(Thanks, T. :)

Reader Tiger writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Reader: 'Well...., it works like this.'

But there ARE facts. It is not just a fact if a jury decides what is true and what is not...and convicts a person based on this...there is an ongoing propaganda that there is no truth because everyone has their own version of truth, therefore no one can be punished by a court because the truth is opinion. If there is no group version of truth this breaks down the rule of law and chaos ensues. The best facts are logical statements like this and conclusions from these.

EXAMPLE: Governments govern specific territories and their authority comes from force over their citizens or from the consent of the governed. The more informed consent from the governed, the lesser the government acts on its own elite interest and the more its actions serve the general citizenry. The more force used by the government, the more the governed must use force (such as demonstrations and uprisings) to represent and protect their interests.

EXAMPLE: Currency is a claim on wealth, not wealth itself. If there is twice as much currency it will be devalued by 50% unless the populace is deceived.

EXAMPLE: Citizenship, like anything else, has no value if it is freely given away. To the degree a citizen's wealth derives from citizenship (that is, being a citizen entitles one to a share of wealth), a citizen's wealth is diminished by the increase in the number of citizens.

***************************************************************************