(We want to thank www.surfingtheapocalypse.com
for bringing this extraordinary article to our attention)

NOTE: I am posting the text here, but you really should go to the site and see the pictures. They really bring the article into focus!
http://pages.scifi.com/megatronicsmedia2/files/TheWarForCydonia.htm

The War For Cydonia

By J. D. Weiss

While reading the latest post on the Enterprise site by MICHAEL BARA and RICHARD C. HOAGLAND , I recalled all of the many times I have listened to Mr. Hoagland, on the Art Bell Show and I seriously began to wonder: has he lost the will to fight. Or has he simply locked himself into a corner of which he has no way out. Because he made certain predictions very early on he has to prove them to be valid today or his work loses its innate significance. I do not question that Mars as a planet has far more to be discovered because I have information which is unlike any published before which I have kept quiet for more than seven years. In all that time I have been hoping Mr. Hoagland or someone working along that same path of truth would discover the bigger secret. Unfortunately this is not to be the case. Without supporting evidence I will be going out on a long limb if I decide to post what I know. Meanwhile, there are several issues deeply embedded around this Mars fiasco which Mr. Hoagland does not attempt to acknowledge and that is the Nibiruan connection here on Earth and more importantly on Mars itself.

I can understand how enticing it is to put forth the idea that man himself is from Mars. That an early human civilization was already out in the solar system long before the societies on earth had ever began is a swell ideal in itself. I can see the pride of man swelling up as he basks in the glory of knowing all those Gods are really nothing more then super-humans in disguise. Forget about all those Niburians, Sirius B reptilians, Orion's and such because it is only us mankind looking back from behind the fun-house mirror. How simple the truth really is when all those "other" explanations are swept off the floor with such a grand sweep of the hyper-dimensional hand. However, that is not what the records say. Here again we are smack-dab in the middle of an evil-smelling quick-sand as far as this society is concerned because, The Lords of Nibiru are still being played off as Sumerian myths. Or even more brazenly as figments of Zecharia Sitchins imagination. There are many areas of the historical record of early human civilization which will continue to be hotly contested and the Nibiru aspect will be among them. I wonder, what are the Nibiru/Twelfth Planet dissenters so afraid of? And why?

I have written on this subject many times and I keep updated copies of those works on my UFO hot page. Long before I ever heard of Art Bell or Mr. Hoagland I received a tape of alternative 3. A secret mars mission carried out by an american/russion alliance. That in itself one would think be front page news. But of course it was dismissed as an Aprils fools joke. Amazingly it is still considered bogus even though the actual footage has never been proven false. Full motion in color, russian/american flight commentary, the sound [inside] of the disk shaped craft…was quite unique but, what does it take to break through the walls of hardened dogma? That is public dogma because in may of 1962 some faction of the Houston Space agency was on Mars. Houston by the soundtrack had control of the entire mission….what the hell???

Nearly twelve years before I had completed a research project involving economic methods to prove modern theories in favor of Khufu building the pyramids were wrong. I had never heard of Mr. Sitchin or his works at that time. So as I became more aquainted with their respective ideas and theories I was all too happy to see that these issues were not going to be buried under a heap of official dogma and scientific sophistry. And it is important to note Mr. Hoagland has not embraced the Nibiru Twelfth Planet connection. But he is a former NASA spokesman. Which is not in itself proof of anything but his own professional aptitude and scientific ability. But here again the roles of good cop and bad cop do come to mind. And what better way to lead the public then to have a formal debate with just enough of the right kind of proper ideal division to keep the rest of the question from ever entering the picture. After all what are all of those Horus references to in the first place if not the Nibiruans themselves.

Mr. Hoagland has talked in great lengths about the secrecy of the NASA agenda. He has pointed out the exceptional importance they have placed on the ancient symbolism, geometric/star alignments and the exquisite timing of certain NASA rituals in regard to those ancient occults. But he has never openly stated why these things have any meaning period aside from hyper-dimensional physics. How about hyper-dimensional occult magic---the force itself. The prize isn't about pretending to have such knowledge it is the actual practice and use of that knowledge. The inner circle or is that pentagram of NASA which keeps the agenda going right on schedule is more then just an empty re-dramatization of that ancient use of occult-force. It is the search for that power or perhaps the articles of its possession. Knowing how to read the map is just the first step. Getting to the treasure is the next and claiming it for yourselves is the third. To know how to use that power and who will be using that power are the next big questions. But of course this is all for most an empty, foolish notion because all those Nibiruans are all dead and myths anyway….right?

The identification of who was who in the ancient Pantheons is another area of contention that borders on open warfare. Enki and his sons ruled the lands which included the Giza complex. How they built the three pyramids is open to debate but I have yet to see one single explanation from anyone--- critics included that does justice to the truth. As I like to point out the biggest stone structure in the world built by non-human hands standing out like a sore thumb for all the world to see and scientists and laymen alike sit in its ample shadow and deny, deny, deny it is the grand proof. Because if one does stand up and point out the obvious it is into the pseudo-pit of hell for you. My article, 'To Infinity I Place My Step' covers the reasons why Khufu wasn't a Grand Pyramid builder. The proof is in the economic multiplier effect and why men who have bragging rights don't need scientists to tell them what is truth. The connection here is the Mars base which the Nibiruans used as the communication hub between the Twelfth Planet and Earth. And that complex was apparently what the War over Cydonia was really about. My question is who on earth right now is fighting the war. And is it just to cover up the Nibiru connection or is it about future property rights. Yes, property rights. Follow the money and you will find the truth here on Earth and on Mars. Another important question is why The Enterprise Mission is reaching out for a straw dog of a picture and calling it real?

