new deal" type project). Lots of them have fancy degrees saying they know how to build things, but they only understand how to build repeat whats in the textbook.

Look at the laughable Seattle tunnel project for a perfect example. The 2 TBM machines that dug the channel tunnel were designed and fabricated in Kent, WA. But somehow, it made sense for us to custom order the largest tunnel boring machine EVER, from Japan, and have it delivered to our specially fitted pier, where hundreds of valuable waterfront acres have been turned into a massive construction site. This option was chosen over a simple "cut-and-cover option which would have been finished years ago and would have had twice as many lanes, without tearing up massive chunks of the city for years on end.

Most of the real innovators in America are on the verge of, or in the process of "going galt". I myself walked out of my engineering job, because I was sick of being verbally abused every day while being paid barely enough to eat and drive to work. The average population here is beyond hopeless, and most likely will not survive without a major, naturally occurring, purge. Its not worth it, working your ass off everyday just to uphold an incompetent child-like population.

When I hear someone say "where did all these homeless people come from? It's so strange, I don't get it." It's very hard to resist the temptation to grab a baseball bat to knock these people out of their comas."

There is a lot more than this in the message box, and a lot more to report on but I have a headache. I will do it tomorrow.

CIA report
I have changed my report on the CIA Russian Influence report to give them the benefit of the doubt on the language gaffe I mentioned in the first report. But even without that, the report is enough of a joke. So all I am going to do is remove the language gaffe part of it.
The intelligence report referenced in the report below is HERE. The only things of substance in the report are from 2012 and then they are tenuous at best.

The report CLEARLY STATES that there was no assessment made on the impact of Russian influence on the 2016 election, even though it is advertised as such all through it! Here is a direct quote, that shows the gaffes. I'll get a capture up later, but for now the site is in combat mode so I cannot upload the capture. This is a text copy/paste from the report:

Scope and Sourcing

_________________________________________________________
Information available as of 29 December 2016 was used in the preparation of this product.

Scope

This report includes an analytic assessment drafted and coordinated among The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and The National Security Agency (NSA), which draws on intelligence information collected and disseminated by those three agencies. It covers the motivation and scope of Moscow's intentions regarding US elections and Moscow's use of cyber tools and media campaigns to influence US public opinion. The assessment focuses on activities aimed at the 2016 US presidential election and draws on our underst anding of previous Russian influence operations. When we use the term "we" it refers to an assessment by all three agencies.

* This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment. This document’s conclusions are identical to the highly classified assessment, but this document does not include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence on key elements of the influence campaign. Given the redactions, we made minor edits purely for readability and flow.

HERE'S THE KICKER FOLKS: DRUM ROLL -
We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.

OK, LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT: They said, in their own words, that they did not make an assessment of the impact the Russian activities had on the 2016 election. AND:

As Sputnik News pointed out in the next report - Old and outdated data used, this report was actually finished in 2012, dredged up and re-badged, decorated, and sold as something that was relevant for an entirely un related election in 2016.

So there you have it, the BEST nuke they have against Trump and it is a LOAD OF OUTDATED UNRELATED CRAP.

Good for a laugh. Banana republic all the way!
Intelligence report that proves Russia rigged the election was from 2012
Yep, they had their report allright, and it was finalized years before Trump even decided to be a politician. Remember, all the way back in 2012 when they cracked down on PressTV and got them removed from all broadcasts that could be picked up in the U.S.? THAT. It was part of the same, with nothing new since 2012.

This did happen in 2012. I remember when they put tons of pressure on RT and actually succeeded in wiping out PressTv. The web site is still there, but PressTV was effectively dead. The intelligence report they threw at Trump was simply that old report from 2012, which means that in the context of Trump's election it meant absolutely nothing and is completely irrelevant.

For the icing on the cake, it turns out that the television programs RT was running in 2012 that the intelligence report was so against were discontinued before the 2016 election cycle even began. This is why we were told "the intelligence is real" and "no you cannot see it", because yes, it was a real report but NO, it meant NOTHING this election cycle.
This is a quote from Sputnik News, and a few others are starting to pick up on this also.
"A highly-anticipated declassified US intelligence report, aimed to prove that Russia supported Donald Trump, has turned out to be a huge embarrassment. The annex that contained factual material that was thought to provide evidence of RT influencing the American public was compiled in December 2012, right after the reelection of Barack Obama.

The report focuses on television shows and interviews that took place four years before Trump was elected, and well before he was even a politician.

In Annex A of the report, intelligence agencies claim that "Kremlin's TV Seeks To Influence Politics, Fuel Discontent in US." Buried at the bottom of that page is a note stating, "This annex was originally published on 11 December 2012 by the Open Source Center, now the Open Source Enterprise."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~