This be an edited post of the 2013 post that was in the 2014 Delete.
Within the political system comes the noticed and growing in strength, of a system of government (or business) that has many complicated rules and ways of doing things, that be populated of leaders that be of a conscientious, and a generally business-like manner. They have become well and good at to develop the ways to gain control of an authorization to act, and to bring together into one place something for which one is able to choose between right and wrong. They will become most important in their own way of being in accordance with what is just, good, or proper. They will appear as suitable, appropriate, acting in accordance with truth or fact.
These 'most important' within a system of government will become independent of the voters, and from those that exercise the restraining influence over them, thus making themselves becoming like of a control section, so as to change the attitude of thinking of the voters, and making it hard to remove these 'most important' of the system of government that has many complicated rules.
They become like a person who belongs to a small group of people who govern or control a country, or business, that also be made up from unelected successful and powerful economic, television, radio, newspapers, and internet people. The eyes of the voters do not see the successful and powerful people that be secreted around and within the political system. It may be within any administrative and functional structure like any voluntary association of individuals working together towards a goal which will be of benefit to everyone, or any enduring and cooperating social group, and institutions, having of the common traditions, collective activities and interests.
The longer that this small group of people who govern or control a country, or business, be working within the conscientious, and generally business-like manner in its ways to gain control of an authorization to act, and for which is able to choose between right and wrong, the more secure become their position. This position of this small group of people become like a fortress, incapable of being taken by 'assault', and it will become hard to remove them.
The voters may never know, or still even to understand, the questionable series of actions that lead to a particular result of this power, or even still, the series of actions of the true nature of this power.
Within this country, within the minds of the voters, it will always be, “we live in the democracy”.
Aye, in the 'minds' of the voters, we live in the democracy, promoting the 'rule of the majority'. But, really, are not the voters being colonialized by the democratization? Or, maybe the voters be democratized by the colonialization?
The colonializing of the voters' mind, to feel the pressure to do something in the promotion of democracy, would it be that this brings it to be a nobody's mind, that really knows nothing? Of the fearsome warriors of the past “that never ceased to harass and fight fiercely the Romans”, thereby declaring “themselves free and equal”, conquering with the 'weapon' was not an easy thing.
Would it be that the Romans soon learned it be easier to colonialize the 'minds' to feel pressure to do something, to make a body different or special of a character structure safe and secure from the others, rather than to democratize the 'minds' to feel pressure to do something , to make this same structure different or special? To be colonialized, or to be democratized?
The democracy of this small group of people who govern or control a country, where the minds of the voters, and even most of the civil servants, are colonialized to obedience? To make them be like of the second class of the democracy of this small group of people who govern or control a country
So, a democratized voter accessible to a small group of people who govern or control a country, who may go perpendicular in the belief of a colonialized mind, would be comfortable in the knowing that being “on the far side of the moat” , their be no way that they would have the capacity to change or affect an organized group of people with a common purpose or function, that be of a different structure in that position of power, that be in a safe and secure place from the democratized voter.
That the democratized voter be changed in the functionality of the mind by the altering of the logic, when encountering certain words and gestures from an organized group of people with a common purpose, making the democratized voter feel happy, even though the words and gestures have zero substance, while controlling the sane voice in the head, while the reasoning powers of thought make it to be that what is perceived, is in a way different from the way it is in reality, so as to make for the colonialized mind.
Like the supposed Jedi mind-trick, where someone will stimulate with tone of voice, and with a distinguished gesture, the mind of someone, to gain the appropriate response. Some will see through the illusion, and most, exhausted with the trials of their daily lives, will welcome this space of time with the rest and relief, which come to be the response desired.
.
Robert
Sarnia, Ontario
.
