For example, the article specifically says:

"Not only that, but certain groups within our government have been appointing judges—without the approval of the president. This is clearly a violation of the Constitution. Thankfully, the Supreme Court felt so too. Now many questionable judges are about to get their walking papers."

As far as the SES, there are supposed "experts" there on all facets of humanity including The economy as with the FED (and the SEC). These are groups with "interests" that are not elected people.

The SC is of course warranted in kicking their tails.

AND, yes indeed, the SES is one of the groups...

: But I suppose it would set a precedent against any
: non-presidential authority selecting judges on its own.