There was no fuel anywhere (NOT EVEN IN THE FUEL LINES) because as it happened, the plane used up all the fuel. The “expert” explains. Notice that it is only a HYPOTHESIS!
They lie, lie, lie and lie more and more and more. Their lies never stop.
It is simply boggles the mind how any entity could constantly lie like these entities who are behind the “EMPIRE OF ENERGY”.
I bet these entities of the “EMPIRE OF ENERGY” knew, that eventually people will find out their scheme AND THEY MUST OF CREATED AT LEAST TWO PLAUSIBLE EXPLANATIONS WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO SAY TO THE PEOPLE.
In the link below, putting jet fuel instead of water into the fire truck, to maintain the ILLUSION there is jet fuel in crashed planes???
Naughty, naughty, naughty!
Did they just get caught?
Is that really jet fuel or water in the link below?
If that is jet fuel, it comes out from the a vent hole of the tank. When they supposedly fill up the planes with jet fuel, people should hear whistling from that vent hole as the air leaves the fuel tanks and gives room for jet fuel.
Can the pilot open and close those vent holes during flight?
As the fuel is used up, it creates vacuum in the fuel tanks.
Do the pilot open the vent holes to equalize the pressures?
If the vent holes open during flight at 500 Miles per hour, won't the fuel leak out of the vent holes?
Is there compressed air pumped into the tanks to eliminate vacuum as the fuel is used up?
When the sections of the wing fuel tanks are filling up, what happens when the fuel rises above those holes people can crawl through?
If there are no vents for each sections of the fuel tanks, there will be air pockets in each section.
At the 3:19 time mark of the video link below, it is stated that 4000 Litre of jet fuel can be transferred every minute into the plane.
The Airbus-A380 holds 325,000 litres of fuel.
To pump that much fuel into the Airbus-380 plane, it requires about 81 minutes.
It is also stated in the video link that a spark could ignite the jet fuel. According to demonstrations, can't ignite jet fuel even with a propane torch, unless it is atomized.
The Airbus-A380 fuel capacity is 85,472 US gallons.
In the video link below, look at the amount of space needed for 9,000 Gallons of fuel in the C-17.
According to specs, the Airbus-A380 carries almost TEN TIMES more than what you see in the link below.
Is it possible?
Can they stack almost ten times of that amount of fuel into the wings of the Airbus-A380 and some into the tail?
Look how secure it had to be. Even a little bit of sloshing of 40,000 gallons of fuel in the wings would cause severe attitude problems of the plane. The compensating pumps are simply not powerful enough to compensate a sudden slosh of lets say 40,000 gallons of fuel in the wings.
When 40,000 gallons of fuel in the wings slosh to one side in one or two seconds, will the compensating pumps move that much fuel in one or two seconds?
There are pros and cons in this matter but as long as we are faced with perpetual, chronic, psychopathic liars of the “EMPIRE OF ENERGY”, we never know the truth. Those who work (NOT the designers) in the airline fields are indoctrinated so bad, they don't have any “inquiring mind” left in them. They are unable to deviate from the status quo they learned from. These indoctrinated people are the most rigid with complete lack of imagination, creativity and possibilities. Perhaps they are androids.
Jet engines are truly engineering masterpieces but they are not the only ones.
The steam locomotive is another engineering marvel. Not too many people know but a steam engine can move a train for one mile on a cup of water. The efficiency of a steam engine is not the status quo tooted 17%.
Look at this beautiful steam locomotive in the link below.
From the founder of Judo (Jigoro Kano).
It (the quote) shows how TERRIBLY, CATASTROPHICALLY WRONG the status quo entities (in any status quo field) are when they FORCE people into their status quo “boxes”. There are some, who won't submit to them status quo entities, even though on the surface they appeared to be.
“In an argument, you may silence your opponent by pressing an advantage of strength or of wealth, or of education. But you do not really convince him. Though he is no longer saying anything, in his heart he still keeps to his opinion, the only way to make him change that opinion is to speak quietly and reasonably. When he understands that you are not trying to defeat him but only to find the truth, he will listen to you and perhaps accept what you tell him.”
Wonder if Putin follows the philosophy of Judo.
Wonder why Putin chose Judo and not the much more formidable “Systema Spetsnaz”.