It sums up nicely the world we were born into, where we are and potentially where we're going. Excellent quotes...also.
: Reader WJ: When people unfamiliar with the liberty movement
: stumble onto the undeniable fact of the “conspiracy” of
: globalism they tend to look for easy answers to understand
: what it is and why it exists. Most people today have been
: conditioned to perceive events from a misinterpreted
: standpoint of “Occam’s Razor” — they wrongly assume that
: the simplest explanation is probably the right one.
: In fact, this is not what Occam’s Razor states. Instead, to
: summarize, it states that the simplest explanation GIVEN
: THE EVIDENCE at hand is probably the right explanation.
: It has been well known and documented for decades that the
: push for globalism is a deliberate and focused effort on
: the part of a select “elite;” international financiers,
: central bankers, political leaders and the numerous members
: of exclusive think tanks. They often openly admit their
: goals for total globalization in their own publications,
: perhaps believing that the uneducated commoners would never
: read them anyway. Carroll Quigley, mentor to Bill Clinton
: and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is often
: quoted with open admissions to the general scheme: “The
: powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim,
: nothing less than to create a world system of financial
: control in private hands able to dominate the political
: system of each country and the economy of the world as a
: whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist
: fashion by the central banks of the world acting in
: concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent
: meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be
: the Bank for International Settlements in Basel,
: Switzerland; a private bank owned and controlled by the
: world’s central banks which were themselves private
: corporations. Each central bank… sought to dominate its
: government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to
: manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of
: economic activity in the country, and to influence
: cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in
: the business world.” - Carroll Quigley, Tragedy And Hope
: The people behind the effort to enforce globalism are tied
: together by a particular ideology, perhaps even a cult-like
: religion, in which they envision a world order as described
: in Plato’s Republic. They believe that they are “chosen”
: either by fate, destiny or genetics to rule as philosopher
: kings over the rest of us. They believe that they are the
: wisest and most capable that humanity has to offer, and
: that through evolutionary means, they can create chaos and
: order out of thin air and mold society at will.
: This mentality is evident in the systems that they build and
: exploit. For example, central banking in general is nothing
: more than a mechanism for driving nations into debt,
: currency devaluation, and ultimately, enslavement through
: widespread economic extortion. The end game for central
: banks is, I believe, the triggering of historic financial
: crisis, which can then be used by the elites as leverage to
: promote complete global centralization as the only viable
: solution.
: This process of destabilizing economies and societies is not
: directed by the heads of the various central banks.
: Instead, it is directed by even more central global
: institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the
: Bank for International Settlements, as outlined in
: revealing mainstream articles like Ruling The World Of
: Money published by Harpers Magazine.
: We also find through the words of globalists that the campaign
: for a “new world order” is not meant to be voluntary.
: “… When the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a
: world social democracy, there may still be very great
: delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient
: and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate
: the new world order … and will die protesting against it.
: When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in
: mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents,
: many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” -
: HG Welles, Fabian Socialist and author of The New World
: Order
: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built
: from the bottom up rather than f rom the top down. It will
: look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use
: William James’ famous description of reality, but an end
: run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece,
: will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal
: assault.” - Richard Gardner, member of the Trilateral
: Commission, published in the April, 1974 issue of Foreign
: Affairs
: “The New World Order cannot happen without U.S. participation,
: as we are the single most significant component. Yes, there
: will be a New World Order, and it will force the United
: States to change its perceptions.” - Henry Kissinger, World
: Action Council, April 19, 1994
: I could quote globalists all day long, but I think you get the
: general idea. While some people see globalism as a “natural
: offshoot” of free markets or the inevitable outcome of
: economic progress, the reality is that the simplest
: explanation (given the evidence at hand) is that globalism
: is an outright war waged against the ideal of sovereign
: peoples and nations. It is a guerrilla war, or fourth
: generation warfare, waged by a small group of elites
: against the rest of us.
: A significant element of this war concerns the nature of
: borders. Borders of nations, states and even towns and
: villages, are not just lines on a map or invisible barriers
: in the dirt. This is what the elites and the mainstream
: media would like us to believe. Instead, borders when
: applied correctly represent principles; or at least, that
: is supposed to be their function.
: Human beings are natural community builders; we are constantly
: seeking out others of like-mind and like-purpose because we
: understand subconsciously that groups of individuals
: working together can (often but not always) accomplish
: more. That said, human beings also have a natural tendency
: to value individual freedom and the right to voluntary
: association. We do not like to be forced to associate with
: people or groups that do not hold similar values.
: Cultures erect borders because, frankly, people have the right
: to vet those who wish to join and participate in their
: endeavors. People also have a right to discriminate against
: anyone who does not share their core values; or, in other
: words, we have the right to refuse association with other
: groups and ideologies that are destructive to our own.
: Interestingly, globalists and their mouthpieces will argue
: that by refusing to associate with those who might
: undermine our values, it is WE who are violating THEIR
: rights. See how that works?
