American Dissident Voices Broadcast of May 5, 2001

Feces, Fetuses, Etc.
By Dr. William Pierce

Hello!

Let me begin by responding to a few listeners who had trouble believing
the bizarre things I reported three weeks ago, when I wanted to
illustrate the fact that there are profound psychological differences
separating the various human races, and these differences have
evolutionary origins: which is to say that they are inborn, genetically
determined differences that were established over a long period of time

during the evolution of the various races in various parts of the world,
where there were differing evolutionary environments.

In particular, I illustrated the psychological differences between the
Chinese and Europeans, and between Jews and Aryans. In the case of the
Jews I used the often remarked Jewish tendency toward scatological
humor, which is a much greater tendency than appears in Aryans. I cited
as an example of this tendency a new MTV program, Dude, This Sucks.
I mentioned that in the filming of a recent episode of this program two
men -- the "Shower Rangers" -- who previously had been dosed with a
powerful laxative, came onto the stage dressed as Boy Scouts. On cue
they turned their backs to the audience, dropped their trousers, bent
over, and sprayed a group of unsuspecting teenaged girls on the stage
with feces.

The Jews who scripted the Shower Rangers' act apparently thought this
feces shower was hilariously funny. This is the sort of thing which Jews
usually consider funny. I pointed out that the Jew ultimately
responsible for the Shower Rangers is the owner of MTV, billionaire
media mogul Sumner Redstone , who also owns CBS and many other mass
media. He is one of the most influential Jews in the world, a Jew who,
whenever he visits the White House, always gets a big hug from whichever
shabbos goy is President at the moment. I also could have blamed the
feces-spraying incident on MTV's homosexual Jewish program manager,
Brian Graden, who, of course, takes his orders from Redstone.

Some listeners just couldn't believe that an ultra-rich,
ultra-influential Jew such as Redstone could be involved in such a
low-class act as the Shower Rangers: Howard Stern, maybe, but not Sumner
Redstone. One thing I didn't point out in my broadcast three weeks ago
is that the Jew Howard Stern also works for Sumner Redstone. Redstone
undoubtedly is a very sophisticated and very clever Jew, but the Shower
Rangers is indeed the sort of filth he regularly produces for the
consumption of Aryan teenagers, whether their parents are paying
attention or not. It is indeed the sort of filth he and his fellow Jews
who control our media, our advertising, and the conditioning of our
children think is very funny. Talk to a swimming pool maintenance man in
Hollywood or someone who is responsible for security at one of the New
York condos where these rich Jews live and play. You'll get an earful.

Whether Sumner Redstone and Brian Graden believed that the Shower
Rangers would be a bold new step toward conditioning Aryan teenagers to
laugh at the same things Jews laugh at or whether they naively believed
that Aryans and Jews already laugh at the same things, there can be no
real dispute about the fact that the Shower Rangers were part of an MTV
program and that they performed as I said. The performance I described
is the subject of a lawsuit filed against MTV in Los Angeles Superior
Court at the beginning of last month by two of the girls who were
sprayed.

The people who told me that Sumner Restone never would condone something
like the Shower Rangers, that he is too smart and sophisticated for
that, were confirmed in their belief by the fact that they couldn't find
any news of the spraying incident in Los Angeles newspapers. Are you
surprised that the media bosses cover for each other? But actually, Jews
do talk about these things with one another. If it's too much trouble
for you to get a copy of the court documents, then scan some of the
Hollywood "insider" newsletters, which are chock full of news reports on
things such as which media mogul's son was so drunk at his bar mitzvah
last Saturday that he barfed all over the Torah scroll, or which queer
ad-agency executive has just been diagnosed as having AIDS, or who is
rumored to have made an out-of-court settlement with a shikse starlet to
avoid a paternity suit. Several of the Hollywood newsletters carried all
the details of the Shower Ranger episode last month. Believe me; it
happened. And believe me, it is typical of the people who control
Hollywood and the television entertainment industry and the conditioning
of America's children -- and, incidentally, all three branches of our
government.