The infamous Face picture courtesy of Malin/NASA.

As an artist who has spent thousands of hours working with computer images I am quite familiar with how to make photos "look" real or conversely fake. And since this photo is the one being touted as the "real" and the best of the images of the "face" on Mars it deserves a closer look>

!. Look at all of the smoothed over regions-whitish in appearance--that is called smudging and it can be done with a smudge-tool or by de-speckling. Real photos of a true landscape do not have "naturally white" smudged areas. Also the entire background layer has too much smoothed detail for the level of scale. Large regions have the same un-natural texture as small regions. This layer detail in relation to the object size is so off the face looks like it is only inches across…remember this is supposed to be miles across. Are we to believe single grains of sand are the size of boulders which in turn are the size of four city blocks squared? Or is that smoothed over sand-like-concrete in the background? The ground surface does not look real. The shadows [noon?] are not consistent along all of the cracks.

!. There is no true sun-light in the Malin picture. For comparison is an image acquired from the surface>

Note the image contrast. Mars has a very rocky surface which in the original Viking images of the Cydonia region can be clearly seen.

Making a computer generated landscape photo look real means getting the light to look realistic as well the surface textures and it is one of the key areas in obtaining photo-realism. Note my landscape in comparison to the Malin image [using Terragen a popular software landscape rendering program] show a similar texture bottom-left-hand corner.

Notice the background layer-texture here is similar to that of the Malin photo. The Terragen texture is partly a result of fractal bit-overlay mapping.

Why was the Face picture not done in color? Also I think that the overhead perspective would have worked well in favor of NASA to refute the claim the face is artificial. That is the strange part of the deal. To prove that the face is just a hill/mesa required only one shot in color with enough clarity of background to affirm scale.

Also why are no scale measures ever given by NASA on the images themselves? One inch to a mile, fifty-feet, forty-yards?

Proving a mesa only looks like a face is so easy NASA could have wrote off all of us Mars "researchers" in one fell swoop. Do the whole business in real time on TV and make huge ratings in the process. NASA had nothing to worry about if it was just a hill with face like proportions. Only if it is in fact an artificial monument to another Race of Beings, who would be by definition Ancient Astronauts, then does NASA begin to sweat. That of course is the real contention here. Finding artificial structures on Mars means Nibiruans and friends are real and thousands of hard-nosed, scientific rats in mainstream science circles are exposed for what they have been doing all along--suppressing evidence and the purposeful destruction of anyone who challenges their authority. Confuse, deceive and lie has become the official method of dealing with subjects deemed too sensitive for honest, public disclosure. Brainwash entire generations of Americans and even when they see the evidence right before their very eyes they will not believe what they observe to be true. Those who are not duped are ridiculed, labeled and if needed I suspect murdered. I do not believe all the Nibiruans are a bunch of human loving good guys. Quite the opposite. Which is why I will ask, "are we unofficially at war with a Nibiruan faction over Cydonia? Or over Mars in general?

This image below was the result of a painstaking, recreation of the Mars face from the Original Viking image>

My intention was to see what kind of face was there if the damaged portion was in a sense recovered.

If the Mars monument was a two-sided affair of Lion and Nibiruan would Hoagland be just as adamant of its reality? How about a woman's face and a Lion?

I had no prior need for any particular type of facial image. If it turns out to be a Lion/human that’s fine by me. But given the number of Images that have been handed out by Malin and NASA then used to deride the researchers who don't buy their brand of bull-shit , I would be not surprised at all if the next picture was stranger yet. So long as NASA holds the only working camera in a private hand [how convenient for them both] we see only what is safe for general viewing. If anything is found of substance they can distance themselves with photo-effects, brush-outs and sophisticated computer images which are in all likelihood not true images of Mars at all.

Another look at the original Viking image>

My image faithfully re-created the right side of the face from the left side keeping the smooth curvature, white areas and facial features of the Viking original. That process was one of artistic experience using the cloning tools and various brushes in PhotoShop. The difficulty was the curvature and the ragged split which is not one-half of the features. Look closely and note the Face is hollow. The left-eye socket allows light to enter and it can be seen as the lighter area at the top of the shadow cone.The right eye socket/face is missing and there is a downward curving piece at the head/crown which gives a measure of depth. The forehead extends all the way around---there is no lion like side to the forehead. The outer beveled section reminded me of hair as I have seen in Summerian depictions of Hathor and Inanna. That is why I extended the hair all the way around. Not the crater holes along the hair/forehead line.

The shadow area is deep. The line break is crisp and is saw-toothed with a slight-curvature like a busted egg-shell [which I studied in trying to figure out the curvature problem] that one would expect from a massive Hollow Structure. Given the time NASA and Malin had to prepare for shots, getting a close approximation to the Viking seems more then plausible. One good shot and all of us Twelfth Planet heretics would have been silenced for good.

In many ways I feel for Hoagland among others who have struggled with mainstream sciences opposition to get a better image of the entire Cydonia region. Reputations are on the line in several key areas of research which is a lousy way to practice science or art. Forget about the ego understand the truth.