Wednesday, July 13, 2016
Q. Hi Lynn, may I suggest that you do a reading on the murder of British member of parliament and pro-EU-campaigner Jo Cox, who died Thursday this week.
http://psychicfocus.blogspot.hr/
Just before it happened she was heading for the library on Market Street, Birstall, West Yorkshire to attend to an advice surgery (a kind of meeting where people can ask their representatives questions). Just outside the library she supposedly saw two men arguing and tried to intervene. One of the men shot her three times, once was in the head, and then stabbed her repeatedly. Other witnesses have come forward saying they didn't hear a gunshot, so this may be false, though.
Labour PM Marla Eagle tweeted that she heard the assailant shouting "Britain First", a statement she later took back.
A 52 year old man named Thomas Mair with mental health issues was arrested by police. He is described as a loner, who has volunteered to tend to people's gardens. Media is trying to tie him to national socialism and right wing politics, e.g. the right wing party Britain First, by citing claims that "Britain First" was being shouted during the assault.
Jo Cox's birthday was right before the EU referendum (on whether to leave or stay in the EU). Many say it may trigger sympathy votes in favor of staying in EU, since this was her stance. If UK leaves the EU, it may ultimately lead to the collapse of the EU.
There are several interesting relationships concerning the date of her death, which has been pointed out:
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1062743878&postcount=182
Questions:
Is Thomas Mair really responsible for the attack?
Who did it and why?
Was Jo Cox's husband in on it, did he know beforehand?
A. I get that she was being stalked, and when the time was right her life was taken. If it would not have happened this way, I get it would have happened another. People in powerful places wanted the UK to leave the EU, and those people wanted to stop any opposing votes. I don't see it as someone on her side using her as a sacrifice, but rather an opposing force getting rid of obstacles or people outspoken with opposite views.
Thomas Mair feels like a patsy in all this. A mentally challenged person was manipulated to "think" they did it, when they really didn't. I see this man as highly influenced depending on his surroundings, and he provided a good scapegoat. This looks to have carried out by a rogue special military force (looks like an emblem of a coiled snake represents them) disguised as average citizens that followed this woman to various events to look for an opportunity.
I also do not see her husband as being involved. I see there being a lot of doubt against him, but I cannot see that he had anything to do with the planning and execution of this terrible crime.
Q. Could you do a reading on Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party in the UK? Jeremy is a Sanders type character, but because the PTB do not want him, his party is trying to oust him.
A. I do see this as being true. Everything he says is against what the PTW want. He raises questions and has some socialist ideals that prevent the PTW from manipulating the people which translates to money out of their pocket. Something about him feels like they cannot quiet him, but they can discredit him to the point that people won't listen (this has a very strategic feel to it like a lot of planning when into how to force him to lose momentum and support)..
Lynn, A such fundamental world event as Brexit deserves your reading! No doubt that somebody was behind it. Was it done by Russia (Putin) in respond to European sanctions against Russia? It seems less likely that it was prepared by US. What overall effect Brexit will have for Europe and the whole world politically and economically? Is this step to the light or back to the darkness?
A. Brexit it huge, and I see some unintended consequences happening as a result.
I get that the concern started to arise because the economy of Europe feels unstable. Employment feels very challenged right now. With the influx of refugees, I see that a destabilization is going to occur (if it hasn't already) and Europe in general will have to struggle with this issue. There are too many people and not enough jobs and resources to be comfortable. This then results in areas where crime will really escalate because they have no money and no where to go. On top of that I see inflation being a problem because they continue to print money with nothing there to back it.
Britain saw this emerging and wanted to disengage from it. Europe wanted to keep (Britain) them to help add stability, but Britain basically could see this unfolding and wanted out. I also see that Britain felt it had a duty to the monarchy to insulate them from the EU and protect their assets (they somehow felt tied prior to Brexit). I see that the monarchy was the real influence to get this accomplished. I also get there is tons of gold in Britain, making them vulnerable in the event of another financial crisis (sort of like a variation of Cypress) and wants nothing to do with it, and that was the real driving force of this division.
Now that Britain is out, they can work on making sure their economy is solid. I also see as other countries fail (because this is really a no-win situation for them), powerful countries will go in and basically buy them up. It is like a two-fold plan to cause a destabilization, and then go in to save the day, and in the end you end up owning them.
Now that Britain has made their exit, I see other countries/ states following suit too. The image that is really strong is Texas breaking away and claiming independence. Other places look to use Brexit as a precedence for future plans.
And that is all I have for this reading. Thank you. Love and light,
at 9:46 AM
---
IZAKOVIC
---
IZAKOVIC
