(Thanks, C. :)

NOTE to AC and LR: If you want to connect with Charles, use the 'Send E-mail' link to let me know that's your wish and I'll forward your message to Charles.

Reader Charles Miller writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Reader Charles: 'HOW DOES BERNIE TAKE THE ....

Dear Hobie,
Response to comments on the Bernies Oath publish.
Please feel free to connect me to readers AC and Lucus Rose if they are interested in further dialogue.

Thank you readers AC and Lucus Rose for your comments and engaging in good faith dialogue. This is how solutions are born.

I have read your comments. I found our positions come from diametrically opposed positions.
My position is that of a contract holder with full recognized standing at and in capacity of Grantor, Bailor, Beneficiary and Depositing Creditor to all government authorities or powers.
My contracts are fully ratified federal and international records of unimpeachable Provence.
Thus, I approach all interactions with systemites from the contract holders position speaking to my debtors to the contracts.

In reading your comments, my first impression was you all were speaking from a servants position.
Giving credibility to usurpers position is the life’s blood of the corrupt operations of our whole culture.
I care not how my servants provide me government services. The corporations you all identify all claim to serve the contracts I hold.
So, rather than focus on the servants operations and their problems I focus on my positions and place the public servants in their place.
Believe it or not we, the small work group we operate, is recognized as something Different.
The following true story explains some of what happens when we engage with our contract debtors.

One of our work group attended Trumps Phoenix rally last Wednesday. Had a ticket. He went with NO ID WHATSOEVER. He walked up to the special entrance for vips and presented himself. He asked if the appointment for the meeting with the President could be verified after introducing himself by name. Ended up being right up front with the hoi paloi! No meeting with Trump.
The interesting point is no one else in the building except Trumps closest confidants, all known public faces, were allowed to be in the building with out the collar and ID tag as a brand. Collar being the cord holding the ID, as the brand.
More to the point, Don was approached while in the line at the VIP pavilion. The security asked his name, checked his clip board on 2 or 3 pages. He then escorted Don into the building.
How was Don recognized while in line to be singled out?
Why was Don escorted to the VIP and senior press area with no identification other than stating his name to security?
Other than being very closely watched by the security people, Don was only approached once. He was asked what he was there for as the lack of collar and brand appeared to be recognized. His response was, “ I am here to observe”.

We have traveled all over the country for 7 years, dealt with countless public servants, rarely being asked for ID. When asked we provide the document Hobie was so kind to publish a few days ago and published other places. Identity Certificate of Citizenship.

We have never had the Identity document refused! This is true during traffic stops, entering federal buildings and getting on airplanes.

The story expose the supremely relevant points.
1. The original contracts between the People creating governments still control and are recognized.
2. The public servants recognize the contract rights when presented the opportunity to do so.
3. Only you can identify your self and your legal capacities. Failing to do so empowers a public servant to identify you as a subject to his powers. Collar and brand.
4. When an American identifies himself and presents a public record document verifying his identity, standing and capacity, he is recognized and provide service by public servants.

My questions to you all are:
1. Why would I not act under the original, still in force and effect contracts creating government powers?
2. Why would I ever not properly identify my self and run the risk of being misidentified by a public servant?
3. Why do public servants treat us different, as superiors to be served?
4. Why do I care how my public servants organize their operations if they serve me properly?
5. Are you aware the federal government will provide you with proof that you are the Depositing Creditor?
6. When public servants are confused as to how to clean their own house, do I have a duty to step in as the contact holder?

Please see the AO 91 Criminal Complaint piece Hobie so graciously published.

Thank you for your time and I hope to open a dialogue concerning real actions creating the possibilities for solutions to be in action.







***************************************************************************