From Wikipedia:
Suzanne Nahuela Jovin (January 26, 1977 – December 4, 1998) was a German-born American senior at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut when she was brutally stabbed to death off campus.
The City of New Haven and Yale University have offered a combined $ 150,000 for information that leads to the arrest and conviction of Jovin’s killer.
The crime remains unsolved. At Yale, Jovin -- Class of '99 -- volunteered as a tutor through the Yale Tutoring in Elementary Schools program, sang in both the Freshman Chorus and the Bach Society Orchestra, co-founded the German Club, and worked for three years in the Davenport residential college dining hall.
After dropping off the penultimate draft of her senior essay on the terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, at approximately 4:15pm on Friday December 4, 1998, Suzanne Jovin began preparations for a pizza-making party she had organized at the Trinity Lutheran Church on 292 Orange Street for the local chapter of Best Buddies, an international organization that brings together students and mentally disabled adults.
By 8:30 pm, after staying late to help clean up, she was driving another volunteer home in a borrowed university station wagon. At about 8:45 pm, she returned the car to the Yale-owned lot on the corner of Edgewood Avenue and Howe Street and proceeded to walk two blocks to her second floor apartment, at 258 Park Street, upstairs from a Yale police substation.
Sometime prior to 8:50, a few friends passed by Jovin's window and asked her if she wanted to join them at the movies. Jovin declined, stating that she planned to do school work that night. At 9:02, Jovin logged onto her Yale e-mail account and told a friend she was going to leave some GRE books for her in Jovin's apartment building's lobby, once she had retrieved them from an unnamed person who had borrowed them from her.
This unnamed person has never been identified.
It remains unknown whether Jovin did indeed meet this unnamed person that night. At 9:10, she logged off. It is uncertain if she made or received any calls.
Calls within Yale's telephone system were not traceable. She wore the same soft, low-cut hiking boots, jeans, and maroon fleece pullover she had worn at the pizza party.
Very shortly thereafter, Jovin headed out on foot to the Yale police communications center under the arch at Phelps Gate on Yale’s Old Campus, to return the keys to the car she had borrowed. Shortly before reaching her destination, at about 9:22, Jovin encountered classmate Peter Stein who was out for a walk.
Stein is quoted by the Yale Daily News as saying "She did not mention plans to go anywhere or do anything else afterward. She just said that she was very, very tired and that she was looking forward to getting a lot of sleep."
Stein also said Jovin was not wearing a backpack, was holding one or more sheets of white 8 ˝ x 11 inch paper in her right hand, that she was walking at a "normal" pace and did not look nervous or excited, and that their encounter lasted only two to three minutes. Based on the timeline, it is presumed Jovin returned the keys to the borrowed car at about 9:25.
She was reportedly last seen alive at between 9:25–9:30 pm walking northeast on College Street, but not yet past Elm Street, by another Yale student who was returning from a Yale hockey game. The two did not speak.
At 9:55, a passerby dialed 911 to report a woman bleeding at the corner of Edgehill Road and East Rock Road, 1.9 miles from the Yale campus where Jovin was last seen alive.
When police arrived at 9:58, they found Jovin fatally stabbed 17 times in the back of her head and neck and her throat slit. She was lying on her stomach, feet in the road, body on the grassy area between the road and the sidewalk. She was fully clothed and still wearing her watch and earrings, with a crumpled up dollar bill in her pocket; her wallet was later found to be still in her room.
Suzanne Jovin was officially pronounced dead at 10:26 at Yale New Haven Hospital.
Many items and observations have been reported by the police and media as possible evidence over the ... years of this investigation, much of which has either been discredited, deemed as hearsay or unreliable, or been explained. The most notable physical evidence appears to be: 1) DNA found in scrapings taken from under the fingernails of Jovin’s left hand; 2) Jovin’s fingerprints and an unknown person’s partial palm print found on a Fresca bottle in the bushes in front of where her body was found; and 3) the tip of the knife used in the attack that was lodged in her skull.
The most notable observations appear to be 1) "a tan or brown van stopped in the roadway facing east, immediately adjacent to where Suzanne was found.”, 2) "a man in his 20s or 30s with an athletic build, well-groomed hair, dark pants, a loose-fitting greenish jacket, running like his life depended on it in the opposite direction from where Suzanne Jovin was killed", and 3) "A mysterious, nondescript 'someone,' whom Jovin mentioned in an e-mail she sent less than an hour before she was found stabbed" to whom she had lent a friend's GRE test study materials.
