Population Reduction in America

Depopulating the Masses While They Aren't Looking

Have you ever stopped to consider all the strange, odd, basically
unexplainable events, behavior etc. that take place all of the time?
You know what I mean - those things that, no matter how hard you think
about them, they just don't quite add up. Things such as: AIDS and
other odd diseases suddenly appearing out of thin air; pfiesteria, a
once harmless organism mutating in a matter of decades to become the
"cell from hell"; the Central Intelligence Agency misidentifying a

pharmaceutical plant in the Sudan for a weapons manufacturing facility;
the imprisoning of marijuana users for life because "drug use is
harmful"; the refusal to fund needle exchange programs that save lives
because doing so "sends the wrong message to kids"; the banning of
tryptophan, an essential amino acid, because it is "dangerous"; ending
the Gulf War without so much as capturing the Iraqi leader and then
refusing to lift economic sanctions - resulting in the death of half a
million civilians - so long as the Iraqi leader remains in power; cancer
death rates multiplying six-fold since 1900 despite billions spent on
research; the international ban on CFCs despite third-world dependence
on them, the Columbine high school massacre committed by two high school
students, etc. Don't these things strike anyone as just a bit odd?

What if a single hypothesis could explain these strange, seemingly
unrelated events and more? This document - for the sake of exploring
just such a hypothesis - depicts a hypothetical speech given before a
gathering of the ruling elite. The hypothesis represented by the speech
can be thought of as a sort of grand unification theory that attempts to
tie the above events, and many others, to a common, underlying elitist
agenda. It is mostly based on conclusions drawn from work thus-far
invested in my timeline; therefore, look there and in the many
referenced documents in order to find support for the hypothesis. I
strongly encourage readers to read these recommended books and other
sources that are listed in the timeline references or on my links page.
Keep in-mind that as this document represents a hypothesis, it will
undergo a continuous stream of modifications as I learn more and more.
Please check back for updates.

The Postman (http://timeline.domainvalet.com)

---

Introduction

Today, I'm going to address a topic that many of you are already
familiar with - that being population reduction. I'd like to bring
everyone up-to-speed on what exactly has transpired over the past
century with regards to our population programs and to some extent, what
is in-store for the future. Certainly, I won't go into any detail as we
have only a limited amount of time but I will attempt here to convey the
general ideas.

As members of the elite, we are all well aware of the lessons history
has taught us. One event in particular has left its indelible mark upon
us and that event was the French Revolution. From that event we learned
just how deadly the masses could be to the ruling class. Afterwards, it
was vowed that what took place then would never take place again.

What was called for was population reduction on a grand scale. In many
parts of the world, population reduction has been carried out by us in
the form of famines, plagues and even wars but these approaches are
generally feasible only so long as they can be carried out beyond the
purview of industrialized "democratic" societies. This consideration of
exposure has always been uppermost in our minds as we planned population
reduction programs. Even the character of a war - be it a civil war in
which we are disposing of people on both sides of a skirmish - or a
"police action" such as that which took place in Iraq or Kosovo -
determines the risks of exposure that are involved. In "police
actions", everything must be done to ensure that the policing force
never comes into direct contact with the "enemy" lest they be given a
lesson in the politics of depopulation as I am now in the midst of
giving here today.

As our ultimate goals required that population reduction take place
uniformly around the globe, it was necessary not only to devise a
population reduction strategy for third-world nations but for
industrialized nations as well. Whereas we could easily get away with
famine or a civil war in a country like Ethiopia, population reduction
in Europe or America has required a much different sort of strategy.
What was called for was a way for us to depopulate the masses in these
industrialized nations while they weren't aware of what was going on.
That way, we could operate at a leisurely pace without fear of exposure.
This would be achieved by significantly decreasing the birthrate of the
masses and by significantly increasing their mortality rate.

