The mega-circus known as the Democrat National Convention has concluded in Philadelphia, but the concern of all of its major leadership will not be seen unless this next release indicates what most of America already knows:
The Clinton family is the most corrupt, un-indicted crime family in America next to White Bulger until the FBI finally went after his gang.
Hillary Clinton’s problem however is not as easy as a bimbo eruption or weak participant in one of their exercises of illegality which may spill the beans and thus must be taken care of; this problem relates to numerous fronts while she was Secretary of State and her friends she put into positions of power that guaranteed revenge will be taken not just against Hillary, but Obama as his term winds down.
An old saying relating to Russia, which I am paraphrasing in English, goes something like this:
“Don’t piss on the bear, unless you kill the bear.”
Hillary and Obama did not kill the bear and now the consequences of their ineptness and arrogance is about to come home to roost in spades.
Glenn Beck did a fine job outlining the personalities and individuals behind President Vladimir Putin within the FSB and oligarchy on his radio show yesterday. These are the same individuals who were probably behind ordering the Russian military and FSB to hack the DNC, Hillary, and in all probability State Department servers. Despite all the theories presented however, he could not tie a direct cause into why some of Donald Trump’s new and trusted advisers were tied to them and the timing of the releases beyond humiliation of the Clinton-Obama tryst which has run roughshod over world affairs for the past 7 1/2 years.
It is the purpose of this article to provide, cause, consequence and what shall probably be happening next if Russia stays true to character and elects to decimate both the United States and Europe before the U.S. Presidential election in November. To understand the reasons for this counterattack at this moment in history, one has to analyze the Clinton-Obama web of progressive and profit driven foreign affairs decisions and why Russia, along with quite a few other nations, feel the need to weaken and cripple American foreign policy for the foreseeable future.
The U.S. State Department Hedge Fund
The Hillary Clinton State Department was nothing more than a for profit operation, and the idealists brought in to the Obama regime’s circle of influence were either idealists who ran interference for these fund raising operations or militant progressives whose tactics would be of practical use for the Obama/Clinton State Department Hedge Fund. The first two individuals of interest have a history of interventionism not for American foreign policy benefit, but to push forward a globalist agenda of a world without borders and an international central government.
Hillary Clinton’s long term ties to Susan Rice made her the ideal choice in 2009 to become Ambassador to the United Nations and later, National Security Adviser. Her willingness to promote interventionist ideals and policies which benefit the benefactors to the Clinton’s in the 1990’s made her a logical choice for the Obama administration in 2009. Her role in actions during the 1990’s including destroying the sovereignty of several African nations in the name of “humanitarian” needs was someone false when her blind eye to the Rwandan genocide was exposed as she served on Bill Clinton’s National Security Council. Reportedly she even stated, “If we use the word ‘genocide’ and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November election?” Of course further injection of U.S. influence and foreign policy in Africa had a strange pattern of benefiting donors to the Clintons in resource rich nations like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sierra Leone, among others. This does not include her strange input and alleged influence in denying a request by the Sudanese government to extradite Osama Bin Laden to the United States in 1995.
Under the Obama regime, she promoted her interventionist policies once again, this time with the guidance of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ran cover for the Obama regime at the United Nations until 2013 when she became the National Security Adviser and thus all of her actions from that point forward and previous were protected conveniently by Executive Privilege. Her input thus has been classified as to what actions she took to cover up the Benghazi incident or input regarding the direct intervention of parties related to Clinton and Obama in the Euromaidan uprising in the Ukraine.
The other individual hired by the Obama regime was one very globalist, pro-Islamist, pro-Palestinian Samantha Powers. During her period on the National Security Council she also helped in an advisory role on the “Responsibility to Protect”, where a lot of the ideals behind the disastrous Libyan policies were developed and implemented but not for the humanitarian reasons projected by Ms. Rice and Ms. Powers. Glenn Beck did an excellent background piece on Ms. Powers which highlighted some rather disquieting ties which will bring this story full circle back to the Ukraine and Russia shortly.
With the background on those two individuals, it is time to introduce the criminal appointment and actor of the decade, at least from a political-economics point of view in this charade which triggered the ultimate beginning of the Russian response to Hillary Clinton and Obama’s corruption and attacks on Moscow.
Kiev, Oil, Gas, and Pipelines
Fast forward past all the global interventions: The Arab Spring and collapse of neutral and friendly governments which while they may have been dictatorships, they kept a lid on Islamist radicalism and terrorism within their nations; the purge of Eastern European governments with old school ties to the long defunct Soviet bloc; and the collapse of the economies in Eastern Europe and the Balkan States, the PIIGS, and MENA region.
The most damning appointment and intervention occurred in 2013 when the United States under the tutelage of the interventionists within the Obama administration and one George Soros was none other than Victoria Nuland. First she was strangely appointed as the State Department spokeswoman, even though she was imminently unqualified for the position. Much more disturbingly however was her next appointment as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs. Nuland’s knowledge of the Russian situation and the Ukraine was extensive, albeit from an anti-Putin agenda infused by her mysterious relationships with Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and other yet unidentified oligarchs within the current Ukrainian regime.
The Libyan intervention and George Soros relationship was best expressed with a chart of West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil (WTIC):
If anyone does not think Mr. Soros did not make a handsome profit on his Petrobras and commodity investments when Libya collapsed, then you are a fool. In the interim before the start of the Ukrainian insurrection, Mr. Soros penned a fascinating hint as to his next course of action in a November 26, 2013 editorial in the UK Guardian:
Europe needs a Roma working class
There are more than 10 million Roma living in Europe, mostly concentrated in the Balkans and in the European Union’s newest member states, especially Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, and Hungary. What is truly shocking is that their living conditions have actually deteriorated since many of them became EU citizens. At the same time, the majority population’s attitude has become more hostile almost everywhere in Europe.
The two trends are mutually reinforcing: marginalisation breeds contempt, and vice versa. The only escape from this trap is investment in education, which would pay enormous social dividends.
Consider, for example, that Roma represent more than 20% of new entrants into the labour force in the countries above.
What does this have to do with Russia, Victoria Nuland, the Ukraine, and billions of Euros in profit?
If Mr. Soros could use his influence within the Obama administration and post-Hillary State Department to seize control of the Ukraine, a scare could be sent throughout Europe forcing a diversion and removal of dependence on Russian supplied natural gas and petroleum products. That diversion was scheduled to occur with the Saudi-Qatari pipeline through Romania and the Balkans and would have created a huge boom in Eastern Europe.
Thus as the Euromaidan revolution began, the question has to be asked, was it genuine or financed by outside forces wishing to weaken and possibly bankrupt Russia and monopolize the territory and resources within the Ukraine; a hint, it was not genuine.
The Obama administration, Hillary Clinton leftovers, and George Soros actually believed the ...
lots more: http://johngaltfla.com/wordpress/2016/07/29/wikileaks-hillary-and-russia-revenge-is-a-dish-best-served-cold/