The only speculation about the murder weapon came on the March 1, 2000 broadcast of ABC's 20/20 television program. According to host John Miller's voiceover: "The medical examiner would later identify only one of the 17 stab wounds as fatal. He would also determine that the murder weapon was a four to five inch nonserrated, carbon steel knife, when he discovered the tip of the blade lodged in the left side of her skull."[6] The New Haven police have never revealed whether any tests have ever been done to determine a precise make and model of the knife.
Though there have been no reports of anyone witnessing Jovin enter or exit any vehicle, it is generally assumed that Jovin had either forcibly or voluntarily entered one, as it was virtually impossible for her to have reached the intersection of Edgehill and East Rock Roads by foot in the short span of time that elapsed between when she was last seen alive and when she was found bleeding by witnesses nearly two miles away.
The existence of the tan/brown van was not made public by the New Haven Police Department (NHPD) until March 27, 2001. Although members of the Yale faculty had reported the police were asking privately about the van at the inception of the investigation, no explanation has ever been given why it took more than two years to release the information to the public. And although the New Haven Register reported on November 8, 2001, that the NHPD had impounded a brown van as part of the Jovin investigation, no link has ever been confirmed.
The existence of the Fresca bottle came to light on April 1, 2001, by Hartford Courant reporter Les Gura. The only store in the vicinity of campus that sold Fresca that was still open at the hour Jovin was last seen alive, was Krauszer's market on York Street near Elm Street. -– precisely one block south of Jovin’s apartment. Although Krauszer's maintained a video recording of its customers for security purposes, the police never asked to view their tape and have never reported seeking assistance from store employees or customers about whether they had seen anything unusual that night.
The foreign palm print has yet to be identified and public calls for DNA evidence to be extracted from it and other potential sources have gone unheeded.
The first mention of the existence of the fingernail DNA was on October 26, 2001, following a solicitation by the New Haven police for colleagues, friends and acquaintances of Jovin to come forward and give DNA samples voluntarily.
No explanation has ever been given as to why it took nearly three years for the fingernail scrapings to be tested for DNA. On September 14, 2009, Jovin's parents wrote to Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell that "potential forensic investigations, made possible by significant advances in technology in the intervening decade, are not being carried out due to shortcomings in the Connecticut Forensic Science Laboratory."
Rell's office admitted that the lab also had a backlog of 12,000 DNA samples that needed to be tested.
The DNA results from material collected under a fingernail of Jovin's left hand remained unmatched until November 2009. It was determined at that time that the DNA matched that of a trace evidence technician in the Connecticut State Police Forensics Laboratory, and was the result of accidental contamination at the lab.
At the end of June, 2008, the Jovin Task Force revealed that only days after the crime: "A female motorist told police at the time that she was driving in the area of Whitney Avenue and Huntington Street at about 10 pm when she saw a white male sprint past her and disappear into the church property."
As for why this testimony was withheld from the public for nearly a decade: "Sources said the police at the time showed her a photo of Yale Professor James Van de Velde —- Jovin's thesis adviser, whom police had publicly identified as a suspect —- to determine if he was the man she saw. They also took her in an unmarked van to Van de Velde's office so she could look at him in person.
She told them Van de Velde was not the man she saw running, and investigators didn't contact her again, sources said."
Subsequently, the Jovin Task Force began hanging a sketch of this person around the neighborhood in which he was spotted.
On July 16, 2008, the Jovin Task Force provided further details of Jovin's final email, written in German to a female friend, about GRE test study materials Jovin would leave for her ...
"Jovin wrote that she would retrieve the books and leave them in the foyer of her apartment for the classmate to pick up, giving her classmate the code to her apartment in case Jovin was not in the building.".
The materials were never returned, nor has anyone ever come forward as the borrower, leading many to speculate the borrower may have possibly been involved in her killing. Furthermore, Jovin's specific use of the word "someone" when referring to the borrower implies to many she did not know this borrower very well.
Four days after the murder, the name of Jovin’s thesis advisor, James Van de Velde, was leaked to the New Haven Register as the prime suspect in the case.