Reducing The Unborn

How exactly did we effect a decrease in the birthrate of the masses?
This has been accomplished through various means. First of all, we
provided funding for birth control clinics and we developed new birth
control measures. Much work in this area was pioneered by such notables
as Margaret Sanger and Clarence Gamble of Procter and Gamble fame.
Aside from the mainstream birth control approaches, we have
also heavily funded surgical sterilization. Much funding has gone into
abortion clinics and into maintaining the status quo regarding the
legality of abortions - the latter requiring much of our effort in
limiting advances made on the part of the pro-life movement which has
strengthened in recent years. Funding has also gone into the
development of iatrogenic procedures applied during abortions which
"accidentally" result in permanent sterilization. As all of these
approaches require action on an individual basis and are thus too time
intensive, much research has been funded in the development of programs
that provide a rise in infertility rates on a more global-wide basis.
The most promising programs to-date have been those designed to control
the diet and nutrition of the masses - many of which have been in-place
for decades. We'll talk more about those in a moment. In addition to
these approaches, the masses today don't have time to multiply - they're
too busy working to pay their tiny little mortgages on their tiny little
houses to have any time left over for new additions to their litters.
Likewise, their incomes are also limited by various means so
that they never quite feel at luxury to multiply. Anything we can do
has been done. So much for the unborn undesirables.

Reducing the Living

Now about those undesirables who are already living. Their removal from
our backyards entailed a bit more work. For starters, we made life
almost impossible for various uncared-for segments of the population by
promoting unhealthful practices wherever possible. We introduced new
genetically-engineered diseases such as AIDS that target certain
defenseless segments of the population and we then limited any social
programs that threatened to bring them relief. We've fought hard
against any attempts to improve the nation's healthcare system as any
such improvements have typically threatened to benefit the poor. We've
promoted pharmaceutical drugs with numerous unadvertised side-effects.
Such side effects often include interfering with a person's nutrition.
We've promoted the use of alcohol and "hard drugs" by the elimination of
safer alternatives such as cannabis. We've seized control of medical
research institutions through use of non-profit foundations in order to
maintain rather than eliminate diseases such as cancer and heart
disease. We've suppressed all alternative medicines and the history of
their use. We de-emphasized the significance of good nutrition in
disease prevention. We've ensured that new mothers are motivated to
feed their newborn infants bottled milk formulas which are depleted of
important essential nutrients - especially fats, which I will talk more
about in a moment. We've effectively removed many important vitamins
and other nutrients from staple foods, such as grains, by refining them
and then selling the extracted vitamins to health food stores at
wildly-inflated prices - effectively placing them beyond the reach of
those who need them most - the poor. Foods are often vitamin fortified,
but at ridiculously low levels and not with the vitamins that are most
desperately needed. We were actually behind the creation of the vitamin
Recommended Daily Allowances, or RDAs which have resulted in an overall
reduction in vitamin levels. Via this reduction in vitamin levels, an
overabundance of refined carbohydrates such as sugar, the hydrogenation
process, genetic-engineering, eradication of valuable oil seed crops
such as hemp not to mention the use of economics and much propaganda,
we've greatly reduced the effectiveness - if not the availability - of
good fats, also known as essential fatty acids. We've done everything
possible to insure that those who are health-conscious are unable to
distinguish these good fats from the bad ones thus causing them to
inadvertently eliminate the good fats from their diets. Note, for
example, that there is no portion of the USDA "food pyramid" devoted
just to good fats - consequently, the food pyramid has served as a
highly-effective means of encouraging people to minimize good fats in
their diets. Unfortunately, in recent years there has been a resurgence
in the use of supplements containing essential fatty acids by the more
informed segments of the population though market pricing is helping to
keep such supplements out of the hands of the poor once again. Since
the turn of the century, the consumption of foods containing these good
fats has plummeted while at the same time, the consumption of
hydrogenated oils has skyrocketed. As consumption of hydrogenated oils
greatly impairs the function of those good fats that are still available
to the body, both of these trends combined have resulted in the
population's overall diminished health. Thus far, the masses have not
connected the six-fold increase in cancer death rates - since the turn
of the century - to these trends. One significant reason for this is
because pollution - in it's many forms - is automatically assumed by
many to be the sole cause of cancer. Everyone is led to believe that
cancer results from the addition to the body of some foreign agent. Few
ever consider that it might just be the result of the absence of an
essential nutritional agent instead. Of course, pollution plays a part
in cancer formation, but not in the levels typically present in air,
water or foods. Most persons who acquire cancer have never come into
contact with significant levels of carcinogenic or cancer-causing
pollution. Usually, only those persons with suppressed immune systems -
a result of poor nutrition - ever develop cancer at all... Concealing
this is but one reason why we need pollution, or at least the appearance
thereof. It is one reason why we hype pollution. I'll address another
reason why pollution is necessary to our cause in just a moment ... In
addition, we've done various other things like promote the frying of
foods rather than baking - again, to increase consumption of
hydrogenated oils. We've reduced nutritional choices in the supermarket
based on a person's income so that the poor have little choice but to
purchase hydrogenated margarine and vegetable oils instead of the much
more healthful choices of butter and olive oil - an example of applied
economics. Refined carbohydrates such as sugar, corn syrup etc. -
which greatly interferes with the metabolizing of good fats - are
heavily promoted. Overall, as a result of our de-emphasizing and
reducing access to nutrition in this country, the healthcare industry
today is dependent on a host of ailments that would hardly exist
otherwise. This dependency of the healthcare industry on the aftermath
of our programs effectively allies them to our cause - whether they like
it or not. Literally hundreds of ailments are now being treated
symptomatically with drugs that not only don't treat the underlying
nutritional deficiency but whose side-effects in many cases are much
worse than the symptoms they were intended to treat! What a terrible
shame. ... And those are just the people who can afford
medical insurance!

