(Thanks, C. :)

Reader Charles writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Reader Sovereign: to Charles Miller - 'Ref....

Thank you Hobie and RMN for facilitating open dialogue.

To Sovereign,

Thank you for your honorable response.

I do not deal in or address presumptions. I rely on principles, facts, law and procedures moved in boni fide contracts.

However, you are preaching to the choir.

I do in fact own the NAME and have for over 15 years. I have perfected title on public record in multiple jurisdictions. All of which are open public record.

I recognized over 20 years ago that the UCC deals in commerce. It is a limited jurisdiction.

I investigated who the actual owners of the commercial jurisdiction were.

I establish my legal relations with them in their own forum, under their own rules under their own procedures and in their own venues.

I also recognized over 20 years ago that there were multiple jurisdictions operating in my country.

The simple fact is the jurisdictions authorized to operate in my country are not limited nor controlled by the commercial jurisdiction. In fact, the commercial jurisdiction serves the original jurisdictions in our country.

I decided to find the fundamental jurisdiction or the house where this country began and work from there.

I called this country, The United States of America, a house in a very precise sense.

It occurred to me that the first jurisdictions would be the place to establish my standing at capacity.

I established my clear and precise illegal relationship with the governments attached to this land from day one. I perfected those documents on public record on open forum.

I properly served each of the interested parties. These parties are both local and international.

The service was perfected and there are no longer presumptions on either side.

There has never been an objection nor a rebuttal nor a protest to my positions. In fact it appears that the fundamental positions are not only recognized yet respected.

Perhaps you might find the term depositing creditor an interesting study.

The commercial jurisdiction in this country is a derivative of the original. It is also a subservient to the original jurisdiction.

I have never found any evidence whatsoever in the extensive records I have reviewed, both locally and internationally, indicating I am of any capacity whatsoever I did not decide on my own for myself.

What I did find is a series of compounding and accumulating presumptions based on a series of trespasses, usurpations and frauds.

What I did find is that private money, owned as private property by the Federal Reserve and private law administered by a private association operates exclusively on presumptions for which there is no evidence available anywhere. The records exist to show that these two operations function together as a master slave matrix. One is the protection for the other and vice a versa. One statement/question exposes this conclusively. If a federal judge, any judge, is paid in private money, who does he work for, the owner of the private money, or, the people that provided the house for him to administer his powers in? I think the answer is obvious.

What I did find is that all of those accepting these presumptions by the characters relying on them, and arguing or supporting the presumptions with actions define themselves as limited in capacity by their own actions.

What I also found is that attempting to escape from an overbearing system by using the very system that is trespassing upon one is an exercise in double minded actions.

Double minded individuals are very rarely listened to. What I found is the understanding of the difference between relief and remedy is the key element.

I have never been one to much to accept relief when remedy is actually available!

I have never been one to accept a foreign jurisdiction.

From all indications the positions established as outlined above have caused the auditors over very many systems trespassing on America to go into action. It appears as if the pressures are building beyond the point of containment.

The fundamental principles I work with are covered in a very few short statements.

All law is contract, all law is private between the parties to the contract, and all law deals with property and property rights.

Principles first, facts of record second, law third, and procedures going through the chain to the principals forth.

If I do not define myself someone else will because I don’t know who I am!

Servants interpretations of my contracts have no value to me unless I pay them for a service to advise me.

Reference to the laws exercising the jurisdictions controlling subjects as written by subjects to their owner are of no value to me.

I am not a subject.

I look forward to more dialogue.

***************************************************************************