Thanks to Anna Von Reitz, there is more and more fraudulent practices and procedures of the hostile entities of the status quo revealed! Things that "we" knew but didn't know how they came into existence.
The comments below, are about words and terms that are used in her article titled; The Genesis of The fake Corporate “Personas”
Here are the words and terms used in the article.
“semantic deceit”
This is an indication by her that subjective language fraud is at work within the status quo legal justice system.
There are two kinds of language frauds.
1 - Subjective
2 - Objective
The entities of the status quo did, do and will use "subjective" language fraud, which is volition and semantic, (what you meant is not what I meant and not in the context what I meant).
Beside the devious subjective language fraud, practiced by the entities of the status quo legal justice system, the entire 100% legal status quo justice system structure is based and built on "objective" language fraud. Fraudulent grammar. More precisely the absence of "correct-sentence-structure and communication-parse-syntax". Commonly known, changing facts into fictions.
EVERYTHING, the status quo legal justice system has is complete 100% fraud! EVERYTHING, the entities of the status quo justice system gained were/are based on fraudulently conveyed language and racketeering.
One of their main central hub of racketeering is “Porto Rico”. Literally and on paper! The port of racketeering, since everything must come through a “port”. Hint, hint! You can't sue your own country from within your own country!
“unincorporated”
Any word that starts with a vowel means “no”! It is impossible to fulfill a negative condition!
“private”
Any word that starts with the preposition “pri” means “no”!
“property”
Any word that starts with the preposition “pro” means “no”!
“under”
Any word that starts with a vowel followed by two consonances means “no”! The word is also outside of what is stated. It is not “with” it or “in” it or “on” it. There is a lack of the “continuation of evidence” between what is stated and what follows after it, because what is stated is “under” what follows. Plainly, there is no “joiner” what is described!
“incurs”
Any word that starts with the preposition “in” means “no”!
“accrues”
Any word that starts with a vowel, followed by two consonances means “no”!
“NOT”
When upper/lower case words and terms are mixed, it breaks the continuity, the rule of “one and equal”. Can't mix apples with oranges! “JOHN DOE” is not the same as “John Doe” as this same principle is also stated in her article!
“State of Ohio”
“State” is a pronoun
“of” is an adverb
“Ohio” is a verb
Anybody can show us the verb “Ohio”?
It is nonexistent! It is nonexistent (legal fiction) in volition and nonexistent in grammar! Only “nouns” exist. Where is the “noun” the fact?
Adverbs, verbs, adjectives and pronouns are fictions!
“Hans Luke Jorgenson”
“Hans” is an adjective
“Luke” is an adjective
“Jorgenson” is a pronoun
Where is the “noun”? Where is the fact?
There is a lack of “continuation of evidence” between the living entity and the name that is written on the paper.
The entity is a vessel. The cargo of that vessel is the thought/volition of that living entity.
The paper itself is a vessel. The cargo of that paper are the words that are written on it. The cargoes of the words are their meanings, what they represent, which supposed to be nouns. Facts. When the living entity and the meanings of the words on the paper are modified to be adverbs, verbs, adjectives and pronouns where are the facts? Nonexistent!
The facts do exist but not on paper! Adverbs, verbs, adjectives and pronouns are not facts!
“No law or fact shall be tried in court!” Pretty obvious, isn't? Nobody can argue with facts. Not sane people anyway. When you bring a fact into a status quo fiction court, they can't deal with facts.
Example: Bill Clinton
The ONLY way to express a fact (noun) if it is in a prepositional phrase.
“America”
In parse syntax
“A” means no
“meri” means mercy
“ca” means sheep
“No mercy for the sheep”!
“UNITED STATES”
“UNITED” is an adjective and it is in past tense, which doesn't exist
“STATES” is a pronoun
Anybody can show us the adjective/pronoun term “UNITED STATES”? It is nonexistent! It is nonexistent (legal fiction) in volition and nonexistent in grammar!
“United States of America”
“United” is an adjective and past tense
“States” is an adjective
“of” is an adverb
“America” is a verb
Anybody can show us the adjective/adjective/adverb/verb term “United States of America”? It is nonexistent! It is nonexistent (legal fiction) in volition and nonexistent in grammar!
These are only a few words and terms to show you the depth of the language fraud that is practised on you, to your expense! There are literally hundreds of mistakes in that short document and millions in the status quo documents they use to convict you with if you end up in their snares.
Obviously, everything you read in this article is 100% fraud too! Language fraud. There are no “nouns” in it! Just to further show you how deceitful these entities of the status quo are, even the word “noun” that supposed to represent a fact, actually means “no”=no, “un”=no. Double whemmer. Talking about deceitful vermins, these status quo entities!
On the other hand, when you are unable and can't describe facts, you agreed to be a fiction, you agreed to be in fiction from cradle to grave, you deal with fiction in all of your life, you use fiction language in all of your life and you are totally immersed in fiction, you have no authority to even complain, let alone get equity!
Something that is nonexistent cannot be damaged or harmed! Something that is dead, cannot be damaged!
One day you wake up, don't like what is happening to you, and you present your standing, your volition in fiction to another fiction.
0x0=0
THERE IS NOTHING! How can a “nothing” be damaged or harmed?
Have you heard the story of Odysseus and the one eye cyclops? Briefly; at the beginning of their encounter Odysseus told the cyclops that his name was “Nobody”. After Odysseus blinded the cyclops, the cyclops was asking for help from his friends. When his friends asked him “who hurt you?” the cyclops replied; “Nobody”. So, his friends said to him, if nobody hurt you why are you yelling? Stop yelling that nobody hurt you! Sadly, this is a “picture” of most of the people!
When objective language fraud and negative language used in contracts, that contract means NOTHING!
The “Magna Carta” is NULL AND VOID!
The “CONSTITUTION” is NULL AND VOID!
The “CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS” is NULL AND VOID!
The “Treaty of Vienna” is NULL AND VOID!
The “Treaty of Paris” is NULL AND VOID!
The “Free Trade Agreement” is NULL AND VOID!
Every one of them! No exception! Fraud! Fraud! Fraud!
Each and every contract is based/built on language. Language is the foundation of every contract!
When the language itself is fraudulent, how can any contract written in that fraudulently conveyed language be true and honest?
Impossible! ALL contracts are pretenses. Frauds!
EVERYTHING and EVERYTHING the status quo legal justice system has is NULL AND VOID! NOTHING the status quo has, satisfies the “Correct-sentence-structure and communication-parse-syntax”!
Please note that I am NOT knocking Judge Anna but showing you that the fraud is much, much deeper than you thought. Perhaps she is careful not to choke you on the info she knows and give them to you bit by bit. I don't know. I know for sure that what you read here about language is strange and foreign to you. That is because the entities of the status quo don't want you to know about this language fraud they practice and want to keep harvesting you. You went through their propaganda (they call it school) matrix, so at least partially you were brainwashed. Whoever you are. Now it is up to you to undo the damage they caused you.
Just because you don't understand now what you've read here, keep it for later reference when you will understand it.
When you understand this short sentence, it will be an indication to you that you started to grasp the immensity of the language fraud. Right now you can't even comprehend it because of its size!
Here is the sentence!
“The the is for the the”