I mentioned earlier the eradication of valuable oil seed crops such as
hemp. I should point out here the overwhelming significance of hemp in
regards to our goals. Though few people in the States realize it, hemp
seed is, in many ways, unmatched for its nutritional value. As it turns
out, hemp had been used historically as a food source by various
populations around the world for centuries and the plant had attained
quite a reputation for enabling populations to actually survive famines
- including, unfortunately, those caused by us. Our drug
crop eradication programs were developed specifically to meet this one
particular challenge. One such program that we have undertaken in
recent years is the development of fungal agents that can be sprayed on
hemp crops to not just destroy them but to keep such crops from being
planted in the same soil in the near future. Later, I'll mention yet
another important reason why hemp was considered a major threat to our
goals - involving the nation's fisheries.

The Sink Drain Model

Though we continue to simultaneously weaken all of the masses at once,
we most aggressively target those segments of the population that lie
outside of the mainstream. Why? Simply because they are weaker.
They've already been abandoned by the mainstream so there is no one who
will come forward to help them - even if their plight were to become
known by others. Fortunately, that rarely happens because we manage to
keep the classes pretty much separated. On rare occasions when the
classes do mix, their class and cultural differences are usually enough
to keep them from transferring highly critical information. That's one
reason why we need racism and crime - to keep society segregated into
small, weak, isolated pockets. Other, similar techniques are used to
further isolate targeted segments of the population. Church
congregations, for example, are often encouraged not to associate with
members of society outside their church and in addition, they are often
encouraged to read from only one book - the Bible. Many thanks to
Bishop Charles Henry Brent and others for helping us to create the
ecumenical movement.

In the end, the targeted segments are effectively isolated - cornered
like wild animals by hunters. This approach makes sense for numerous
reasons. We have to target someone - it may as well be those segments
of the population that cannot currently defend themselves. Secondly,
the weaker segments of the population are the ones that don't contribute
- many of them are no longer employed in our corporations and thus, they
no longer consume either. Most importantly, it takes time to reduce a
population's numbers and therefore, as the populations within the weaker
segments are reduced over time, some members of the stronger mainstream
will have been weakened enough to replace those who have been
"depopulated" in the weaker segments. This effectively makes the poorer
areas on a map like the drain at the bottom of a sink. Such areas are
where the poverty-stricken masses are consumed. A large part of what
makes this work is that those in the mainstream middle-class - who may
suspect in the back of their minds that something is going on - are
apathetic, partly because they are too involved in class struggles of
their own, not to mention other problems, but also because they simply
believe that they aren't the ones being targeted for depopulation.
Technically, they're correct in that they aren't currently being
targeted - but little do they realize that a mere shake of the financial
"tree" or a diagnosis of cancer in one-third of their families, for
example, is more than adequate to repopulate the targeted segments for
continued depopulation! In a kind of poetic justice, just as those of
the middle class aren't there to help the poor as they slide ever closer
to the drain, neither will anyone be there to help those of the middle
class when they themselves later become the poor. That, ladies and
gentlemen, is what economics is all about.

The War on Independence

All of our efforts mentioned thus-far would be extremely effective at
raising the mortality rate of the masses except for one nagging problem
- many members of the masses are not yet dependent on us for their food.
As one might suspect, most of these people live in rural areas. Though
they are often among the poorest of the masses, their subsistence on
foods that they grow themselves has made it difficult for us to target
them or others who are dependent on them. One thing our ancestors
learned a long time ago was that such populations could not be
significantly reduced so long as they remained this independent.
Something had to be done.