When I spoke about the psychological differences between Chinese and
Europeans, I focused on the eating habits of the Chinese. Specifically,
I mentioned their habit of eating aborted human fetuses and also
domestic dogs and cats and body parts from various wild animals,
including those belonging to endangered species, and I gave tiger penis
and rhinoceros horn as examples.

I also remarked that what the Chinese do to cats and dogs is much worse
than merely eating them. Some listeners questioned this statement. "What
could the Chinese do to cats and dogs that would be worse than eating
them?" I was asked. What's worse is the way the cats and dogs are
treated before and during being killed for eating -- and also before and
during being skinned for their fur. And I should warn you that I'm a bit
of an extremist on the subject of cruelty to animals. I abhor cruelty,
whether the perpetrator is Chinese or European. I abhor the practices of
White men who trap fur-bearing animals. I am horrified especially by the
killing of big cats to make fur coats or jackets for rich women, but I
am extremely hostile even to the breeding of mink and other small
mammals just so that they can be skinned to help the female lemmings who
can afford it be more fashionable. The fact that there are White people
who are cruel, callous, and indifferent to the suffering of animals and
who are unmoved by the killing of such beautiful and magnificent
creatures as the big cats, however, doesn't mean that we are just as bad
as the Chinese in this regard. There are substantial differences. In
general, there seems to be no feeling at all among the Chinese and other
Asians for the feelings of animals. There seems to be no understanding,
no comprehension, of the White man's sympathy for animals. To the
Chinese an animal is simply an object, which may or may not have any
economic value. If it does have economic value, then it should be used
in any way that is profitable.

In addition to this general inability to sympathize with animals, the
Chinese do have their peculiar culinary habits and their peculiar
notions about diet. The consequence is that cats and dogs intended to be
eaten or skinned are treated in an almost unbelievably inhumane manner.
The cats generally are strangled or drowned before being skinned, so as
not to damage the fur. Some dogs, who do not have a cat's ability to
inflict damage on their tormentors with their claws, are actually
skinned alive. And there is the Chinese gourmet's peculiar notion that
the more painful a death the animal suffers, the more tender and tasty
is the meat. So, to please the customer, a dog or cat will be selected
from a cage in a restaurant, then taken into the kitchen to have all its
bones broken before it is slaughtered. The customer, seated at his
table, can enjoy the screams of agony coming from the kitchen as he
awaits his meal.

There's a great deal of very unpleasant information on this sort of
thing available at the Web site of the Humane Society of the United
States. That's hsus.org. The Humane Society even has sent undercover
investigators with video cameras into China to record some of the
horrible things that are done to cats and dogs there.

The subject on which I received the most questions was my report on the
eating of human fetuses by Chinese, who believe the practice is healthy,
just as they regard powdered rhinoceros horn as an aphrodisiac and tiger
penis as a potency enhancer. Some people who wrote to me just didn't
believe that the Chinese could be so different from Europeans -- or at
least, they didn't want to believe it. Some of them accused me of being
untruthful. Others simply requested proof. Actually, there's a great
deal of evidence available on the subject, but the language difference,
along with the characteristic Chinese suspicion of outsiders, does pose
some difficulties in gathering it. For this reason I'll restrict my
evidence today to an English-language Chinese source, the Hong Kong
newspaper Eastern Express. All the quotes which follow are from a
lengthy article which appeared in the April 12, 1995, issue of the
Eastern Express. A reporter visited several hospitals in mainland China
seeking aborted fetuses for eating and found that they were readily
available. I quote from the Eastern Express:

"Reports that dead embryos were being used as dietary supplemnts started
to spread early last year with reports that some doctors in Shenzhen
hospitals were eating dead fetuses after carrying out abortions. The
doctors allegedly defended their actions by saying the embryos were good
for their skin and general health.

"A trend was set, and soon reports circulated that doctors in the city
were promoting fetuses as a human tonic. Hospital cleaning women were
seen fighting each other to take the treasured human remains home. Last
month reporters from EastWeek -- a sister publication of Eastern Express
-- went to Shenzhen to see if the rumors could be substantiated. On
March 7 a reporter entered the state-run Shenzhen Heath Center for Women
and Children feigning illness and asked a female doctor for a fetus. The
doctor said the department was out of stock but to come again.