: Globalists exploit the word “isolationism” to shame
: sovereignty champions in the eyes of the public, but there
: is no shame in isolation when such principles as freedom of
: speech and expression or the right to self defense are on
: the line. There is also nothing wrong with isolating a
: prosperous economic model from unsuccessful economic
: models. Forcing a decentralized free market economy to
: adopt feudal administration through central banking and
: government will eventually destroy that model. Forcing a
: free market economy into fiscal interdependencey with
: socialist economies will also most likely undermine that
: culture. Just as importing millions of people with
: differing values to feed on a nation after it has had
: socialism thrust upon it is a recipe for collapse.
: The point is, some values and social structures are mutually
: exclusive; no matter how hard you try, certain cultures can
: never be homogenized with other cultures. You can only
: eliminate one culture to make room for the other in a
: border-less world. This is what globalists seek to achieve.
: It is the greater purpose behind open border policies and
: globalization - to annihilate ideological competition so
: that humanity thinks it has no other option but the elitist
: religion. The ultimate end game of globalists is not to
: control governments (governments are nothing more than a
: tool). Rather, their end game is to obtain total
: psychological influence and eventually consent from the
: masses.
: Variety and choice have to be removed from our environment in
: order for globalism to work, which is a nice way to say
: that many people will have to die and many principles will
: have to be erased from the public consciousness. The elites
: assert that their concept of a single world culture is the
: pinnacle principle of mankind, and that there is no longer
: any need for borders because no other principle is superior
: to theirs. As long as borders as a concept continue to
: exist there is always the chance of separate and different
: ideals rising to compete with the globalist philosophy.
: This is unacceptable to the elites.
: This has led not so subtle propaganda meme that cultures that
: value sovereignty over globalism are somehow seething
: cauldrons of potential evil. Today, with the rising tide of
: anti-globalist movements, the argument in the mainstream is
: that “populists” (conservatives) are of a lower and
: uneducated class and are a dangerous element set to topple
: the “peace and prosperity” afforded by globalist hands. In
: other words, we are treated like children scrawling with
: our finger paints across a finely crafted Mona Lisa. Once
: again, Carroll Quigley promotes (or predicts) this
: propaganda decades in advance when he discusses the need
: for “working within the system” for change instead of
: fighting against it: “For example, I’ve talked about the
: lower middle class as the backbone of fascism in the
: future. I think this may happen. The party members of the
: Nazi Party in Germany were consistently lower middle class.
: I think that the right-wing movements in this country are
: pretty generally in this group.” - Carroll Quigley, from
: Dissent: Do We Need It?
: The problem is that these people refuse to confront the fruits
: of globalization that can be observed so far. Globalists
: have had free reign over most of the world's governments
: for at least a century, if not longer. As a consequence of
: their influences, we have had two World Wars, the Great
: Depression, the Great Recession which is still ongoing, too
: many regional conflicts and genocides to count and the
: systematic oppression of free agent entrepreneurs,
: inventors and ideas to the point that we are now suffering
: from social and financial stagnation.
: The globalists have long been in power, yet, the existence of
: borders is blamed for the storm of crises we have endured
: for the past hundred years? Liberty champions are called
: “deplorable” populists and fascists while globalists dodge
: blame like slimy slithering eels?
: This is the best card the globalists have up their sleeve, and
: it is the reason why I continue to argue that they plan to
: allow conservative movements to gain a measure of political
: power in the next year, only to pull the plug on
: international fiscal life support and blame us for the
: resulting tragedy.
: There is no modicum of evidence to support the notion that
: globalization, interdependencey and centralization actually
: work. One need only examine the economic and immigration
: nightmare present in the EU to understand this. So, the
: globalists will now argue that the world is actually not
: centralized ENOUGH. That’s right; they will claim we need
: more globalization, not less, to solve the world’s
: ailments.
: In the meantime, principles of sovereignty have to be
: historically demonized — the concept of separate cultures
: built on separate beliefs has to be psychologically equated
: with evil by future generations. Otherwise, the globalists
: will never be able to successfully establish a global
: system without borders.
: Imagine, for a moment, an era not far away in which the
: principle of sovereignty is considered so abhorrent, so
: racist, so violent and poisonous that any individual would
: be shamed or even punished by the collective for
: entertaining the notion. Imagine a world in which
: sovereignty and conservatism are held up to the next
: generation as the new “original sins;” dangerous ideas that
: almost brought about the extinction of man.
: This mental prison is where globalists want to take us. We can
: break free, but this would require a complete reversal of
: the way in which we participate in society. Meaning, we
: need a rebellion of voluntary associations. A push for
: decentralization instead of globalization. Thousands upon
: thousands of voluntary groups focusing on localization,
: self reliance and true production. We must act to build a
: system that is based on redundancy instead of fragile
: interdependencey. We need to go back to an age of many
: borders, not less borders, until every individual is
: himself free to participate in whatever social group or
: endeavor he believes is best for him, as well as free to
: defend against people that seek to sabotage him; a
: voluntary tribal society devoid of forced associations.
: Of course, this effort would require unimaginable sacrifice
: and a fight that would probably last a generation. To
: suggest otherwise would be a lie. I can’t possibly convince
: anyone that a potential future based on a hypothetical
: model is worth that sacrifice. I have no idea whether it is
: or is not. I can only point out that the globalist
: dominated world we live in today is clearly doomed. We can
: argue about what comes next after we have removed our heads
: from the guillotine.