What we've done is to make sure that small-time independent farmers have
been economically devastated. In their place, we've encouraged the
market dominance by the larger, more easily controlled farming concerns.
Farming subsidies and assistance programs are designed with the ultimate
intent being to devastate farmers over the long term. We took control
of seed banks so that heirloom seeds, which have served independent
farmers for generations, are slowly being phased out of existence. In
their place we promote seeds which have been genetically modified to
reduce their nutritional value and ultimately, we hope to force farmers
away from the practice of saving seeds for the next year's planting
altogether. This will give us ultimate control of food crops.

To a large extent, this attack on personal independence has contributed
greatly to the movement of populations to the cities over the past
century. In more recent years we have begun shutting down hospitals and
other public services in rural areas, thereby making it more difficult
for populations to spread further into these depopulated areas. One
reason that this particular strategy has been successful is due to the
fact that the masses live in constant fear of cancer and other such
diseases which, as I mentioned earlier, we have done all that we can to
make common-place. Regardless of whether they are independent or not,
members of the masses are thus highly encouraged to stay put in the
cities for fear of living too far from medical centers. Real estate in
the countryside is often only available at an absolute premium making it
difficult for many people to live a rural lifestyle. In addition, much
land which would otherwise be well suited to supporting rural
communities has come under ownership of the Federal government by way of
various means thanks to the U.S. Forestry Service, the Environmental
Protection Agency and other such federal agencies under our thumb. Now
if we could only stop cities from expanding outward! Fortunately, our
urban forestry initiatives promise to eventually resolve this one
particular problem.

In addition to farming, we've focused much attention also on the
nation's fisheries. As 75% of the U.S. population lives along the
coastlines of either the ocean itself or of the Great Lakes, this was
seen early-on as a crucial step to attaining our goals. By effecting an
overall decrease in landings of edible species found along shorelines,
many independent fishermen have been forced to seek their livelihoods
elsewhere - usually in the cities, where, of course we maintain
effective control over food sources.

This overall decrease in landings of near-shore edible fish species has
thus far been achieved by various means, each of which falls into one of
two categories - either we have targeted a reduction in an edible
species directly or we've targeted a reduction somewhere in that
species' food chain. As an example of the former category, anadromous
fish species - those that must migrate to fresh water in order to spawn
- have been in-decline for decades as a result of the creation of dams
and other such obstructions that prevent them from swimming upstream and
thus spawning. Another example is our encouraging the formation of red
and brown tides that kill sea grass beds which are often used by food
fish - not to mention their prey - as nurseries. Finally, using similar
tactics, we have also destroyed significant shell beds that were relied
upon by local fishermen for their livelihood.

An example of the latter category involves a fish known as the menhaden
that is a common prey to many edible near-shore fish species. One way
in which we have targeted the menhaden at the expense of it's predators
has been by simply competing with it's predators by landing large
numbers of menhaden ourselves. This is accomplished by way of a fleet
of specialized menhaden fishing vessels that are today mostly owned and
operated by a company known as Omega Protein, their largest plant being
located at Reedville Virginia - the site of Haynie's original processing
operation. For those of you who aren't aware, Omega Protein is mostly
owned and operated by President George Bush's old company, Zapata
Offshore. Anyway, the menhaden is an oily, foul-smelling and bony fish
that isn't caught as an edible species per se, but rather for the
industrial uses of it's oil - one of which just so happens to be its use
as a nutritional supplement sold in health food stores! Remember my
mentioning essential fatty acids earlier? Although menhaden oil isn't
considered to be an ideal source of these essential fatty acids, we've
managed to market it to the point that it is headed for dominance of the
therapeutic fish oil business nonetheless. In addition, menhaden
products also dominate the supplying of animal feed businesses as well.
The reason this is significant is because the amount of healthful
essential fatty acids stored in an animal's tissues is dependent on the
amount found in their food source - as I eluded to earlier. By being
able to control the amount of essential fatty acids in the diets of
chickens and hogs for example, we control the amounts that humans are
able to get via their diets ... Get the picture? In addition to
supporting our menhaden reduction programs, all of this provides us with
additional leverage over the nutrition of the masses as well. This sort
of parallelism of goals is a commonly sought after attribute of many of
our programs. Now back to catching fish ... How effectively have we
been able to compete against the menhaden's predators? All indications
are that we have done quite well though it has required considerable
effort and expense on our part. To give you some idea, we've not only
made tremendous use of spotter aircraft in locating menhaden schools -
we've even gone so far as to employ satellite technology! All this
incredible effort and expense despite the fact that Omega Protein today
maintains a monopoly on menhaden fishing! Fortunately no one questions
how it is that a company that specializes in processing menhaden fish
can justify the expense of satellite reconnaissance nor has anyone ever
questioned by what means such an arrangement came about or why it is
that an energy company such as Zapata Offshore would become interested
in operating a fish meal processing company in the first place!
Certainly, we must be doing something right!