"The next day the reporter returned at lunch time. The doctor eventually
emerged from the operating theatre holding a fist-size glass bottle
stuffed with thumb-size fetuses. She said, 'There are 10 fetuses here,
all aborted this morning. You can take them. We are a state hospital and
don't charge anything.' . . .

"The reporter learned that the going rate for a fetus was $10, but when
the merchandise was in short supply the price could go up to $20. But
these prices are pin money compared to those set by private clinics,
which are said to make a fortune selling fetuses. One chap on Bong Men
Lao Street charges $300 for one fetus. The person in charge of the
clinic is a man in his 60s. When he saw the ailing reporter he offered
to take an order for fetuses that had reached full term and that, it is
claimed, have the best healing properties. When a female doctor named
Yang . . . of Sin Hua clinic was asked whether fetuses were edible, she
said emphatically, 'Of course, they are. They are even better than
placentas. They can make your skin smoother, your body stronger, and are
good for kidneys. When I was in an army hospital in Jiangti province I
often brought fetuses home.' . . .

"A Mr. Cheng from Hong Kong claims he has been eating fetus soup for
more than six months. To begin, the man, in his 40s, would make the trip
to Shenzhen frequently for business and was introduced to fetuses by
friends. He says he met a number of professors and doctors in government
hospitals who helped him buy the fetuses. 'At first I felt
uncomfortable, but doctors said the substances in fetuses could help
cure my asthma. I started taking them, and gradually the asthma
disappeared,' Cheng said. . . .

"Zou Qin, 32, a woman from Hubei with the fine skin of someone several
years younger, attributes her well preserved looks to a diet of fetuses.
As a doctor at the Lun Hu Clinic, Zou has carried out abortions on
several hundred patients. She believes fetuses are highly nutritious and
claims to have eaten more than 100 in the past six months. She pulls out
a fetus specimen before a reporter and explains the selection criteria.
'People normally prefer fetuses of young women, and even better, the
first baby and a male. They are wasted if we don't eat them. The women
who receive abortions here don't want the fetuses. Also the fetuses are
already dead when we eat them. We don't carry out abortions just to eat
the fetuses. . . .'

"Dr. Warren Lee, president of the Hong Kong Nutrition Association, is
aware of the unsavory rumors. 'Eating fetuses is a kind of traditional
Chinese medicine and is deeply founded in Chinese folklore. . . . ,' he
says."

Well, there is much more in the April 12, 1995, article from the Eastern
Express, an English-language newspaper published in Hong Kong. If that's
not enough for you, try digging into Chinese folklore for yourself. As
the man said, eating fetuses has deep roots in Chinese tradition.

While I'm on the subject of racial differences, let me mention something
I didn't talk about three weeks ago. I spoke only about the differences
between Europeans and Chinese and between Aryans and Jews. I didn't
mention White-Black differences. They really are in a category by
themselves. I am sure that many people really believe that we're not
very different from the Chinese. And there also are many people who
believe that the only difference between Aryans and Jews is that Jews go
to church on Saturday instead of Sunday and are a little better at
making money than we are. Those are the people who just couldn't believe
what I told them about eating fetuses and about the connection between
Sumner Redstone and the Shower Rangers. But no one really needs to be
persuaded that there are major differences between Whites and Blacks.

Everyone understands that the Blacks are quite different from us: even
the whiny college girls who wring their hands and ask me, "Oh, why can't
you understand that we're really all the same, that there is only one
human race?" Despite their desperate need to be Politically Correct,
they understand that the Blacks are as different from us as night from
day. The egalitarians prove by their own behavior that they really don't
believe in equality.

I'll give you a current example of that. I'm sure that you remember our
recent talks about the race riot in Cincinnati last month. Last week I
pointed out that although it was only Blacks who were rioting, and that
the rioters targeted Whites, pulling White men and women from their cars
and beating them severely, the only person charged with a "hate crime"
in Cincinnati in connection with the riot was a White man, 20-year-old
Craig Carr, who became enraged by the rioters and threw a brick at a
Black. The Blacks rioted and attacked White men and women solely because
they were White, but no Black was charged with a "hate crime" on that
account. A White man fights back, and he is charged with a "hate crime."
This was a clear case of Blacks and Whites being held to quite different
standards of behavior.

