Federal Court Lawsuit to be Filed Against SB 277 Tomorrow Morning
By Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
http://bit.ly/2962NB9

[snip]

I have here, on my desk, a DRAFT copy of the lawsuit to be filed tomorrow, Friday, July 1st, 2016 against SB277 in California. I can’t show you a copy of the final version until the exact moment it is filed. I am sworn to secrecy...

But, There ARE some things I can tell you right now:

(1) My friend Diane Miller JD, sometime Author for the BolenReport, and the head of the Health Freedom Congress, is flying in from Minnesota tomorrow to attend, and speak at, the Santa Monica Rally organized by Wendy Silvers. She will speak on the details of the lawsuit. Go there to hear what she has to say.

(2) I can tell you the names of the attorneys involved and tell you what I know about them. You will be pleased.

(3) I can tell you the basic outline of the case – what the points are, and why the attorneys are going in THOSE SPECIFIC directions. Once again, you will be pleased.

(4) I can tell you WHY there was so much secrecy in the organization of the case – and why I agreed with that tactic.

(5) I can tell you where I think this is going.

Let’s begin…

The Attorneys: There are three named on the face page of the First Day copy of the lawsuit: Jim Turner, Betsy Lehrfeld, and Carl Lewis. Why these three? Yes, there are a lot more attorneys involved. There is a tactic, and strategy at play here. For instance Bob Moxley, of Wyoming, is playing a major role, but his name is not on the first day filing for the simple reason that the case needs his personal signatures – and he is not immediately available.

...

The Case Outline…

Remember that I am looking at the attorney’s Draft Copy which has notes all over it. It is NOT the final copy to be file with the Court Friday, July 1st, 2016 – but close.

(1) There are FOUR Plaintiffs. One non-profit organization, and three individuals.

(2) There are TEN Defendant groups – which include the State of California Department of Health, Department of Education, three Schools Districts, and one County Public Health Department (Santa Barbara), and their employees, some named individually, and others in a group.

(3) There are, in the Draft Copy I have, THREE Counts (Causes of Action) – Violation of Constitutional Rights, Violation of California Constitution, and Violations of Federal and State Laws That prohibit Certain Uses of Medical Information.

(4) There are FOURTEEN sub-categories listed under the Violation of Constitutional Rights Count.

(5) There are EIGHT sub-categories listed under the Violation of California Constitution Count.

(6) There are FIVE sub-categories listed under the of Federal and State Laws That prohibit Certain Uses of Medical Information Count.

(7) The Relief Requested has FOUR parts – a request to declare SB 277 unconstitutional, a request for injunction preventing activation of SB 277, an award of attorney fees, and other relief as the Court sees fit.

Some things you will find interesting…

(1) The arguments (sub-categories) in the Counts follow common-sense guidelines, as in:

(a)The individual Plaintiff’s children have a liberty interest in bodily integrity, and the right to be free of unconsented-to and potentially dangerous medical interventions.