Now for a slight detour. Clearly, for us to compete against menhaden's
predators by landing extremely large quantities of menhaden, one thing
was required above all else - markets for menhaden products. We
certainly couldn't justify catching massive quantities of menhaden
without established markets, now could we? As mentioned earlier,
menhaden oil is used in human nutrition and various other industrial
uses such as the making of paints and dyes. The menhaden oil and fish
meal are both used in various animal feeds; poultry, swine and ruminant,
dog, cat and bird feeds and feeds for several aquaculture species.
Today, Omega Protein controls 80 percent of the market selling fish meal
for cattle and pigs alone. As another example of the parallelism, it
just so happens that many of these markets would have been greatly
threatened by the continuing availability of hemp. Prior to 1900, hemp
was already considered one of the world's principle animal feeds. Hemp
absolutely had to go...

Other ways in which we've attempted to keep menhaden populations
in-check includes our effecting a reduction in the menhaden's food chain
or otherwise interfering with the menhaden's life cycle. Fortunately no
one early on ever questioned the need of the national fisheries to
incorporate genetics research into their programs. As such, we took
full advantage of this opportunity - in many cases, funded by the
taxpayer - to help us to pursue a long-term decline in the nation's
near-shore fishery resources. Some of our approaches at reducing
menhaden populations - aside from our over fishing of them, that is -
have, in more recent years, resulted in numerous large fish kills along
coastal waters. Contrary to accepted dogma, these fish kills were
intentional - not freak accidents, the result of incompetence nor even
nature's doing as they have often been portrayed by the media. We
caused them - at least the major ones! As I've no doubt made clear by
now, this was done to limit the independence of small fishermen thus
forcing them - not to mention those who are dependent on them - into
dependence on our food supply channels. That however is only the
interim benefit derived from our doing this. What's important to keep
in mind here is that by maintaining populations of key species such as
menhaden and anchovy at minimal levels, we remain in constant
preparedness for executing that which one day will be the "new world"
order. Sorry, I couldn't help myself. Indeed, as a result
of all of our hard work, within just a few short months of our executing
our orders, near-shore marine ecosystems will - for the masses at least
- cease to exist as a potential cornucopia and soon thereafter, thanks
to other events beyond their control, the pests will be no more.

Now, back to our story... Obviously, these numerous large fish kills,
that we were the cause of, have to be explained somehow. To this end we
have simply employed pollution - our most beloved environmental
scapegoat. As always, our genuine environmentalist friends - not to be
confused with those of us who often just play the part ...
... continue to lend us a helping hand in concealing our covert
activities by promoting pollution as the culprit behind the destruction
resulting from such activities. Many thanks to our environmentalist
friends for their full involuntary cooperation. Realizing that our
resources are quite limited, we have over time come to rely more and
more on such assistance from the public sector where applicable. It's
all way too easy, isn't it?

Overall, a general decline in the nation's fisheries has resulted from
these and many other such activities. Fortunately, operatives in the
fisheries can merely fain incompetence and the masses can be easily
fooled once again. Little do they realize that the elite were
instrumental in the founding of the national fisheries service, not to
mention the entire conservation movement during the latter half of the
nineteenth century. The fools! To think that we gave them the Darwin
Awards so that they could laugh at those "beneath" them! Pardon
me - the irony is just a bit too much. I have to say that each of them
deserves their own copy of this year's award, all framed and official,
but of course that would cut into our profits!

