(Thanks, C. :)

(I don't think Anna keeps an eye on posts at RMN.)

Reader Charles Miller writes:

***************************************************************************

Re: Anna Von Reitz: 'Additional Issues for The....

Once again we enter the world of NO BRAINER. Also know as stupid is as stupid does, of the Forrest Gump method.

PROGRAMING OTHERS MINDS is not the exclusive territory of the woke communist agenda of HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGERS, also known as the Deep State Swamp Creatures. The question is who these characters work for and what’s their goal?

The article requires the reader to ignore the common known definition of words in use for thousands of years in order to accept the premise presented.

“The word "real" means "royal". So, "real estate" means "royal estate". The phrase "real estate" shows us that the system of land ownership that we have unwittingly been participating in is foreign. Specifically, it's British.” QUOTE FROM THE ARTICLE.

Simple review of Merriam- Webster, a fairly credible source, exposes the perverted agenda of the author.

Definition of real (Entry 1 of 5)
1 a : having objective independent existence; b. not artificial, fraudulent, or illusory : GENUINE; B, (1) : occurring or existing in actuality
(2) : of or relating to practical or everyday concerns or activities
left school to live in the real world
(3) : behaving or presented in a way that feels true, honest, or familiar and without pretension or affectation
(4) : existing as a physical entity and having properties that deviate from an ideal, law,
d :COMPLETE, UTTER
e : FUNDAMENTAL, ESSENTIAL………

Definition of royal (Entry 1 of 2)
1 a : of kingly ancestry
b : of, relating to, or subject to the crown
c : being in the crown's service
2 a : suitable for royalty : MAGNIFICENT
b : requiring no exertion : EASY
3 a : of superior size, magnitude, or quality
b : established or chartered by the crown.

The author, Anna, appears to be treating her reader audience as either very stupid and incompetent to use a dictionary or other credible reference resource, or as programmable minions serving the new order of re-defining our language and whole culture for some as of yet fully disclosed purpose.

Real Americans are faced with the ultimate choice concerning their individual futures, and the futures of their children and survival of the country. What that means in very simple terms is know the facts and law and definitions of the words for your self before making up our own minds and deciding on actions necessary for our own better futures.

BY WHAT AUTHORITY is one of the most potent questions any American can speak from.

What’s the difference between one set of corrupters pushing one agenda that opposes the other set of corrupters pushing their own? NOTHING!

We Americans have a rock solid reference point from which to choose our future. The bed rock is our Constitutions and their Declarations of Rights at the State level and the supervision Bill of Rights at our national level.

Asking the BY WHAT AUTHORITY do you public servants operate out side the Peoples first laws declared by the Bill of Rights always exposes the lack of authority that results in management of human capital known as SLAVERY.

If the readers are too lazy to simply read the legislative sections of their States Constitution and the U.S. Constitution and prove to them selves the Legislative sections do-not identify the People as either subjects or or to government nor objects to be ruled by legislation, then put your mask back on and admit to your self that you are a subject in your own mind and your identity is formed by someone or something other than your self.

The concept here is CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED.

When the public servants and the author of the article fail to answer the BY WHAT AUTHORITY question they invite subjects to certify themselves by following their mandates and pontifications.

This response is intended to open a dialogue with Anna so that the People will have a reference point based in reality of principles, facts, law and procedures, the place to stand on the law of the People and chose for them selves.

Having tried to open this dialogue numerous times prior, I expect no response.
That in and of itself is a strong indicator. Of what?

***************************************************************************