Give Me Liberty or Give Me Order: Individualism VS Collectivism

https://www.bitchute.com/video/eZ7kLjuMDiA/

The collective should never dictate to the individual, just as any one individual, should never dictate to any other individual.

When one individual claims their rights, freedom, liberty, feelings, are being offended, and demands others bend their will to stop the offensiveness, that request should not offend any other individual's rights, freedom, liberty.

The collective is a creation of the individual. It comes second. Many individuals are required to make a collective.

Parents should not bow to the collective, when it comes to raising their children. That doesn't mean parents should abuse their children. And a child's naive perception should not be used by social engineer wannabes, to advance their agenda.

Ignorance oscillates from one extreme to the other, missing what lies in between. Social engineer wannabes will always jump on the extreme opposite view. Using those extremes to argue with, in order to destroy a culture. Slippery when wet, applies here. You, the individual must maintain your individual balance. Mind your head.

Every life form has its own individual body. Every life form is responsible for its own individual life navigating choices. Each life form is without a ruler. It is expressing the idea of anarchy. It is presently manifesting the idea of anarchy by the obvious fact that it has an individual body. Independence from the control by others is natural.

The idea of "safety in numbers" leads to group think, collectivism, domination, majority rule, mob rule, hive mind, government, war, taxation, master/slave mentality, & retardation.

The laws regarding overthrow of the government are easily used by those who desire to dominate the entire population, to prevent the tree of liberty from being nourished by the blood of patriots and tyrants, tyrants who have already taken control of the government. Again, slippery when wet. This might raise the question about the intent for the establishment of a federal government, when the articles of confederation were only supposed to be tweaked. Notice, it would just be easier to allow all points of view to be heard in the public square. Where bad ideas could be silenced by greater awareness seeing them as flawed, without any government required.

The morally questionable conflicts in society should not be left for government to decide. It should be up to the individual, and parents. Just because natural things are perceptually distorted for profit, cultural destruction, social engineering, doesn't mean we need government to step in and screw it up even more.

Children shouldn't be taught that the human body is something bad. In fact, if we didn't make such a big deal out of it, it wouldn't become a bid deal. It wouldn't become profitable to show naked women, or to make porn.

In fact, if most people got back to basics, as in, growing their own food, raising livestock, the body and sex would be seen without over stimulation. It would be seen in the light of its true purpose. There wouldn't be any withdraw symptoms, so to speak. We aren't born with clothes.

One can only profit off of what has been deprived. In the same way as the drug market profits sky rocket when they have to go underground, so do many other things.

If you restrict supply, demand soars.

If you seek out a government to fulfill your personal responsibility, your individual abilities will atrophy.

A population is only as strong as its individuals are, strong.

A strong individual immune system makes for a strong population immune system.