Many thanks to the efforts of our people at the Smithsonian, most
notably, Spencer F. Baird who, in 1871 brought to the attention of
Congress the "desperate" condition of the nation's fisheries!
Through their dedicated efforts was born the conservation
movement, upon which we've had quite a tremendous ride. Let me just say
that the Bureau of Fisheries was created in response to the perceived
threat that marine resources - that is, the nation's fisheries - were in
drastic decline. In reality, the men who studied the problem had no way
of knowing whether the nation's fisheries as a whole, were in decline or
not, nor obviously did they care. All they did was to make it appear to
Congress that the nation's fisheries were in decline, resulting in
passage of the legislation that created the Bureau of Fisheries. In the
end, the nation's fisheries have indeed declined but not because they
were in need of our intervention but rather, because they received it.

Over the past century or so the industrialization of America has caused
a mass migration of populations into the cities. At this point it
should be fully evident as to why this is desirable. If only for our
own peace of mind, we need the ultimate capability to control the
masses. I should point out here that to very this day, most Americans
still believe that the root cause of the Civil War was the abolishment
of slavery for the sole sake of the slaves. Most everyone in this room
is well aware that this is a complete fabrication but for the sake of
those who aren't clear as to what the actual motivation was, let me just
say that whereas once, the United States was an agrarian nation of
independent farmers, today, it is no longer. Need I say more?

The Criminal Injustice System

Now, moving on ... The criminal justice system is obviously an integral
part of our population reduction strategy. By imprisoning those who
commit non-violent acts, we are able to increase their mortality rate
significantly in a number of ways. We encourage prison overcrowding
which leads to a high rate of deaths - both from infighting and from
diseases such as tuberculosis. As mentioned earlier, diet and nutrition
play an extremely important role in our population reduction strategy as
well. This is convenient because in prisons, as in the armed forces,
mental institutions etc., we are able to enforce dietary standards
according to our goals - mostly through economic means. By imprisoning
those who have committed drug-related acts, in addition to effecting an
increase in their mortality rate, we are also able to greatly affect the
mortality rate of remaining family members. This is so because it is
often the bread winner of the household that is incarcerated. This
results in great economic hardship for their spouse and children and it
often leads to imprisonment and health deterioration of other family
members later on. Another advantage of criminalizing non-violent
behavior such as drug use is that we are able to increase prison
capacity significantly without removing too many truly-dangerous
criminals from society thus enabling those criminals to aid us in
further reducing "outside" populations. Mandatory minimum sentencing
has helped a great deal to accomplish this. By now, it should be
apparent why we do all that we can to discourage drug treatment programs
- especially ambulatory drug treatment programs. Another very important
reason why we criminalize drug use is simply to stop the use of
cannabis. Cannabis or marijuana is unique in that it is one of the very
few drugs that we actually do want to stop the use of but because anyone
can easily grow it - even indoors - this has thus far been a tremendous
challenge. The other drugs can be used to further our goals. Marijuana
not only cannot be used to further our goals, as stated earlier, it's
use, and indeed, it's very existence is contrary to our goals!

Exposure Insurance

Need we worry that the masses will become wise to our little "game"?
Should we concern ourselves that they might somehow become enlightened
and that our hard-won advances will be laid-out to spoil? Sure we
should - what we have undertaken here is far beyond treason by any
stretch of the imagination and we should never forget that no matter
from what angle we view reality, one thing is absolutely clear - we of
the elite are far outnumbered by the masses ... and those in this
country unfortunately continue to be armed, albeit with popguns,
especially in the state of Texas.

Any enlightenment of the masses surely won't be as a result of their
education. Some of you may not realize just how long we've been playing
our little "game". It's roots can be traced back long before the
American and French Revolutions were fought but those events in addition
to others such as Thomas Malthus' writing of his famous essay on
population in 1798 provided a major impetus to our goals. With the help
of many of our "friends in high places" we managed to stake-out our
claims to power everywhere possible and major accomplishments really
began to take place with the advent of a very important tool in 1865.
No, not the Gatling Gun - rather, the emergence of the tax-exempt
charitable foundation, one of the earlier ones being the Peabody
Education Fund, formed by George Peabody, founder of the J.P. Morgan
banking firm. I know we likely have some Peabody descendents here whom
ought to feel rather proud ... Anyway, foundations such as
the Peabody Fund, and later in 1882, the Slater Fund, were initial
attempts to influence public education in the United States although
they were more directed at the black populations rather than the general
public. As many here already know, these two funds, along with the
Southern Education Board, were later incorporated into Rockefeller's
General Education Board in 1902. Of course Carnegie also played a vital
role as well. Many thanks to both the Carnegie and Rockefeller families
for their contributions in shaping public education!