Fifteen months later, criminologist John Pleckaitis, then a sergeant at the New Haven Police Department, admitted to Hartford Courant reporter Les Gura: "From a physical evidence point of view, we had nothing to tie him to the case ... I had nothing to link him to the crime."
Famed criminologist Henry Lee’s offer to reconstruct the crime scene was accepted by the police but not carried out.
In 2000, Van de Velde and colleagues strongly and eventually publicly encouraged Yale to hire their own private investigators to study the case. In December, 2000, under additional pressure from the Jovin family, Yale relented and hired the team of Andrew Rosenzweig, former chief investigator with the New York district attorney's office, and Patrick Harnett, a former commanding officer of the New York Police Department's major crime squad. It was at their insistence that the NHPD allowed the state forensics lab to analyze Jovin’s fingernail scrapings for DNA. Neither the resulting DNA nor the Fresca bottle fingerprint were a match to Van de Velde, prompting Harnett to label Van de Velde “Richard Jewell with a Ph.D.,” a reference to an innocent man whose life was ruined by police publicity in 1996.
Yale has not made its investigation public, nor explained its secrecy.
The NHPD responded by contacting the US Navy, Van de Velde’s primary employer at the time, urging them to reconsider their contract work with him—going so far as to travel to Washington, DC to meet with Navy officials. A thorough review was conducted that resulted in Van de Velde being allowed to keep his job and his security clearance.
Sensing the investigation had dead-ended on him, Van de Velde undertook a letter writing campaign urging the Connecticut State cold case unit to take over the case.
When the Chief State’s Attorney refused, Van de Velde began pressing the police to undertake additional state-of-the-art forensic tests on the evidence.
On September 1, 2006, nearly eight years after the murder, the Jovin investigation was officially classified a cold case and moved to the Connecticut’s Cold Case Unit.
However, the case was never added to the Cold Case Unit web site nor was there any mention of the reward being offered, prompting Van de Velde once again to write letters of complaint.
On November 29, 2007, Assistant State’s Attorney James Clark admitted that the case had been secretly reassigned back to New Haven in June of that year, this time under the auspices of a handpicked team of four retired detectives. According to Clark: “no person is a suspect in the crime, and everyone is a suspect in the crime.”
On December 7, 2001, Van de Velde sued the NHPD in federal court in Connecticut claiming they violated his civil rights by naming only him publicly as a suspect while claiming that other suspects existed as well.
Van de Velde added Yale as a defendant on April 15, 2003.
U.S. District Judge Robert Chatigny dismissed the federal claims with prejudice and the state law claims without prejudice on March 15, 2004.
Van de Velde asked Chatigny to reconsider in May 2006, resulting in the judge reinstating both the state and federal claims on December 11, 2007.
On June 3, 2013, New Haven and Yale agreed to a monetary settlement with Van de Velde. State’s Attorney Michael Dearington admitted publicly for the first time that Van de Velde is no longer a suspect in the murder.
How did Jovin get to that fatal street corner in so little time [ walking the almost two miles, either on Whitney or uphill via Prospect, takes almost twenty-five minutes ]; and -- why was she there, at all, when the area is almost all fine residences and a very lush park ??
There is no shop there, no pay telephones, and nothing of obvious interest to a bright Yale student at any time of the day or night !! If she got a ride to that corner, who drove the vehicle and was it a van or a car ?? Such a ride might be offered by a friend -- but not accepted from a total stranger -- unless that stranger had either a code word for her or was wearing a uniform denoting him or her as an authority.
Initially, the fact that Jovin's senior thesis was on the subject of Osama bin Laden -- well known then to those who study foreign events, if not the public -- was discounted entirely by police ( and subsequent ) investigators. Yet these same august officials have nothing, nada, NO THING AT ALL, to offer as a motive for her murder. Or an explanation for the place.
The fact that Suzanne Jovin was 'over-stabbed' some seventeen times and the fact that bin Laden was then the 17th son of Mohammed bin Laden, road-builder to the Saudi Kingdom, seems to be something of an uncomfortable coincidence. As the above report indicates, only one blow killed Jovin -- which means the other sixteen wounds either had no meaning, or a less-than-obvious meaning. Was her attacker counting the blows ??
Or was it just a murderous and mad frenzy ???
