Take a look at this picture reader in the link below. It is claimed it was taken from 1.6 MILLION miles from Earth. WOW! What a great, clear, sharp image of an 8000 miles diameter Earth “disc”, from 1.6 MILLION miles away on a camera that is on a space craft. That is some optic quality on a simple space craft!
https://www.universetoday.com/41702/picture-of-earth-from-space/

As you can read in the link below, the Galileo spacecraft used an 800 X 800 Solid State Imager. There is a troubling statement in the paragraph of “Solid State Imager (SSI)”. “The images are then combined electronically on Earth to produce color images.” In other words, those images what they show to people, weren't taken by the Galileo spacecraft. In other words, THEY WERE “COOKED” UP ON EARTH!
https://dal.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/7823

Let's use trigonometry again, to see if the status quo claims match the truth.
Again reader, go to this site and you do the calculations yourself.
https://www.rapidtables.com/calc/math/trigonometry-calculator.html

The status quo claimed distance between the Earth “disc” and the Galileo spacecraft is 1.6 MILLION miles.
The radius of the Earth “disc” is ~4000 miles.
The resultant viewing angle of the Earth “disc” from the Galileo spacecraft 1.6 MILLION miles away is 0.1432392 degrees.

Do you honestly think (perhaps believe), you could see such a clear image of the Earth as publicized, with ANY kind of optics, coupled to an 800 X 800 CCD imager, with a viewing angle of MUCH less than one degree?
If you do, I have a bridge to sell ya.

The other image of the Earth (in the first link) was claimed to be taken from by a GOES satellite, which is on a claimed to be geostationary orbit.

Let's use trigonometry again, to see if the status quo claims match the truth.
Going to the trigonometry calculator. We know the claim of minimum geostationary orbit has to be 22,300 miles. Plugging the numbers in, we get 10.16913 degrees viewing angle of the Earth “disc” from a geostationary satellite. Again reader, look at the clear sharp image of the Earth “disc”. Much clearer then most of them UFO video recordings that were taken less than a mile away. It appears to be that superior optics are common on spacecrafts.

The television satellites are claimed to be on geostationary orbit too.
Have you seen the individual “footprints” of them TV satellites?
They are amazingly precise. They almost limit their transmission coverage to individual countries. AMAZING ACCURACY, and the accuracy is done by radio waves! Radio waves diverge, reflect, deflect and propagate indiscriminately. Especially from such claimed to be distance away. Add to this the claimed to be THOUSANDS of satellites PLUS the even more “space debris” they say circling around the Earth. Yet, none of these objects effect the transmission quality of the TV satellites.

Have you ever tried to align a pizza size satellite dish, which collects “high power” TV signals?
If you did, you know it wasn't exactly easy.
How about aligning C-band satellite dish?
Just a tiny movement on the dish and there is no TV signal picked up. Yet, those thousands of satellites and “space junk” that are between the Earth and them geostationary satellites, have no effect on them TV signals from the TV satellites. The same goes for them GPS satellites.

A little speculation on my part.
Is it possible that the Earth is not spinning, not moving, not wobbling, doesn't do jack but “sits” in one place and EVERYTHING (Sun, Moon, stars) that we see and were instructed by the status quo entities is “space” is INSIDE the Earth, not OUTSIDE?
Is it possible that above us, there is a sheet of ice and above it tremendous amount of water?
Is it possible that those so-called geostationary satellites are FASTENED TO THE ICE SHEET, so they appear to be on a “geostationary orbit”?
Is it possible that the ice sheet is melting, therefore getting weaker, because the Earth is getting warmer?
Is it possible that the chem-trails are needed to cool the ice sheet above and stop it from melting?
Is it possible that Cyrus Teed was correct in his book “Cellular cosmogony”, that the Earth is like a living cell?
If the Earth is one living cell, then it MUST BE part of a bigger, living body.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI6S3Aqs-ew&list=PL5F5573D5A9B84DA3