Various such foundations have been utilized along the way to achieve
major goals - for instance, foundations are often used to fund medical
research or, more accurately stated, redirect medical research. In one
of our most prized sleight-of-hand tricks ever conceived, we learned
over time that there exists no better way to enact control over an
organization's steering wheel than to simply fund the organization and
that's exactly what we've done time and time again - and with great
success I might add. Not to further belittle members of the masses but
they somehow still believe that funding a good cause necessarily means
that it's the good cause that gets funded. I see you get my
point, now back to my original one which is that we've taken every
conceivable precaution that we could over time to help guarantee that we
not get caught red-handed, so to speak. Population reduction is a
rather serious business - one cannot set out to do what we have done
without immense care and planning. Of utmost concern early-on was that
control be taken of the education process so that ultimately, members of
the masses would be incapable of acquiring the tools needed to piece
together history in-particular. Only the most prestigious private
schools and universities would be allowed to teach their students to
think for themselves - all others would only be allowed to hand out the
officially accepted truth for purposes of rote memorization. A denial
here, an accidental fire destroying public records there, a whole lot of
propaganda and before long, history as it actually occurred was soon to
be replaced by what we like to refer to as history as we say it
occurred.

So, how was history so effectively rewritten? By organizing! The
American Historical Association for example, was founded in 1884 by
members from our group such as Andrew Dickson White and Moses Coit
Tyler. Historical associations and societies were created for no other
reason than to centralize control. Such control was easily exerted
over member organizations through the use of certification procedures
and the like. In most cases, such societies didn't already exist and
therefore no effort at all was necessary in taking control - an
association was simply created from scratch and control over it was
assumed from the very start. Being the first on the scene does have
it's advantages. It's important to understand that general history
wasn't all that we were interested in rewriting. To effectively
increase the mortality rate of the masses, we had to control pretty much
all aspects of health care and medical research as well and therefore it
became necessary also to rewrite medical history to some extent. The
same can be said for other particular kinds of history but I won't delve
into them at this time. I will say that for reasons that in some cases
will be obvious, this same approach taken to commandeer history was also
taken to do the same in regards to various disciplines and services such
as legal, psychology, agriculture, religion, education, medical, public
health to name but a few.

I don't have to tell you how effective and amazing the transformation
has been in helping to keep things under wraps. As a result of our
efforts at rewriting history, acceptance of anything other than the
version of history as we say it occurred is virtually impossible today
as we now have a monopoly on the truth. Whereas the truth used to be
the truth and nothing but the truth, today, the truth is what we say it
is because those who make up the masses have an innate need to belong
and an accompanying fear of being different. To each of them, truth is
no longer defined solely according to what is reality but also by what
is considered acceptable to their peers. Anyone attempting to paint
history as it actually occurred will pay dearly in peer acceptance.

We make use of other techniques as well to keep things under wraps. By
our promoting absurd theories in the media that have absolutely no basis
in fact at all, such as reptilian UFO theories and other such nonsense,
... the overall result is that all theories - including
those that are viable and actually based in fact - tend to be rejected
by society as well. In effect, we group the good, or valid theory in
this case, with the bad or invalid theory and society conveniently
disposes of both types for us, never quite realizing that they've just
thrown the baby out with the bath water! You'll recall that the
prohibition of marijuana was a classic example of the application of
this technique, although not so much to keep a lid on things but rather
to ultimately deny the masses access to hemp or, more specifically, to
hemp's highly-nutritious seeds. Clearly, the tools of psychology have
served us quite well.