An even more recent case was that of a Black professor at Northern
Kentucky University. And I should tell you right at the start that when
any Black is held up as a "professor" at a White university, my upper
lip develops an involuntary curl. I instinctively assume that what I am
confronted with is not a scholar who is at the academy on his merits,
but rather a beneficiary of Political Correctness who is better suited
to picking cotton than to teaching White students anything. That
certainly seems to be the case with Professor Clinton Hewan, a
coal-black native of Jamaica who is a tenured associate professor of
political science at Northern Kentucky University. The university is
just across the Ohio-Kentucky state line from Cincinnati, and so the
riot was a matter of considerable interest on the campus of the mostly
White university.

The riot, if you remember, was sparked by Blacks angry over a fatal
encounter between a Black street thug with a long arrest record and 14
outstanding arrest warrants, 19-year-old Timothy Thomas, and a White
policeman who was attempting to arrest him. The Black was ignoring
orders to stop and raise his hands, and when the White policemen saw him
reach for his waistband, he shot and killed the Black. Professor Clinton
Hewan, of course, cheered the Black rioters. He already was well known
on the campus as an agitator for Black causes and an outspoken critic of
so-called "White racism," a handy catch-all label for anything Blacks
find troublesome. In 1998, for example, when the university failed to
give him tenure, he hired a lawyer and loudly and repeatedly announced
that tenure was being denied to him because of the efforts of "White
racists" on the faculty. The university predictably caved in and granted
tenure to Clinton Hewan.

After the riot Professor Hewan called for the assassination of the White
policeman who had shot the Black thug, Timothy Thomas. He told the
campus newspaper, the Northerner, that Thomas's family should -- quote
-- "quietly stalk that S.O.B. and take him out. . . . The family should
go out and get that policeman." -- end quote --

Now, can you imagine the reaction on the Northern Kentucky University
campus and in the local media if a White professor had reacted to the
riot by telling the campus newspaper that the police should have put it
down the same way the Israelis customarily put down demonstrations by
Palestinians: namely, by identifying the Black leaders in the crowd and
having snipers "take them out." Or suppose that a White professor had
told the newspaper that when the Black agitator, Jesse Jackson, came to
Cincinnati to take advantage of the publicity, White vigilantes should
stalk him and "take him out." Tenure or no tenure, that White professor
would be out of a job in a hurry. But what do you think happened to
Professor Hewan?

Nothing, of course. The White president of the university, Dr. James
Votruba, announced that he found Professor Hewan's call for the
assassination of a White policeman "troubling," and that he intended to
"look further into the matter." Well, not too much further. After all,
three years ago Dr. Votruba had given the university's "Stongest
Influence Award" to Professor Hewan.

My point is that liberals, soccer moms, yuppies, newspaper reporters,
and university administrators, all of whom will swear on a stack of
Bibles that they absolutely and positively believe that Blacks and
Whites have the same intelligence, the same ability to solve problems
and to innovate, the same degree of self-discipline, the same morality,
and the same way of looking at the world, don't believe a word of it,
and the proof of that is in the sort of preferential treatment they
always give to someone such as Professor Hewan. They don't hold a Black
to the same standards to which they hold a White man, because they know
-- even though they won't admit it -- that the Black needs an advantage
in order to maintain the illusion of equality. They know that the Black
doesn't have the same intelligence, the same degree of self-discipline,
or the same way of looking at the world that a White man does, and so
they always try to compensate in some way for that shortcoming in order
to maintain the illusion of equality, of sameness, but in fact what they
do is make the differences even more manifest to the perceptive
observer.

Thanks for being with me again today.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADVlist.

To subscribe to ADVlist send an e-mail message to:
ADVlist-on@NatVan.com (The subject and body of the message don't
matter.)

For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com

To contact us, write to:

National Vanguard Books

Attention: ADVlist

P.O. Box 330

Hillsboro, WV 24946

(c) 2001 National Vanguard Books