(Thanks, T. :)

Reader Tiger writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Reader: 'For now I just step around it lik....

Regarding evidence concerning reports on RRN, I offer the following ideas:

1) It appears to be a basic characteristic of the Cabal that they have a philosophy of parasitism. They abhor work and they equally detest those who do work. This is why, for one, we may attach increased credibility to detailed reports, which take work to do. Also, it is a reason why those who are competent don't want to work for them.

2) Examples of cabal deceptions (beyond the probable exceptions of the Apollo landings) appear inept.

3) The cabal were unable to create a simple website to manage health insurance, probably because they assign responsibilities to relatives to address security concerns.

4) Those mentioned in the RRN reports, which are detailed with names and places, these persons don't initiate lawsuits against RRN. Some of these persons are highly-placed.

On balance, I have noted recently on RRN an appeal for funds. It seems rather ridiculous that the primary WH news outlet for communicating with patriots should not be funded by the WHs. When I pointed this out in a remark, Baxter or whoever he is banned me from remarking on the site.

So I do not know at this point how much of the "intel" we receive is true or fake, or how much of alternative news has been infiltrated. But I would say, the criteria for whether something is to be thrown in the Likely True pile or not is based on Holmes-like reasoning. And perhaps also, personal experimentation -- if one is openly critical and even suggesting reforms to get rid of the Cabal, and experiences no attacks (electronic or kinetic), it would seem the idea that they are weakened is reasonable. Even SGAnon is now open about his identity.

TIGER

***************************************************************************