That Dreadful New Media

Let's hope that the tools of psychology continue to serve us well
because, as many of you know, we are now in the midst of one of our
greatest challenges ever - controlling the flow of information on that
dreadful new media, the internet. As I just mentioned, one way we have
sought to address this challenge is by stigmatizing anyone who even so
much as whispers the word conspiracy in earshot of others. In addition,
we've promoted the view that information on the internet is unregulated
and therefore, not at all believable - which of course is true, but only
for some of the information, not all of it. We've promoted the internet
as unwholesome to children. We've even played our trump card -
terrorism - claiming that terrorists learn the tricks of their trade by
what they read on the internet - all to little effect thus far. To
effect real change unfortunately, we need to do more than merely change
mindsets - we must change laws. As maintaining the prohibition of
marijuana is so pivotal to attaining our ultimate goals, we hope to set
a precedent soon by passage of a bill in Congress that will make it a
felony for website owners to link to other websites that contain illicit
drug-related material - in particular, material that either endorses or
instructs in the manufacture of drugs - our intended target being
marijuana, of course. Our definition of drug-related will be
interpreted quite broadly - I assure you. A bill was considered that
would simply make it illegal to provide such material on one's website
but we concluded that the effect would not be the same as our making it
illegal also to merely link to such a site as the latter approach
accomplishes what the former cannot - it results in a level of
nervousness - ok, call it terror - that prevents a lot of website owners
from even considering such a link to a site that may, at some point in
the future, contain this sort of material ... My apologies - I hadn't
intended discussing the internet at all here so let's move on if we may
...

U.S. Politics - One-Party Short of a Democracy

Next, I'd like to talk about politics. I surely won't touch on much
here that most of you aren't already aware of but some points here ought
be made nonetheless. Politics continues to be an effectively-utilized
tool by us as the masses continue to believe that voting can actually
make a difference. Today, politics effectively serves no
other purpose than to give the perception that the masses maintain some
control. Any actual control had by the masses exists only at the state
and local levels and then only in rare instances. What we have here in
this country, at least at the federal level, is effectively a one-party
system. As we already have our goals mapped-out a decade in advance,
the entire façade of politics is really no more than a big chess game in
which we control both sides of the board and in the process of
maintaining the appearance that the masses have control, we have our
goals superimposed on those that are of interest to the public. Though
our moves have been planned well in-advance, like the weather service,
we sometimes don't know for sure where the "storm" will hit until it
actually does. No offense to our folks in the weather
service - they haven't yet made good on their promises with all their
new toys yet, but I'm sure that they will eventually.

Tying into the New World Order

What I've addressed thus far is population reduction and to a limited
degree, how it was brought about, but I've mostly only touched on
population reduction programs from the viewpoint of a western
industrialized country such as the United States. As most of you know,
similar measures are being carried-out world wide, as they need be in
order for our ultimate goals to be achieved. These measures, to a
large extent, have only been made possible as a result of the initial
formation of what is known - even by members of the masses - as the New
World Order, the phrase popularized by ex-President, George Bush.
What exactly is this New World Order? What did President
Bush mean by this phrase? To keep within our agenda, I will adopt a
somewhat simplistic definition of what is meant by New World Order. The
New World Order could best be described as simply being the collusion
between the world's governing elite against the masses - period. Why is
this called a New World Order? It is called this because such collusion
in-effect means the dissolution of national boundaries and their
replacement by logical boundaries of power that effectively separate we,
the elite, from them, the masses.

In reality, sovereign nation states are defined by their national
borders - everyone within the boundaries of a state sharing common goals
and ideologies and I might add, loyalty to the state. Traditionally,
such nation states have gone to war either over territorial disputes or
when their nationalistic goals or ideologies clashed. Ultimately, under
an openly-established New World Order, wars will be fought only for the
control and containment of the masses. Until the transformation into
this New World Order is complete, existing national boundaries - though
meaningless in terms of sovereignty in many cases - will continue to
exist on maps, in textbooks and historical accounts only to help
maintain the illusion for the masses that nothing has changed - so as
not to wake the sleeping giant. Indeed, lending credence to their
mistaken beliefs, wars will still be fought and brave members of the
masses will continue to die in great Malthusian battles over these very
national borders that, in a very real sense, exist only in their minds.

Such wars, fought over national boundaries, not only help us to maintain
our façade while reducing populations but like so many other tricks
we've employed, they allow us to fund our global war machine as well.
Another example of this is the war on "drugs" which has also been
moderately successful at helping us to achieve this particular goal. As
should be obvious, a two-state world, controlled by the less populous of
the two states, is in need of a great deal of military might.

In closing, I continue to be amazed that the masses of the
industrialized nations of the world could be fooled to the very extent
that they have been. To their credit, we have made things
rather confusing for them. Imagine the look on American's faces were
they to realize that we, the elite, built up both Nazi Germany and the
Soviets prior to World War II! Priceless, absolutely priceless!

Thank you all!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments or suggestions? Send them to: The Postman

This page was last updated on 08/20/2000

Copyright © 2000 Island Earth