Author: Joe Vialls
In a puzzling move, the Jewish organization B'nai B'rith has moved in on the
Port Arthur Conspiracy (sic), deliberately though subtly attempting to undermine
the author's investigation into the tragedy which took place in Tasmania during
April 1996.
In a report dated February 2001, which this Jewish political pressure group
managed to file in the archives of the Australian National Library, the emphasis is
slyly shifted away from the reality of Port Arthur published on this web site, to a
more extreme version in which misleading claims are made.
Links to the article and the Australian National Library are provided below, but
in essence B'nai B'rith seeks to place emphasis where no emphasis exists, and
put words into the mouth of the author which have not been spoken. This is a long
time habit of the mainstream media of course, but one hardly expects to see it
used by a political pressure group whose sole reason for being is allegedly
"Anti-Defamation".
Describing the author's work on page two of its February report, B'nai B'rith
claims "The Port Arthur Conspiracy contends that it was agents of the Federal
Government, not Martin Bryant, who carried out the killings of 32 people [the
correct total was 35] at Port Arthur, Tasmania, in 1996. The massacre was
allegedly orchestrated by the Federal Government to provide sufficient cause to
enact legislation outlawing firearms, to disarm Australians as part of the 'New
World Order' (NWO)".
As B'nai B'rith knows very well, this is misleading rubbish, and a blatant attempt
to throw the author's diligent work into the "extreme right wing" and "anti-semitic"
buckets that B'nai B'rith helped to invent in the first place.
Once maginalized in this way, the Australian public will then hopefully "see
sense", reject the serious investigation, and instead accept the insane government
myth that intellectually-impaired Martin Bryant killed the first 19 victims in the Broad
Arrow Cafe with single shots to the head, all fired from his right hip.
Nowhere has the author ever written or suggested that Federal Agents were
involved, for the simple reason that none were. Nor could the Federal Government
have orchestrated this obscene operation, because it lacked (and still lacks) the
highly specialised skills required to do so.
Later on page four of its report, under the juicy sub-heading "The Conspiracy
Amongst The Racist Right", B'nai B'rith claims that Brigadier General Ted Serong
believes in the conspiracy. As a matter of fact Serong has never mentioned the
word conspiracy, but is on the written record as saying that Martin Bryant would be
completely incapable of the combat performance required to conduct the mass
murder at Port Arthur.
In reality Brigadier Ted Serong DSO OBE is very well qualified to take this
stand when voicing his opinion. During the Vietnam era he was in complete
command of all Australian Special Forces, making him one of the world's leading
experts in these matters. Later Serong was invited to become Victoria's Chief
Commissioner of Police, though he never took up the offer.
Even now, many years after his retirement from active service, when Ted
Serong speaks, very senior officers serving in the Australian Defence Force listen
to his opinions with great respect.
Asking exactly why a Jewish pressure group like B'ai B'rith should get involved
at this late stage, is as puzzling as asking why the Tasmanian Government paid for
a prominent Port Arthur survivor to receive three weeks continual hypnosis from a
Jewish psychiatrist in Melbourne. Most probably there is no connection at all, but
nowadays that survivor is playing an increasingly important role in subtly deflecting
attention away from the serious investigation, into more muddled and speculative
areas, where growing public discontent might be more easily contained.
http://pandora.nla.gov.au/parchive/2001/adcspecialreport/PortArthur.pdf
As filed in PDF formay at Aust. Nat. Library
http://diaspora2001.homestead.com/adl1.html
Or in HTML format
The thing is, they've laid out Joe Vialls contentions, but havent
refuted any of them in any detail -- just listed what they termed
"racist, right wing publications" that the story has been in.
One of them was the "new age racist" publication 'NEXUS' --- I just cant get over the racist hate that drips from Duncans pen every time he posts & the mag itself, why its just FULL of racist
hate.
Where are these people coming from??????????
Ohhh, I see now..... If you remember that its like no business we
know.......& that some whirlwinds have gold linings,,,,Well then its easy, --- follow the money...
I'm a bit cynical today....
sangraal